1887

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY logo

Volume 70, Issue 3

gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from soil in Fildes Peninsula, Antarctica Free

Abstract

A novel strain, designated AQ6-296, was isolated from a soil sample collected in Fildes Peninsula, Antarctic. Cells were Gram-stain-negative, non-endospore-forming, non-motile, strictly aerobic and rod-shaped. Growth occurred at 4–28 °C (optimum, 20 °C) and at pH 6.0–7.0 (optimum, pH 7.0). NaCl was not obligatory for growth. Colonies were pale yellow after growth for 3 days at 20 °C on Reasoner's 2A agar. The strain was weakly positive for oxidase and the catalase test was negative. The only respiratory quinone was Q-8. The predominant cellular fatty acids were iso-C, iso-C, iso-C 3OH, summed feature 3 (comprising Cω7 and/or Cω6) and summed feature 9 (comprising iso-Cω9 and/or C10-methyl). The major polar lipids were phosphatidylethanolamine, unknown aminolipids, phosphatidylglycerol and diphosphatidylglycerol. The results of phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences (the highest similarity at 92.4 % to ) indicated that strain AQ6-296 is within the family . The DNA G+C content of the type strain was 58.6 mol%. On the basis of phenotypic, chemotaxonomic and phylogenetic data, strain AQ6-296 is considered to represent a novel genus and species in the family , for which the name gen. nov., sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is AQ6-296 (CCTCC AB 2016313=KCTC 52744).

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Revised:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): Antarctica , Pseudolysobacter antarcticus and soil
Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Chinese Polar Scientific Strategy Research Fund (Award IC201706)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Fang Peng
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award 31270538)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Fang Peng
  • R&D Infrastructure and Facility Development Program (Award NIMR-2019-8)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Fang Peng
  • National Key R&D Program of China (Award 2018YFC1406701)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Fang Peng
© 2020 The Authors
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003984
2020-02-04
2024-12-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/70/3/1861.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003984&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Saddler GS, Bradbury JF. Family I. Xanthomonadaceae fam. nov. In Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, Garrity GM. (editors) Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology 63, 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2005
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Weon H-Y, Yoo S-H, Kim Y-J, Lee C-M, Kim B-Y et al. Rudaea cellulosilytica gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:2308–2312 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Busse HJ, Kämpfer P, Moore ERB, Nuutinen J, Tsitko IV et al. Thermomonas haemolytica gen. nov., sp. nov., a gamma-proteobacterium from kaolin slurry. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:473–483 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 1989
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Rainey FA, Ward-Rainey N, Kroppenstedt RM, Stackebrandt E. The genus Nocardiopsis represents a phylogenetically coherent taxon and a distinct actinomycete lineage: proposal of Nocardiopsaceae fam. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1996; 46:1088–1092 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically United database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S et al. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:2725–2729 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The Clustal_x windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:4876–4882 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 1971; 20:406–416 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Bowman JP. Description of Cellulophaga algicola sp. nov., isolated from the surfaces of Antarctic algae, and reclassification of Cytophaga uliginosa (ZoBell and Upham 1944) Reichenbach 1989 as Cellulophaga uliginosa comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50 Pt 5:1861–1868
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Doetsch RN. Determinative methods of light microscopy. In Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Costilow RN, Nester EW, Wood WA. (editors) Manual of Methods for General Bacteriology Washington, DC, USA: American Society for Microbiology; 1981 pp 21–33
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Schaeffer AB, Fulton MD. A simplified method of staining endospores. Science 1933; 77:194 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol 1966; 45:493–496 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Kovacs N. Identification of Pseudomonas pyocyanea by the oxidase reaction. Nature 1956; 178:703 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Smibert RM, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization. In Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC: American society for Microbiology; 1994 pp 607–654
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Xie C-H, Yokota A. Phylogenetic analyses of Lampropedia hyalina based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence. J Gen Appl Microbiol 2003; 49:345–349 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids Newark, DE: MIDI Inc; 1990 p 101
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Tindall BJ. Lipid composition of Halobacterium lacusprofundi . FEMS Microbiol Lett 1990; 66:199–202 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Moore DD, Dowhan D. Preparation and analysis of DNA. In Ausubel FW, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG. (editors) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology New York: Wiley; 1995 pp 2–11
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Mesbah M, Premachandran U, Whitman WB. Precise measurement of the G+C content of deoxyribonucleic acid by high-performance liquid chromatography. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1989; 39:159–167 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Roberts RJ, Carneiro MO, Schatz MC. The advantages of SMRT sequencing. Genome Biol 2013; 14:405 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Chin C-S, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J et al. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Methods 2013; 10:563–569 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Miller JR, Delcher AL, Koren S, Venter E, Walenz BP et al. Aggressive assembly of pyrosequencing reads with mates. Bioinformatic 2008; 24:2818–2824 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Blin K, Shaw S, Steinke K, Villebro R, Ziemert N et al. antiSMASH 5.0: updates to the secondary metabolite genome mining pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:W81–W87 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Huang L, Zhang H, Wu P, Entwistle S, Li X et al. dbCAN-seq: a database of carbohydrate-active enzyme (CAZyme) sequence and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 2018; 46:D516–D521 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang L, Zheng S, Wang D, Wang L, Wang G. Thermomonas carbonis sp. nov., isolated from the soil of a coal mine. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:3631–3635 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Park JH, Kim R, Aslam Z, Jeon CO, Chung YR. Lysobacter capsici sp. nov., with antimicrobial activity, isolated from the rhizosphere of pepper, and emended description of the genus Lysobacter . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:387–392 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhang L, Bai J, Wang Y, Wu G-L, Dai J et al. Lysobacter korlensis sp. nov. and Lysobacter bugurensis sp. nov., isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:2259–2265 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Kwon S-W, Kim B-Y, Weon H-Y, Baek Y-K, Go S-J et al. Arenimonas donghaensis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from seashore sand. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:954–958 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Yu T-T, Zhou E-M, Yin Y-R, Yao J-C, Ming H et al. Vulcaniibacterium tengchongense gen. nov., sp. nov. isolated from a geothermally heated soil sample, and reclassification of Lysobacter thermophilus Wei et al. 2012 as Vulcaniibacterium thermophilum comb. nov. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2013; 104:369–376 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Lee EM, Jeon CO, Choi I, Chang K-S, Kim C-J. Silanimonas lenta gen. nov., sp. nov., a slightly thermophilic and alkaliphilic gammaproteobacterium isolated from a hot spring. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:385–389 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Finkmann W, Altendorf K, Stackebrandt E, Lipski A. Characterization of N2O-producing Xanthomonas-like isolates from biofilters as Stenotrophomonas nitritireducens sp. nov., Luteimonas mephitis gen. nov., sp. nov. and Pseudoxanthomonas broegbernensis gen. nov., sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50 Pt 1:273–282 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Lin S-Y, Hameed A, Shahina M, Liu Y-C, Hsu Y-H et al. Description of Luteimonas pelagia sp. nov., isolated from marine sediment, and emended descriptions of Luteimonas aquatica, Luteimonas composti, Luteimonas mephitis, Lysobacter enzymogenes and Lysobacter panaciterrae . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:645–651 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  38. KH O, Kang SJ, Jung YT, TK O, Yoon JH et al. Lysobacter dokdonensis sp. nov., isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 61:1089–1093
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003984
Loading
Pseudolysobacter antarcticus gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from soil in Fildes Peninsula, Antarctica
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70, 1861 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.003984
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003984
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003984
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error