1887

Journal of Medical Microbiology logo

Volume 71, Issue 6

Disinfection methods of dental unit waterlines contamination: a systematic review No Access

Abstract

Severe contamination of dental unit waterlines was found in healthcare settings. The benefits of decontamination methods are controversial. The aim of this review was to systematically evaluate disinfection methods in contamination control of dental unit waterlines.

The terms ‘dental unit waterline(s) or DUWL(s) or dental unit water line(s)’ were searched through PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science and Scopusup to 31 May 2021. The DUWLs’ output water was incubated on R2A agar at 20–28 °C for 5–7 days to evaluate heterotrophic mesophilic bacteria. The risk of bias was evaluated by a modified Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale.

Eighteen papers from the literature were included. One study indicated that water supply played a crucial role in disinfecting DUWLs. Three studies indicated that flushing decreased bacteria counts but did not meet the American CDC standard (500 c.f.u. ml). All chlorine- and peroxide-containing disinfectants except sodium hypochlorite in one of 15 studies as well as three mouthrinses and citrus botanical extract achieved the standard (≤500 c.f.u. ml). The included studies were of low (1/18), moderate (6/18) and high (11/18) quality.

Independent water reservoirs are recommended for disinfecting DUWLs using distilled water. Flushing DUWLs should be combined with disinfections. Nearly all the chlorine-, chlorhexidine- and peroxide-containing disinfectants, mouthrinses and citrus botanical extract meet the standard for disinfecting DUWLs. Alkaline peroxide would lead to tube blockage in the DUWLs. Regularly changing disinfectants can reduce the risk of occurrence of disinfectant-resistant strains of microbes.

