1887

Abstract

The bacterial genus Ørskov 1928 is illegitimate because of precedence of the fungal genus Saccardo 1904. Therefore, a new genus name, , is proposed as substitute for the bacterial genus. Thus, the type species Ørskov becomes Ørskov Raj comb. nov.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-33-2-397
1983-04-01
2022-12-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/33/2/ijs-33-2-397.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-33-2-397&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Breed R. S., Murray E. G. D., Smith N. R. 1957; Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology. , 7. The Williams & Wilkins Co.; Baltimore:
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Buchanan R. E., Gibbons N. E. 1974; Beigey’s manual of determinative bacteriology. , 8. The Williams & Wilkins Co; Baltimore:
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Claus D. 1967; Taxonomy of some highly pleomorphic bacteria. Spisy Prirodoved. Fak. Univ. J. E. Purkyne Brno K40:254–257
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Holliday P. 1970; Descriptions of pathogenic fungi and bacteria. 225 set 23 Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Surrey, England The Eastern Press Ltd; London:
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lapage S. P., Sneath P. H. A., Lessel E. F., Skerman V. B. D., Seeliger H. P. R., Clark W. A. 1975; International code of nomenclature of bacteria. 1976 Revision. American Society for Microbiology; Washington, D.C.:
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Larkin J. M., Williams P. M, Taylor R. 1977; Taxonomy of the genus Microcyclus Ørskov 1928: reintroduction and emendation of the genus Spirosoma Migula 1894 and proposal of a new genus, Flectobacillus. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 27:147–156
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ørskov J. 1928; Beschreibung eines neuen Mikroben, Microcyclus aquaticus, mit eigentümlicher Morphologie. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Parasitenkd. Infektionskr. Hyg. Abt. 1 Orig. 107:180–184
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Raj H. D. 1981; The genus Microcyclus and related bacteria. 630–644 Starr M. P., Stolp H., Trüper H. G., Balows A., Schlegel H. G. The prokaryotes—a handbook on habitats, isolation and identification of bacteria Springer-Verlag Inc; New York:
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Saccardo P. A. 1905 Pyrenomyceteae, Dothideaceae, Hyalodidymae, Microcyclus,844–845 Sylloge fungorum omnium hucusque cognitorum. Supplementum universale 176 Sumptibus P.A. Saccardo; Patavii:
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Skerman V. B. D., McGowan V., Sneath P. H. A. 1980; Approved lists of bacterial names. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 30:225–240
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Sydow H. 1904; Novae fungorum species. Ann. Mycol. 2:165–166
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Weibel E. 1887; Untersuchungen über vibrionen. Zentralbl. Bacteriol. Parasitenkd. Infektionskr. Hyg. Abt. I 16:465–472
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Weibel E. 1888; Untersuchungen über Vibrionen. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Parasitenkd. Infektionskr. Hyg. Abt. II 8:225–233
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Weibel E. 1888; Untersuchungen über Vibrionen. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Parasitenkd. Infektionskr. Hyg. Abt. II 9:257–265
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Weibel E. 1888; Untersuchungen über Vibrionen. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Parasitenkd. Infektionskr. Hyg. Abt. II 10:289–295
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-33-2-397
Loading

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error