Pseudomonas schmalbachii sp. nov., isolated from the gut of a millipede (Trigoniulus corallinus) from a coconut tree

References

1. Peix A, Ramírez-Bahena M-H, Velázquez E. The current status on the taxonomy of Pseudomonas revisited: An update. Infect Genet Evol 2018; 57:106–116 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
2. Moore ERB, Tindall BJ, Martins dos Santos VAP, Pieper DH, Ramos JL et al. Nonmedical: Pseudomonas. Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer KH, Stackebrandt E. eds In The Prokaryotes New York: Springer; 2006 pp 646–703
   [Google Scholar]
3. Migula N. Arbeiten Aus dem Bakteriologischen. Inst Technischen Hochschule Karlsruhe 1894; 1:235–238
   [Google Scholar]
4. Mulet M, Gomila M, Lemaitre B, Lalucat J, García-Valdés E. Taxonomic characterisation of Pseudomonas strain L48 and formal proposal of Pseudomonas entomophila sp. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 2012; 35:145–149 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
5. Nowell RW, Laue BE, Sharp PM, Green S. Comparative genomics reveals genes significantly associated with woody hosts in the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae. Mol Plant Pathol 2016; 17:1409–1424 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
6. Menéndez E, Ramírez-Bahena MH, Fabryová A, Igual JM, Benada O et al. Pseudomonas coleopterorum sp. nov., a cellulase-producing bacterium isolated from the bark beetle Hylesinus fraxini. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:2852–2858 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
7. Anwar N, Abaydulla G, Zayadan B, Abdurahman M, Hamood B et al. Pseudomonas populi sp. nov., an endophytic bacterium isolated from Populus euphratica. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1419–1425 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
8. Hu X, Yu J, Wang C, Chen H. Cellulolytic bacteria associated with the gut of Dendroctonus armandi larvae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). Forests 2014; 5:455–465 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bansal R, Hulbert SH, Reese JC, Whitworth RJ, Stuart JJ et al. Pyrosequencing reveals the predominance of Pseudomonadaceae in gut microbiome of a gall midge. Pathogens 2014; 3:459–472 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
10. Zhang F, Huang YH, Liu SZ, Zhang L, Li BT et al. Pseudomonas reactans, a bacterial strain isolated from the intestinal flora of Blattella germanica with anti-Beauveria bassiana activity. Environ Entomol 2013; 42:453–459 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
11. Shelomi M, Chen M-J. Culturing-enriched metabarcoding analysis of the Oryctes rhinoceros gut microbiome. Insects 2020; 11:e782 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
12. Kasana RC, Salwan R, Dhar H, Dutt S, Gulati A. A rapid and easy method for the detection of microbial cellulases on agar plates using Gram’s iodine. Curr Microbiol 2008; 57:503–507 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
13. Ki J-S, Zhang W, Qian P-Y. Discovery of Marine bacillus species by 16S rRNA and rpob comparisons and their usefulness for species identification. J Microbiol Methods 2009; 77:48–57 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
14. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. J Mol Biol 1990; 215:403–410 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
15. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing Ezbiocloud: A taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
16. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2114–2120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
17. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. Spades: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
18. Prjibelski A, Antipov D, Meleshko D, Lapidus A, Korobeynikov A. Using spades de novo assembler. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 2020; 70:e102 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
19. Li H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv preprint 201313033997
    [Google Scholar]
20. Klockgether J, Cramer N, Wiehlmann L, Davenport CF, Tümmler B. Pseudomonas aeruginosa genomic structure and diversity. Front Microbiol 2011; 2:150 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
21. Seemann T. PROKKA: Rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2068–2069 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
22. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
23. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
24. Na S-I, Kim YO, Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Baek I et al. UBCG: Up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Microbiol 2018; 56:280–285 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
25. Alcock BP, Raphenya AR, Lau TTY, Tsang KK, Bouchard M et al. CARD 2020: Antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic Resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res 2020; 48:D517–D525 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
26. Liu B, Zheng D, Jin Q, Chen L, Yang J. VFDB 2019: A comparative pathogenomic platform with an interactive web interface. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:D687–D692 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
27. Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD. MAFFT online service: Multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief Bioinform 2019; 20:1160–1166 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
28. Katoh K, Kuma K, Toh H, Miyata T. MAFFT version 5: Improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33:511–518 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
29. Trifinopoulos J, Nguyen L-T, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. W-IQ-TREE: A fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:W232–5 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
30. Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:268–274 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
31. Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS. Ufboot2: Improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:518–522 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
32. Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. Modelfinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods 2017; 14:587–589 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
33. Sazci A, Erenler K, Radford A. Detection of cellulolytic fungi by using Congo red as an indicator: A comparative study with the dinitrosalicyclic acid reagent method. J Appl Bacteriol 1986; 61:559–562 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
34. Akita H, Kimura Z-I, Hoshino T. Pseudomonas humi sp. nov., isolated from leaf soil. Arch Microbiol 2019; 201:245–251 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
35. Wang Y-N, He W-H, He H, Du X, Jia B et al. Pseudomonas nitritireducens sp. nov., a nitrite reduction bacterium isolated from wheat soil. Arch Microbiol 2012; 194:809–813 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
36. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI technical note 101. Newark, DE: 1990
    [Google Scholar]
37. Schmalbach P. Affective Response to Exercise, Affective Style, Perceived Competence, and Physical Activity Behavior in Adolescents University of California, Irvine; Irvine, CA: 2014
    [Google Scholar]
38. Lahham S, Schmalbach P, Wilson SP, Ludeman L, Subeh M et al. Prospective evaluation of point-of-care ultrasound for pre-procedure identification of landmarks versus traditional palpation for lumbar puncture. World J Emerg Med 2016; 7:173–177 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]