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): decontamination , dental unit water line(s) , dental unit waterline(s) and disinfection
© 2022 The Authors
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001540
2022-06-06
2024-05-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Coleman DC, O’Donnell MJ, Shore AC, Swan J, Russell RJ. The role of manufacturers in reducing biofilms in dental chair waterlines. J Dent 2007; 35:701–711 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. O’Donnell MJ, Boyle MA, Russell RJ, Coleman DC. Management of dental unit waterline biofilms in the 21st century. Future Microbiol 2011; 6:1209–1226 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Coleman DC, O’Donnell MJ, Shore AC, Russell RJ. Biofilm problems in dental unit water systems and its practical control. J Appl Microbiol 2009; 106:1424–1437 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Blake GC. The incidence and control of bacterial infection in dental spray reservoirs. Br Dent J 1963; 115:413–416
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Belting CM, Haberfelde GC, Juhl LK. Spread of organisms from dental air rotor. J Am Dent Assoc 1964; 68:648–651 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Baudet A, Lizon J, Martrette J-M, Camelot F, Florentin A et al. Dental unit waterlines: a survey of practices in Eastern France. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019; 16:4242 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Ji X-Y, Fei C-N, Zhang Y, Liu J, Liu H et al. Three key factors influencing the bacterial contamination of dental unit waterlines: a 6-year survey from 2012 to 2017. Int Dent J 2019; 69:192–199 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Ji X-Y, Fei C-N, Zhang Y, Zhang W, Liu J et al. Evaluation of bacterial contamination of dental unit waterlines and use of a newly designed measurement device to assess retraction of a dental chair unit. Int Dent J 2016; 66:208–214 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Szymańska J, Sitkowska J. Bacterial contamination of dental unit waterlines. Environ Monit Assess 2013; 185:3603–3611 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Szymańska J, Sitkowska J. Evaluation of activities aimed at preventing microbiological risks in dental practice. Med Pr 2013; 64:11–17 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Szymańska J. Bacterial contamination of water in dental unit reservoirs. Ann Agric Environ Med 2007; 14:137–140 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Barbot V, Robert A, Rodier MH, Imbert C. Update on infectious risks associated with dental unit waterlines. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2012; 65:196–204 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Mills SE. The dental unit waterline controversy: defusing the myths, defining the solutions. J Am Dent Assoc 2000; 131:1427–1441 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Costa D, Mercier A, Gravouil K, Lesobre J, Delafont V et al. Pyrosequencing analysis of bacterial diversity in dental unit waterlines. Water Res 2015; 81:223–231 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Barbeau J. Lawsuit against a dentist related to serious ocular infection possibly linked to water from a dental handpiece. J Can Dent Assoc 2007; 73:618–622
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Reasoner DJ, Geldreich EE. A new medium for the enumeration and subculture of bacteria from potable water. Appl Environ Microbiol 1985; 49:1–7 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Bartoloni JA, Porteous NB, Zarzabal LA. Measuring the validity of two in-office water test kits. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137:363–371 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Reasoner DJ. Heterotrophic plate count methodology in the United States. Int J Food Microbiol 2004; 92:307–315 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Baird RB. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water. Twenty-third ed: 9215 Heterotrophic Plate Count Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 2017
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Chate RAC. An audit improves the quality of water within the dental unit water lines of general dental practices across the East of England. Br Dent J 2010; 209:E11 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. PRISMA Group Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6:e1000097 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V et al. The newcastle-ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses; 2014
  23. Yabune T, Imazato S, Ebisu S. Inhibitory effect of PVDF tubes on biofilm formation in dental unit waterlines. Dent Mater 2005; 21:780–786 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Kettering JD, Stephens JA, Muñoz-Viveros CA, Naylor WP. Reducing bacterial counts in dental unit waterlines: tap water vs. distilled water. J Contemp Dent Pract 2002; 3:1–11 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Rice EW, Rich WK, Johnson CH, Lye DJ. The role of flushing dental water lines for the removal of microbial contaminants. Public Health Rep 2006; 121:270–274 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Coan LL, Hughes EA, Hudson JC, Palenik CJ. Sampling water from chemically cleaned dental units with detachable power scalers. J Dent Hyg 2007; 81:80
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Kettering JD, Stephens JA, Muñoz-Viveros CA, Naylor WP. Reducing bacterial counts in dental unit waterlines: tap water vs. distilled water. J Contemp Dent Pract 2002; 3:1–11 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Montebugnoli L, Chersoni S, Prati C, Dolci G. A between-patient disinfection method to control water line contamination and biofilm inside dental units. J Hosp Infect 2004; 56:297–304 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Montebugnoli L, Dolci G. A new chemical formulation for control of dental unit water line contamination: An “in vitro” and clinical “study.”. BMC Oral Health 2002; 2:1 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Porteous NB, Partida MN. The effect of frequent clinical use of dental unit waterlines on contamination. N Y State Dent J 2009; 75:20–24
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Tuttlebee CM, O’Donnell MJ, Keane CT, Russell RJ, Sullivan DJ et al. Effective control of dental chair unit waterline biofilm and marked reduction of bacterial contamination of output water using two peroxide-based disinfectants. J Hosp Infect 2002; 52:192–205 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhang W, Onyango O, Lin Z, Lee SS, Li Y. Evaluation of sterilox for controlling microbial biofilm contamination of dental water. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2007; 28:590–592
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Bansal R, Puttaiah R, Harris R, Reddy A. Evaluation of two methods in controlling dental treatment water contamination. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011; 12:73–83 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Barbeau J, Tanguay R, Faucher E, Avezard C, Trudel L et al. Multiparametric analysis of waterline contamination in dental units. Appl Environ Microbiol 1996; 62:3954–3959 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Epstein JB, Dawson JR, Buivids IA, Wong B, Le ND. The effect of a disinfectant/coolant irrigant on microbes isolated from dental unit water lines. Spec Care Dentist 2002; 22:137–141 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Ozalpl M, Bulut OE, Atac AS, Ekizoglu M, Kart D et al. The effect of hydrogen peroxide/colloidal silver on reducing the colonization and growth of heterotrophic bacteria in dental unit waterlines. Turk J Biol 2013; 37:336–341 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Pawar A, Garg S, Mehta S, Dang R. Breaking the chain of infection: dental unit water quality control. J Clin Diagn Res 2016; 10:ZC80–4 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Porteous NB, Cooley RL. Reduction of bacterial levels in dental unit waterlines. Quintessence Int 2004; 35:630–634 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Porteous NB, Cooley RL, Lau CA. The efficacy of a continuous-use stabilized chlorine dioxide dental unit waterline cleaner and the evaluation of two water sampling methods. Gen Dent 2003; 51:quiz
