1887

Abstract

Two white colony-forming, Gram-stain-negative, non-sporulating and motile bacteria, designated G-4-1-8 and RP-4-7, were isolated from forest soil and Arctic soil, respectively. Both strains showed antimicrobial activity against Gram-negative pathogens ( and ) and could grow at a pH range of pH 4.0–11.0 (optimum, pH 7.0–9.0). Phylogenetic analyses based on their 16S rRNA gene sequences indicated that strains G-4-1-8 and RP-4-7 formed a lineage within the family and were clustered as members of the genus . Strain G-4-1-8 showed the highest 16S rRNA sequence similarity to JC2948 (98.1 %), while strain RP-4-7 showed the highest similarity to DNBP6-1 (98.8 %). The only respiratory quinone in both strains was ubiquinone Q-8. Their principal cellular fatty acids were C, cyclo-C, summed feature 3 (iso-C 2-OH and/or C 7) and summed feature 8 (C 7 and/or C 6). Their major polar lipids were phosphatidylethanolamine, diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol and an unidentified aminophospholipid. The DNA G+C content of strains G-4-1-8 and RP-4-7 were 63.7 and 61.3 mol%, respectively, while their genome lengths were 7.44 and 9.67 Mb, respectively. The genomes of both strains showed at least 12 putative biosynthetic gene clusters. The average nucleotide identity and DNA–DNA hybridization relatedness values between both strains and most closely related species were below the species threshold values. Based on a polyphasic study, these isolated strains represent novel species belonging to the genus , for which the names sp. nov. (G-4-1-8= KACC 21617=NBRC 114603) and sp. nov. (RP-4-7=KACC 21621=NBRC 114605) are proposed.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • national research foundation (kr) (Award 2019R1F1A1058501)
    • Principle Award Recipient: JaisooKim
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005060
2021-10-25
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Prestinaci F, Pezzotti P, Pantosti A. Antimicrobial resistance: A global multifaceted phenomenon. Pathog Glob Health 2015; 109:309–318 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dahal RH, Chaudhary DK. Microbial infections and antimicrobial resistance in Nepal: current trends and recommendations. Open Microbiol J 2018; 12:230–242 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Sawana A, Adeolu M, Gupta RS. Molecular signatures and phylogenomic analysis of the genus Burkholderia: Proposal for division of this genus into the emended genus Burkholderia containing pathogenic organisms and a new genus Paraburkholderia gen. nov. harboring environmental species. Front Genet 2014; 5:429 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Parte AC, Carbasse JS, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5607–5612 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Trinh NH, Kim J. Paraburkholderia flava sp. nov., isolated from cool temperate forest soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:2509–2514 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Wilhelm RC, Cyle KT, Martinez CE, Karasz DC, Newman JD et al. Paraburkholderia solitsugae sp. nov. and Paraburkholderia elongata sp. nov., phenolic acid-degrading bacteria isolated from forest soil and emended description of Paraburkholderia madseniana. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5093–5105 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lee Y, Jeon CO. Paraburkholderia aromaticivorans sp. nov., an aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacterium, isolated from gasoline-contaminated soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:1251–1257 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Weber CF, King GM. Volcanic soils as sources of novel CO-oxidizing Paraburkholderia and Burkholderia: Paraburkholderia hiiakae sp. nov., Paraburkholderia metrosideri sp. nov., Paraburkholderia paradisi sp. nov., Paraburkholderia peleae sp. nov., and Burkholderia alpina sp. nov. a member of the Burkholdeia cepacia complex. Front Microbiol 2017; 8:207 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dahal RH, Chaudhary DK, Kim J. Pinisolibacter ravus gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from pine forest soil and allocation of the genera Ancalomicrobium and Pinisolibacter to the family Ancalomicrobiaceae fam. nov., and emendation of the genus Ancalomicrobium Staley 1968. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:1955–1962 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dahal RH, Chaudhary DK, Kim D-U, Pandey RP, Kim J. Chryseobacterium antibioticum sp. nov. with antimicrobial activity against Gram-negative bacteria, isolated from Arctic soil. J Antibiot 2021; 74:115–123 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Frank JA, Reich CI, Sharma S, Weisbaum JS, Wilson BA et al. Critical evaluation of two primers commonly used for amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008; 74:2461–2470 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y. Introducing EzBioCloud: A taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhang Z, Schwartz S, Wagner L, Miller W. A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. J Comput Biol 2000; 7:203–214 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee I, Chalita M, Ha S-M, Na S-M, Yoon S-H et al. ContEst16S: an algorithm that identifies contaminated prokaryotic genomes using 16S RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2053–2057 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP et al. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipelineprokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:6614–6624 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T et al. The RAST Server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genomics 2008; 9:75 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Na SI, Kim YO, Yoon SH, Ha S min, Baek I et al. UBCG: Up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Microbiol 2018; 56:281–285
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Schattner P, Brooks AN, Lowe TM. The tRNAscan-SE, snoscan and snoGPS web servers for the detection of tRNAs and snoRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33:W686–9 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Stærfeldt H-H, Rognes T et al. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:3100–3108 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Blin K, Shaw S, Kloosterman AM, Charlop-Powers Z, van Wezel GP et al. antiSMASH 6.0: improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:W29–W35 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Doetsch RN. Determinative methods of light microscopy. Gerdhardt P, Murray RGE, Costilow RN, Nester EW, Wood WA. eds In Manual of Methods for General Bacteriology Washington, DC, USA: American Society for Microbiology; 1981 pp 21–33
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Smibert RM, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization. Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR. eds In Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC; USA: American Society for Microbiology; 1994 pp 607–654
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Dahal RH, Kim J. Fluviicola kyonggii sp. nov., a bacterium isolated from forest soil and emended description of the genus Fluviicola. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:1885–1889 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sasser M. Bacterial identification by gas chromatographic analysis of fatty acid methyl esters (GC-FAME). In MIDI Tech Note 101 Newark: MIDI Inc; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Komagata K, Suzuki K. 4 lipid and cell-wall analysis in bacterial systematics. Methods Microbiol 1988; 19:161–207 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005060
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005060
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error