Microbispora catharanthi sp. nov., a novel endophytic actinomycete isolated from the root of Catharanthus roseus

References

1. Nonomura H, Ohara Y. Distribution of actinomycetes in the soil. II. Microbispora, a new genus of the Streptomycetaceae . J Ferment Technol 1957; 35:307–311
   [Google Scholar]
2. Nonomura H, Ohara Y. Distribution of the actinomycetes in soil. IV. The isolation and classification of the genus Microbispora . J Ferment Technol 1960; 38:401–405
   [Google Scholar]
3. Miyadoh S, Amano S, Tohyama H, Shomura T. A taxonomic review of the genus Microbispora and a proposal to transfer two species to the genus Actinomadura and to combine ten species into Microbispora rosea. J Gen Microbiol 1990; 136:1905–1913 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
4. Boondaeng A, Ishida Y, Tamura T, Tokuyama S, Kitpreechavanich V. Microbispora siamensis sp. nov., a thermotolerant actinomycete isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:3136–3139 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
5. Li C, Wang H, Wang X, Zhang Z, Zhang Y et al. Microbispora bryophytorum sp. nov., an actinomycete isolated from moss (Bryophyta). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:1274–1279 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
6. Han C, Liu C, Zhao J, Guo L, Lu C et al. Microbispora camponoti sp. nov., a novel actinomycete isolated from the cuticle of Camponotus japonicus Mayr. Anton Leeuw Int J G 2016; 109:215–223 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
7. Nakajima Y, Kitpreechavanich V, Suzuki K-i, Kudo T. Microbispora corallina sp. nov., a new species of the genus Microbispora isolated from Thai soil. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1999; 49:1761–1767 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
8. Xu XX, Wang HL, Lin HP, Wang C, Qu Z et al. Microbispora hainanensis sp. nov., isolated from rhizosphere soil of Excoecaria agallocha in a mangrove. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:2430–2434 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
9. Thawai C, Kittiwongwattana C, Thanaboripat D, Laosinwattana C, Koohakan P et al. Micromonospora soli sp. nov., isolated from rice rhizosphere soil. Anton Leeuw Int J G 2016; 109:449–456 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
10. Han C, Tian Y, Zhao J, Yu Z, Jiang S et al. Microbispora triticiradicis sp. nov., a novel actinomycete isolated from the root of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:3600–3605 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
11. Han C, Zhao J, Yu B, Shi H, Zhang C et al. Microbispora tritici sp. nov., a novel actinomycete isolated from a root of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Anton Leeuw Int J G 2019; 9:1–9
    [Google Scholar]
12. Klykleung N, Tanasupawat S, Pittayakhajonwut P, Ohkuma M, Kudo T. Amycolatopsis stemonae sp. nov., isolated from a Thai medicinal plant. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:3894–3899 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
13. Shirling EB, Gottlieb D. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1966; 16:313–340 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
14. Arai T. Culture Media for Actinomycetes Tokyo, Japan: The Society for Actinomycetes; 1975
    [Google Scholar]
15. Waksman SA. The Actinomycetes. In: A Summary of Current Knowledge New York: Ronald; 1967
    [Google Scholar]
16. Waksman SA. The Actinomycetes, Vol. 2, Classification, Identification and Descriptions of Genera and Species Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1961
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kelly KL. Inter-Society Color Council – National Bureau of Standards Color Name Charts Illustrated with Centroid Colors Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1964
    [Google Scholar]
18. Staneck JL, Roberts GD. Simplified approach to identification of aerobic actinomycetes by thin-layer chromatography. Appl Microbiol 1974; 28:226–231
    [Google Scholar]
19. Mikami H, Ishida Y. Post-Column fluorometric detection of reducing sugars in high performance liquid chromatography using arginine. Bunseki kagaku 1983; 32:E207–E210 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
20. Minnikin DE, O'Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
21. Collins MD, Pirouz T, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Distribution of menaquinones in actinomycetes and corynebacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1977; 100:221–230 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
22. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI Technical Note 101. Newark, DE: MIDI Inc; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
23. Raeder U, Broda P. Rapid preparation of DNA from filamentous fungi. Lett Appl Microbiol 1985; 1:17–20 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. (editors) Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics Chichester: Wiley; 1991 pp 115–148
    [Google Scholar]
25. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22:4673–4680 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
26. Yoon SH, SM H, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically United database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617
    [Google Scholar]
27. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425
    [Google Scholar]
28. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 1971; 20:406–416 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
29. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
30. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
31. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
32. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
33. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
34. Lefort V, Desper R, Gascuel O. FastME 2.0: a comprehensive, accurate, and fast Distance-Based phylogeny inference program: table 1. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:2798–2800 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
35. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T et al. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 2008; 9:75 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
36. Aziz RK, Devoid S, Disz T, Edwards RA, Henry CS et al. Seed servers: high-performance access to the seed genomes, annotations, and metabolic models. PLoS One 2012; 7:e48053 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
37. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
38. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:929–931 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
39. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
40. Lechevalier MP, De Bievre C, Lechevalier H. Chemotaxonomy of aerobic actinomycetes: phospholipid composition. Biochem Syst Ecol 1977; 5:249–260 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
41. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:929–931 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
42. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
43. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]