- Volume 22, Issue 1, 1972
Volume 22, Issue 1, 1972
- Original Papers Relating To Systematic Bacteriology
-
-
-
Listeria Pirie—Whom Does It Honor?
More LessThe evidence indicates that Listerella Pirie 1927 and Listeria Pirie 1940 were named in honor of Lord Joseph Lister, the father of antiseptic surgery, and not Sir Spencer Lister, as some have claimed. Other uses of Listerella as a generic name recognized the contributions of Lord Lister’s father and younger brother. The Listers honored by other uses of the names Listeria and Listera were not of Lord Lister’s immediate family. The specific epithet listeri used in the names of three species of bacteria, also honors Lord Lister.
-
-
-
-
Enterobacter agglomerans (Beijerinck) comb. nov. (the Herbicola-Lathyri Bacteria)
More LessThe biochemical reactions given by 361 strains of herbicolala-thyri bacteria were studied and reported. The microorganisms were categorized into 11 principal biogroups on the basis of reduction of nitrate and their Voges-Proskauer and indole reactions. The taxonomic positions and the nomenclature of the bacteria were discussed in detail, and the microorganisms were classified in the genus Enterobacter as Enterobacter agglomerans (Beijerinck) comb. nov. NCTC 9381 (ATCC 27155; CDC 1461–67) was designated as the neotype strain of the species.
-
-
-
Biochemical Characterization of Citrobacter diversus (Burkey) Werkman and Gillen and Designation of the Neotype Strain
More LessThe biochemical characteristics of 137 strains of Citrobacter diversus (Burkey) Werkman and Gillen were determined, and the resulting data are summarized. Members of this species produced indole and ornithine decarboxylase and fermented adonitol but failed to grow in KCN medium. Detectable amounts of hydrogen sulfide were not produced in triple sugar-iron-agar medium but were formed by some strains in peptone-iron-agar. The nomenclature and taxonomic position of these bacteria are discussed, and information that should be helpful for their differentiation from Citrobacter freundii and Enterobacter cloacae is included. Strain 3613–63 (ATCC 27156) is designated as the neotype strain and is described herein.
-
-
-
Report on a Study Set of Moraxellae and Allied Bacteria
More LessSixty-two strains of moraxellae and allied bacteria assembled by the Subcommittee on Moraxella and Allied Bacteria of the International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology and distributed by the American Type Culture Collection were examined serologically by the fluorescent-antibody (FA) and quellung techniques and subjected to study using 71 biochemical tests. These strains, originally assigned to 11 different genera, were placed in two categories: Acinetobacter and Moraxella. There were 41 strains assigned to Acinetobacter and 19 to Moraxella. Two strains were eliminated from the study. One strain belonged to neither of these genera; the other was eliminated on the basis of colonial and biochemical variability. Sixty per cent of the carbohydrate-oxidizing strains of Acinetobacter were typable by FA and quellung reaction in conjugates and sera prepared from oxidizing strains. The capsular antigens of the oxidizers (formerly called Herellea) are distinctly different from those of the nonoxidizers (formerly called Mima). A small percentage of the nonoxidizing cultures exhibited cross-reactions with antibodies for the oxidizers. None of the moraxellae were typable with conjugates or antisera for the oxidizing acinetobacters. The results of these studies were correlated with those of other workers. In general, the classification of the bacteria discussed in this report was quite reliable when based on the use of seven selected phenotypic characteristics. This fact has practical diagnostic importance. The true relationships and taxonomic placements of the moraxellae and allied bacteria are dependent upon the development and employment of systems for genetic analysis. On the basis of studies reviewed in this paper, most workers would now agree upon the separation of the oxidase-positive and oxidase-negative organisms with assignment of the former to the genus Moraxella Lwoff and of the latter to the genus Acinetobacter Brisou and Prévot.
