1887

Abstract

The growth characteristics, morphology, and biochemical activity of four strains of a hemolytic, urease-positive, gram-negative organism isolated from vaginal exudate of postparturient sows closely resembled those of organisms belonging to the genus . Comparison by agglutination, immunodiffusion, and electrophoresis in acrylamide gel revealed that the four strains were identical. They were distinguished from , and other members of the family by means of these three techniques. The four strains were related antigenically to all strains of the genus examined, but were related most closely to and . The antigenic relatedness and other similarities support inclusion of the organism in the genus . Its biochemical, antigenic, and electrophoretic differences from established species of the genus support the conclusion that this swine actinobacillus is a new species. A species name is not proposed for this organism because of the present uncertain taxonomic status of related actinobacilli. The swine actinobacillus persisted in the vagina of two sows for at least 40 days after intravaginal inoculation; however, proof that vaginal infection with the organism causes urogenital disorders of any type has not been obtained. Intraperitoneal and intravenous inoculation of four 6-week-old colostrum-deprived pigs with the organism resulted in no clinical or postmortem evidence of disease. Strain 192 (= ATCC 27072 = NCTC 10801) is the representative strain of this group of swine actinobacilli.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-22-1-39
1972-01-01
2022-05-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/22/1/ijs-22-1-39.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-22-1-39&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ashford W. A., Shirlaw J. F. 1962; A case of verrucose endocarditis in a piglet caused by an organism of the Actinobacillus genus. Vet. Rec. 74:1417–1418
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dickinson A. B., Mocquot G. 1961; Studies on the bacterial flora of the alimentary tract of pigs. I. Enterobacteriaceae and other gramnegative bacteria. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 24:252–284
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Edwards P. R., Taylor E. L. 1941; Shigella equirulis infection in a sow. Cornell Vet. 31:392–393
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Jones J. E. T., Simmons J. R. 1971; Endocarditis in the pig caused by Actinobacillus equuli: A field and an experimental case. Brit. Vet. J. 127:25–29
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Magnusson H. 1931; Bacterium viscosum equi (Adsersen) in suckling pigs and its relation to Bacillus polymorphus suis (Degen) in focal interstitial nephritis in swine. 11th Int. Vet. Congr.London Reports for Section Meetings 3488–510
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Merchant I. A., Packer R. A. 1967 Veterinary bacteriology and virology. , 7th. Iowa State University Press; Ames, Iowa:
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Mraz O. 1968; Réévaluation of original strains Actinobacillus suis and haemolytic strains of Actinobacillus lignieresii ATCC isolated from organs of diseased pigs. Acta Univ. Agr. Fac. Vet. 37:277–290
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Razin S., Rottem S. 1967; Identification of Mycoplasma and other microorganisms by polyacrylamide-gel electrophoresis of cell proteins. J. Bacteriol. 94:1807–1810
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ross R. F., Christian L. L., Spear M. L. 1969; Role of certain bacteria in mastitis-metritisagalactia of sows. J. Amer. Vet. Med. Ass. 155:1844–1852
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Van Dorssen C. A., Jaartsveld F. H. J. 1962; Actinobacillus suis (novo species) een bij het varken voorkomende bacterie. Tijdschr. Diergeneesk. 87:450–458
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Van Hemert P., Van Wezel A. L., Cohen H. H. 1964; Preparation of soluble pertussis vaccine. Nature (London) 203:774–775
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Wetmore P. W., Thiel J. F., Herman Y. E., Harr J. R. 1963; Comparison of selected Actinobacillus species with a hemolytic variety of Actinobacillus from irradiated swine. J. Infec. Dis. 113:186–194
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Zimmermann V. T. 1964; Untersuchungen tiber die actinobazillose des schweines. 1. Mitteilung: Isolierung und Charakterisierung der erreger. Deut. Tieràrztl. Wochenschr. 7:457–461
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-22-1-39
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-22-1-39
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error