1887

Abstract

Because a natural entity “species” cannot be recognized as a group of strains that is genetically well separated from its phylogenetic neighbors, a pragmatic approach was taken to define a species by a polyphasic approach (L. G. Wayne, D. J. Brenner, R. R. Colwell, P. A. D. Grimont, O. Kandler, M. I. Krichevsky, L. H. Moore, W. E. C. Moore, R. G. E. Murray, E. Stackebrandt, M. P. Starr, and H. G. Trüper, Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 37:463-464, 1987), in which a DNA reassociation value of about 70% plays a dominant role. With the establishment of rapid sequence analysis of 16S rRNA and the recognition of its potential to determine the phylogenetic position of any prokaryotic organism, the role of 16S rRNA similarities in the present species definition in bacteriology needs to be clarified. Comparative studies clearly reveal the limitations of the sequence analysis of this conserved gene and gene product in the determination of relationships at the strain level for which DNA-DNA reassociation experiments still constitute the superior method. Since today the primary structure of 16S rRNA is easier to determine than hybridization between DNA strands, the strength of the sequence analysis is to recognize the level at which DNA pairing studies need to be performed, which certainly applies to similarities of 97% and higher.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-44-4-846
1994-10-01
2022-12-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/44/4/ijs-44-4-846.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-44-4-846&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Amann R. I., Lin C., Key R., Montgomery L., Stahl D. A. 1992; Diversity among Fibrobacter strains: towards a phylogenetic classification. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 15:23–31
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ash C, Farrow J. A. E., Dorsch M., Stackebrandt E., Collins M. D. 1991; Comparative analysis of Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, and related species on the basis of reverse transcriptase sequencing of 16S rRNA. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 41:343–346
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baess I. 1982; Deoxyribonucleic acid relatedness among species of rapidly growing mycobacteria. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Immunol. Scand. Sect. B 90:371–375
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baess I. 1983; Deoxyribonucleic acid relationships between different serovars of Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellular and Mycobacterium scrofulaceum. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Immunol. Scand. Sect. B 91:201–203
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Balch W. E., Fox G. E., Magrum L. J., Woese C. R., Wolfe R. S. 1979; Methanogens: reevaluation of a unique biological group. Microbiol. Rev. 43:260–296
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bautz E. K. F., Bautz F. A. 1964; The influence of non-complementary bases on the stability of ordered polynucleotides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 52:1476–1481
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brenner D. J., Steigerwalt A. G., Ibrahim A., Stackebrandt E. Unpublished data
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cohn F. 1872; Untersuchungen über Bacterien. Beitr. Biol. Pfl. Heft 2:1127–224
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohn F. 1876; Untersuchungen über Bacterien IV. Beitr. Biol. Pfl. Heft 2:249–277
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cowan S. T. 1968 A dictionary of microbial taxonomic usage Oliver and Boyd; Edinburgh:
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fox G. E., Wisotzkey J. D., Jurtshuk P. Jr. 1992; How close is close: 16S rRNA sequence identity may not be sufficient to guarantee species identity. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 42:166–170
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Johnson J. L. 1985; DNA reassociation and RNA hybridization of bacterial nucleic acids. Methods Microbiol. 28:33–74
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ludwig W., Mittenhuber G., Friedrich C. G. 1993; Transfer of Thiosphaera pantotropha to Paracoccus denitrificans. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 43:363–367
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Moran N., Baumann P. 1994; Phylogenetics of cytoplasmically inherited microorganisms of arthropods. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9:15–20
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Moran N. A., Munson M. A., Baumann P., Ishikawa H. 1993; A molecular clock in endosymbiotic bacteria is calibrated using the insect hosts. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 253:167–171
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ochman H., Wilson A. C. 1987; Evolution in bacteria: evidence for a universal substitution rate in cellular genomes. J. Mol. Evol. 26:74–86
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ravin A. W. 1963; Experimental approaches to the study of bacterial phylogeny. Am. Nat. 97:307–325
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Schleifer K. H., Stackebrandt E. 1983; Molecular systematics of prokaryotes. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 37:143–187
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Spaeth G. 1989 Überprüfung der taxonomischen Stellung von Bacillus anthracis mit Hilfe der DNA Hybridisierungs Technik Ph.D. thesis University Giessen; Giessen, Germany:
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Stackebrandt E., Liesack W., Witt D. 1992; Ribosomal RNA and rRNA sequence analyses. Gene 115:255–260
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Steigerwalt A. G., Fanning G. R., Fife-Ashbury M. A., Brenner D. J. 1976; DNA relatedness among species of Enterobacter and Serratia. Can. J. Microbiol. 22:121–137
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ullmann J. S., McCarthy B. J. 1973; The relationship between mismatched base pairs and the thermal stability of DNA duplexes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 294:416–424
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Wayne L. G., Brenner D. J., Colwell R. R., Grimont P. A. D., Kandier O., Krichevsky M. I., Moore L. H., Moore W. E. C., Murray R. G. E., Stackebrandt E., Starr M. P., Trüper H. G. 1987; Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Reconciliation of Approaches to Bacterial Systematics. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 37:463–464
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Woese C. R. 1987; Bacterial evolution. Microbiol. Rev. 51:221–271
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-44-4-846
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-44-4-846
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error