1887

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY logo

Volume 71, Issue 10

sp. nov. and sp. nov., two novel species isolated from forest soil No Access

Abstract

Three aerobic, Gram-stain-negative, non-motile and rod-shaped bacteria, designated strains RXD178, RXD172-2 and RLT1W51, were isolated from two forest soil samples of Nanling National Nature Reserve in Guangdong Province, PR China. Phylogenetic analyses based on 16S rRNA gene sequences and 92 core genes showed that they belonged to the genus , and were most closely related to four validly published species with similarities ranging from 99.4 to 98.2 %. The genomic DNA G+C contents of strains RXD178, RXD172-2 and RLT1W51 were 57.1, 59.5 and 59.4 mol%, respectively. The genome-derived average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) values between the novel strains and closely related type species were below 37.90 and 89.34 %, respectively. Meanwhile, the ANI and dDDH values between strains RXD172-2 and RLT1W51 were 98.27 and 83.50 %, respectively. The three novel strains contained C, C cyclo and summed feature 3 (C 6 and/or C 7) as the major fatty acids, and summed feature 8 (C 6 and/or C 7) comprised a relative higher proportion in strain RXD178 than in other strains. Both strains RXD172-2 and RLT1W51 had phosphatidylglycerol (PG), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), diphosphatidylglycerol (DPG) and an unidentified aminophospholipid (APL) as the main polar lipids while only PE and APL were detected in strain RXD178. Ubiquinone 8 was the predominant quinone. Based on the phenotypic, chemotaxonomic, phylogenetic and genomic analyses, strain RXD178 should be considered as representing one novel species within the genus and strains RXD172-2 and RLT1W51 as another one, for which the names sp. nov. and sp. nov. are proposed, with RXD178 (=GDMCC 1.1925=KACC 21987) and RLT1W51 (=GDMCC 1.1923=KACC 21985) as the type strains, respectively.

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Revised:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): Collimonas humicola , Collimonas silvisoli , forest soil and Nanling National Nature Reserve
Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • the GDAS’ Project of Science and Technology Development (Award 2020GDASYL-20200301003)
    • Principle Award Recipient: YangZhou
  • the Science and Technology Program of Guangdong Province (Award 2018B030324001)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Guang-DaFeng
  • the Key Realm R&D Program of Guangdong Province (Award 2018B020205001)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Guang-DaFeng
© 2021 The Authors
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005061
2021-10-22
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. de Boer W, Leveau JH, Kowalchuk GA, Klein Gunnewiek PJ, Abeln EC et al. Collimonas fungivorans gen. nov., sp. nov., a chitinolytic soil bacterium with the ability to grow on living fungal hyphae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:857–864 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Family II. Oxalobacteraceae fam. nov. Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, Garrity GM. eds In Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd. edn New York: Springer; 2006 pp 1–623
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Höppener-Ogawa S, de Boer W, Leveau JH, van Veen JA, de Brandt E et al. Collimonas arenae sp. nov. and Collimonas pratensis sp. nov., isolated from (semi-)natural grassland soils. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:414–419 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Lee SD. Collimonas antrihumi sp. nov., isolated from a natural cave and emended description of the genus Collimonas. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:2448–2453 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Leveau JH, Uroz S, de Boer W. The bacterial genus Collimonas: mycophagy, weathering and other adaptive solutions to life in oligotrophic soil environments. Environ Microbiol 2010; 12:281–292 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 1991; 173:697–703 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 1971; 20:406–416 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Tamura K. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions when there are strong transition-transversion and G+C-content biases. Mol Biol Evol 1992; 9:678–687 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Lee I, Chalita M, Ha SM, Na SI, Yoon SH et al. ContEst16S: an algorithm that identifies contaminated prokaryotic genomes using 16S RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2053–2057 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Na SI, Kim YO, Yoon SH, Ha SM, Baek I et al. UBCG: Up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree recon- struction. J Microbiol 2018; 56:280–285 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Buck JD. Nonstaining (KOH) method for determination of Gram reactions of marine bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 1982; 44:992–993 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Tindall BJ, Sikorski J, Smibert RA, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization and the principles of comparative systematics. Reddy CA, Beveridge TJ, Breznak JA, Marzluf GA, Schmidt TM. eds In Methods for general and molecular microbiology, 3rd. edn Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2007 pp 330–393
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Kamilova F, Leveau JH, Lugtenberg B. Collimonas fungivorans, an unpredicted in vitro but efficient in vivo biocontrol agent for the suppression of tomato foot and root rot. Environ Microbiol 2007; 9:1597–1603 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Mela F, Fritsche K, de Boer W, van Veen JA, de Graaff LH et al. Dual transcriptional profiling of a bacterial/fungal confrontation: Collimonas fungivorans versus Aspergillus niger. ISME J 2011; 5:1494–1504 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Fritsche K, van den Berg M, de Boer W, van Beek TA, Raaijmakers JM et al. Biosynthetic genes and activity spectrum of antifungal polyynes from Collimonas fungivorans Ter331. Environ Microbiol 2014; 16:1334–1345 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. De Boer W, Klein Gunnewiek PJA, Lafeber P, Janse JD, Spit BE et al. Anti-fungal properties of chitinolytic dune soil bacteria. Soil Biol Biochem 1998; 30:193–203 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Morrissey RF, Dugan EP, Koths JS. Chitinase production by an Arthrobacter sp. lysing cells of Fusarium roseum. Soil Biol Biochem 1976; 8:23–28 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Saito A, Fujii T, Yoneyama T, Miyashita K. glkA is involved in glucose repression of chitinase production in Streptomyces lividans. J Bacteriol 1998; 180:2911–2914 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI Technical Note 101. Newark, DE: MIDI Inc; 1990
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Collins MD. Isoprenoidquinones. Goodfellow M, O’Donnell AG. eds In Chemical Methods in Prokaryotic Systematics Chichester: Johb Wiley & Sons Ltd; 1994 pp 265–309
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005061
Loading
Collimonas silvisoli sp. nov. and Collimonas humicola sp. nov., two novel species isolated from forest soil
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 71, 005061 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.005061
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005061
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005061
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error