-
Volume 34,
Issue 2,
1984
Volume 34, Issue 2, 1984
- Original Papers Relating To Systematic Bacteriology
-
-
-
Motility and Flagellation of Cellulomonads
More LessThe flagellation and motility of seven cellulomonads (Cellulomonas biazotea ATCC 486T, [T = type strain], Cellulomonas fimi ATCC 484T, Cellulomonas flavigena ATCC 482T, Cellulomonas gelida ATCC 488T, “Cellulomonas subalbus” ATCC 489, Cellulomonas cellasea ATCC 487T, and Cellulomonas uda ATCC 491T) were examined by light microscopy and electron microscopy. Cells of all seven strains possessed polar multitrichous flagella, and a few cells possessed polar monotrichous flagella.
-
-
-
-
Enterococcus avium nom. rev., comb. nov.; E. casseliflavus nom. rev., comb. nov.; E. durans nom. rev., comb. nov.; E. gallinarum comb. nov.; and E. malodoratus sp. nov.
More LessBiochemical, chemical, and genetic data indicate that strains labeled Streptococcus avium (Nowlan and Deibel), “Streptococcus casseliflavus” (Vaughn, Riggsby and Mundt), “Streptococcus durans” (Sherman and Wing), “Streptococcus faecalis subsp. malodoratus” (Pette), and Streptococcus gallinarum (Bridge and Sneath) are closely related to members of the genus Enterococcus Schleifer and Kilpper-Bälz. We propose that these taxa be classified as members of the genus Enterococcus, as Enterococcus avium nom. rev., comb. nov., Enterococcus casseliflavus nom. rev., comb. nov., Enterococcus durans nom. rev., comb. nov., Enterococcus malodoratus sp. nov., and Enterococcus gallinarum comb. nov., respectively.
-
-
-
Bacillus amylolyticus sp. nov., nom. rev., Bacillus lautus sp. nov., nom. rev., Bacillus pabuli sp. nov., nom. rev., and Bacillus validus sp. nov., nom. rev.
More LessThe names “Bacillus amylolyticus” Choukévitch 1911, “Bacillus lautus” Batchelor 1919, “Bacillus pabuli” Schieblich 1923, and “Bacillus validus” Bredemann and Heigener 1935 were not included on the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names. The names Bacillus amylolyticus, Bacillus lautus, Bacillus pabuli, and Bacillus validus are here revived; all of these names except Bacillus amylolyticus are used for the same taxa to which they were originally applied. The name Bacillus amylolyticus is applied to the taxon described by Kellerman and McBeth. The type strains of B. amylolyticus, B. lautus, B. pabuli, and B. validus are strains NRRL NRS-290, NRRL NRS-666, NRRL NRS-924, and NRRL NRS-1000, respectively.
-
- Original Papers Relating To The Systematics Of Yeasts
-
-
-
Antigenic Relationships Among Some Candida Species Studied by Crossed-Line Immunoelectrophoresis: Taxonomic Significance
More LessIn crossed immunoelectrophoresis with the corresponding pooled rabbit antisera, Candida tropicalis and Candida albicans antigen preparations produced 65 and 63 immunoprecipitates, respectively. The cross-reactions between these antigens and antigens from 15 other yeast strains representing nine species were studied by crossed-line immunoelectrophoresis, using C. tropicalis and C. albicans antigen-antibody systems as references. We found no qualitative differences between strains of the same species or among the strains of C. albicans, Candida stellatoidea, and Candida claussenii. In both the C. albicans and C. tropicalis reference systems the degrees of cross-reaction between C. albicans or C. tropicalis and the nine other species revealed the following three groups: C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. stellatoidea, and C. claussenii, which shared 85 to 100% of their antigens with C. albicans and C. tropicalis; Candida parapsilosis, Candida guilliermondii, and Candida sake, which shared 50 to 70% of their antigens with C. albicans and C. tropicalis; and Candida utilis, Candida pseudotropicalis, Candida krusei, and Candida zeylanoides, which shared about 30% of their antigens with C. albicans and C. tropicalis. Some antigens seemed to be species specific, whereas others seemed to be specific for a group of species within the genus Candida and should be useful for rapid identification of medically important yeasts.
-
-
- Matters Relating To The International Committee On Systematic Bacteriology: Minutes
-
Volumes and issues
-
Volume 75 (2025)
-
Volume 74 (2024)
-
Volume 73 (2023)
-
Volume 72 (2022 - 2023)
-
Volume 71 (2020 - 2021)
-
Volume 70 (2020)
-
Volume 69 (2019)
-
Volume 68 (2018)
-
Volume 67 (2017)
-
Volume 66 (2016)
-
Volume 65 (2015)
-
Volume 64 (2014)
-
Volume 63 (2013)
-
Volume 62 (2012)
-
Volume 61 (2011)
-
Volume 60 (2010)
-
Volume 59 (2009)
-
Volume 58 (2008)
-
Volume 57 (2007)
-
Volume 56 (2006)
-
Volume 55 (2005)
-
Volume 54 (2004)
-
Volume 53 (2003)
-
Volume 52 (2002)
-
Volume 51 (2001)
-
Volume 50 (2000)
-
Volume 49 (1999)
-
Volume 48 (1998)
-
Volume 47 (1997)
-
Volume 46 (1996)
-
Volume 45 (1995)
-
Volume 44 (1994)
-
Volume 43 (1993)
-
Volume 42 (1992)
-
Volume 41 (1991)
-
Volume 40 (1990)
-
Volume 39 (1989)
-
Volume 38 (1988)
-
Volume 37 (1987)
-
Volume 36 (1986)
-
Volume 35 (1985)
-
Volume 34 (1984)
-
Volume 33 (1983)
-
Volume 32 (1982)
-
Volume 31 (1981)
-
Volume 30 (1980)
-
Volume 29 (1979)
-
Volume 28 (1978)
-
Volume 27 (1977)
-
Volume 26 (1976)
-
Volume 25 (1975)
-
Volume 24 (1974)
-
Volume 23 (1973)
-
Volume 22 (1972)
-
Volume 21 (1971)
-
Volume 20 (1970)
-
Volume 19 (1969)
-
Volume 18 (1968)
-
Volume 17 (1967)
-
Volume 16 (1966)
-
Volume 15 (1965)
-
Volume 14 (1964)
-
Volume 13 (1963)
-
Volume 12 (1962)
-
Volume 11 (1961)
-
Volume 10 (1960)
-
Volume 9 (1959)
-
Volume 8 (1958)
-
Volume 7 (1957)
-
Volume 6 (1956)
-
Volume 5 (1955)
-
Volume 4 (1954)
-
Volume 3 (1953)
-
Volume 2 (1952)
-
Volume 1 (1951)
Most Read This Month