-
-
-
Characterization of an Actinobacillus Isolated from the Sow Vagina
More LessThe growth characteristics, morphology, and biochemical activity of four strains of a hemolytic, urease-positive, gram-negative organism isolated from vaginal exudate of postparturient sows closely resembled those of organisms belonging to the genus Actinobacillus. Comparison by agglutination, immunodiffusion, and electrophoresis in acrylamide gel revealed that the four strains were identical. They were distinguished from A. lignieresii, A. equuli, A. seminis, A. suis, and other members of the family Brucellaceae by means of these three techniques. The four strains were related antigenically to all strains of the genus Actinobacillus examined, but were related most closely to A. seminis and A. suis. The antigenic relatedness and other similarities support inclusion of the organism in the genus Actinobacillus. Its biochemical, antigenic, and electrophoretic differences from established species of the genus Actinobacillus support the conclusion that this swine actinobacillus is a new species. A species name is not proposed for this organism because of the present uncertain taxonomic status of related actinobacilli. The swine actinobacillus persisted in the vagina of two sows for at least 40 days after intravaginal inoculation; however, proof that vaginal infection with the organism causes urogenital disorders of any type has not been obtained. Intraperitoneal and intravenous inoculation of four 6-week-old colostrum-deprived pigs with the organism resulted in no clinical or postmortem evidence of disease. Strain 192 (= ATCC 27072 = NCTC 10801) is the representative strain of this group of swine actinobacilli.
-
-
-
Synonymy of Mycoplasma arginini and Mycoplasma leonis
More LessMycoplasma arginini Barile et al. 1968 and Mycoplasma leonis Heyward et al. 1969 are regarded as synonyms on the basis of comparisons of the original species descriptions and of the serological and biochemical characteristics of authentic strains, including the type strains, of each of the organisms. According to the rules of nomenclature, the correct name of the species formed by the union of these two taxa is M. arginini Barile et al., which name has priority over M. leonis Heyward et al.
-
- Matters Relating To The International Committee On Nomenclature Of Bacteria
-
-
-
Conservation of the Specific Epithet fortuitum in the Name of the Organism Known as Mycobacterium fortuitum da Costa Cruz
More LessStanford and Gunthorpe have documented well the illegitimacy of Mycobacterium fortuitum da Costa Cruz 1938 as a later synonym of Mycobacterium ranae Bergey et al. 1923. Nevertheless, in the interest of stability of nomenclature, conservation of the specific epithet fortuitum over ranae is desired.
-
-
Volumes and issues
-
Volume 75 (2025)
-
Volume 74 (2024)
-
Volume 73 (2023)
-
Volume 72 (2022 - 2023)
-
Volume 71 (2020 - 2021)
-
Volume 70 (2020)
-
Volume 69 (2019)
-
Volume 68 (2018)
-
Volume 67 (2017)
-
Volume 66 (2016)
-
Volume 65 (2015)
-
Volume 64 (2014)
-
Volume 63 (2013)
-
Volume 62 (2012)
-
Volume 61 (2011)
-
Volume 60 (2010)
-
Volume 59 (2009)
-
Volume 58 (2008)
-
Volume 57 (2007)
-
Volume 56 (2006)
-
Volume 55 (2005)
-
Volume 54 (2004)
-
Volume 53 (2003)
-
Volume 52 (2002)
-
Volume 51 (2001)
-
Volume 50 (2000)
-
Volume 49 (1999)
-
Volume 48 (1998)
-
Volume 47 (1997)
-
Volume 46 (1996)
-
Volume 45 (1995)
-
Volume 44 (1994)
-
Volume 43 (1993)
-
Volume 42 (1992)
-
Volume 41 (1991)
-
Volume 40 (1990)
-
Volume 39 (1989)
-
Volume 38 (1988)
-
Volume 37 (1987)
-
Volume 36 (1986)
-
Volume 35 (1985)
-
Volume 34 (1984)
-
Volume 33 (1983)
-
Volume 32 (1982)
-
Volume 31 (1981)
-
Volume 30 (1980)
-
Volume 29 (1979)
-
Volume 28 (1978)
-
Volume 27 (1977)
-
Volume 26 (1976)
-
Volume 25 (1975)
-
Volume 24 (1974)
-
Volume 23 (1973)
-
Volume 22 (1972)
-
Volume 21 (1971)
-
Volume 20 (1970)
-
Volume 19 (1969)
-
Volume 18 (1968)
-
Volume 17 (1967)
-
Volume 16 (1966)
-
Volume 15 (1965)
-
Volume 14 (1964)
-
Volume 13 (1963)
-
Volume 12 (1962)
-
Volume 11 (1961)
-
Volume 10 (1960)
-
Volume 9 (1959)
-
Volume 8 (1958)
-
Volume 7 (1957)
-
Volume 6 (1956)
-
Volume 5 (1955)
-
Volume 4 (1954)
-
Volume 3 (1953)
-
Volume 2 (1952)
-
Volume 1 (1951)