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhu C, Hong FH, Yu X. Anti biofilm effect of low concentration chlorine containing disinfectant assisted by multi enzyme detergent in dental unit waterlines. New Microbiol 2021; 44:117–124 [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Fleres G, Couto N, Lokate M, van der Sluis LWM, Ginevra C et al. Detection of Legionella Anisa in Water from Hospital Dental Chair Units and Molecular Characterization by Whole-Genome Sequencing. Microorganisms 2018; 6:E71 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Estrich CG, Gruninger SE, Lipman RD. Rates and predictors of exposure to Legionella pneumophila in the United States among dental practitioners: 2002 through 2012. J Am Dent Assoc 2017; 148:164–171 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Petti S. The chicken-egg dilemma: legionnaires’ disease and retrograde contamination of dental unit waterlines. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016; 37:1258–1260 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Vincent AT, Freschi L, Jeukens J, Kukavica-Ibrulj I, Emond-Rheault J-G et al. Genomic characterisation of environmental Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from dental unit waterlines revealed the insertion sequence ISPa11 as a chaotropic element. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2017; 93: [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Lizzadro J, Mazzotta M, Girolamini L, Dormi A, Pellati T et al. Comparison between two types of dental unit waterlines: how evaluation of microbiological contamination can support risk containment. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019; 16:328 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Walker RJ, Burke FJT, Miller CH, Palenik CJ. An investigation of the microbial contamination of dental unit air and water lines. Int Dent J 2004; 54:438–444 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Kohn WG, Harte JA, Malvitz DM, Collins AS, Cleveland JL et al. Guidelines for infection control in dental health care settings--2003. J Am Dent Assoc 2004; 135:33–47 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Tambekar DH, Gulhane PB, Goyal KS, Gulhane SR. Prevalence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Dental Unit Water-Lines. Research J of Microbiology 2007; 2:983–987 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Mavridou A, Kamma J, Mandilara G, Delaportas P, Komioti F. Microbial risk assessment of dental unit water systems in general dental practice in Greece. Water Sci Technol 2006; 54:269–273 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  50. ADA ADA statement on dental unit waterlines. JADA 1996; 127:185–186 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Spagnolo AM, Sartini M, Cristina ML. Microbial contamination of dental unit waterlines and potential risk of infection: a narrative review. Pathogens 2020; 9:E651 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Fiehn NE, Larsen T. The effect of drying dental unit waterline biofilms on the bacterial load of dental unit water. Int Dent J 2002; 52:251–254 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Watanabe A, Tamaki N, Yokota K, Matsuyama M, Kokeguchi S. Monitoring of bacterial contamination of dental unit water lines using adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence. J Hosp Infect 2016; 94:393–396 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Alkhulaifi MM, Alotaibi DH, Alajlan H, Binshoail T. Assessment of nosocomial bacterial contamination in dental unit waterlines: Impact of flushing. Saudi Dent J 2020; 32:68–73 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Costa D, Girardot M, Bertaux J, Verdon J, Imbert C. Efficacy of dental unit waterlines disinfectants on a polymicrobial biofilm. Water Res 2016; 91:38–44 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Kim PJ, Cederberg RA, Puttaiah R. A pilot study of 2 methods for control of dental unit biofilms. Quintessence Int 2000; 31:41–48 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Karpay RI, Plamondon TJ, Mills SE, Dove SB. Combining periodic and continuous sodium hypochlorite treatment to control biofilms in dental unit water systems. J Am Dent Assoc 1999; 130:957–965 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Wirthlin MR, Marshall GW, Rowland RW. Formation and decontamination of biofilms in dental unit waterlines. J Periodontol 2003; 74:1595–1609 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Zemouri C, Laheij AMGA, Volgenant CMC, Brandt BW, Crielaard W et al. Chlorine-based DUWL disinfectant leads to a different microbial composition of water derived biofilms compared to H2O2-based chemical disinfectants in vitro. PeerJ 2020; 8:e9503 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Tuvo B, Totaro M, Cristina ML, Spagnolo AM, Di Cave D et al. Prevention and Control of Legionella and Pseudomonas spp. colonization in dental units. Pathogens 2020; 9:305 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Schel AJ, Marsh PD, Bradshaw DJ, Finney M, Fulford MR et al. Comparison of the efficacies of disinfectants to control microbial contamination in dental unit water systems in general dental practices across the European Union. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006; 72:1380–1387 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Roberts HW, Karpay RI, Mills SE. Dental unit waterline antimicrobial agents’ effect on dentin bond strength. J Am Dent Assoc 2000; 131:179–183 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Rowland BM. Bacterial contamination of dental unit waterlines: What is your dentist spraying into your mouth?. Clinical Microbiology Newsletter 2003; 25:73–77 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Smith AJ, Bagg J, Hood J. Use of chlorine dioxide to disinfect dental unit waterlines. J Hosp Infect 2001; 49:285–288 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  65. O’Donnell MJ, Shore AC, Coleman DC. A novel automated waterline cleaning system that facilitates effective and consistent control of microbial biofilm contamination of dental chair unit waterlines: A one-year study. J Dent 2006; 34:648–661 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Leoni E, Dallolio L, Stagni F, Sanna T, D’Alessandro G et al. Impact of a risk management plan on Legionella contamination of dental unit water. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2015; 12:2344–2358 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Zemouri C, de Soet JJ, Volgenant CMC, Crielaard W, Laheij AMGA. Heterogeneity in the efficacy of dental chemical disinfectants on water-derived biofilms in vitro. Biofouling 2020; 36:587–596 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Benjamin E, Pickles J. Chlorine-induced anosmia. A case presentation. J Laryngol Otol 1997; 111:1075–1076 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Marshall MV, Cancro LP, Fischman SL. Hydrogen peroxide: a review of its use in dentistry. J Periodontol 1995; 66:786–796 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Fujita M, Mashima I, Nakazawa F. Monitoring the decontamination efficacy of the novel Poseidon-S disinfectant system in dental unit water lines. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2017; 50:270–276 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Kohno S, Kawata T, Kaku M, Fuita T, Tsutsui K et al. Bactericidal effects of acidic electrolyzed water on the dental unit waterline. Jpn J Infect Dis 2004; 57:52–54 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Hricova D, Stephan R, Zweifel C. Electrolyzed water and its application in the food industry. J Food Prot 2008; 71:1934–1947 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Noopan S, Unchui P, Techotinnakorn S, Ampornaramveth RS. Plasma sterilization effectively reduces bacterial contamination in dental unit waterlines. Int J Dent 2019; 2019:5720204 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Gitipour A, Al-Abed SR, Thiel SW, Scheckel KG, Tolaymat T. Nanosilver as a disinfectant in dental unit waterlines: Assessment of the physicochemical transformations of the AgNPs. Chemosphere 2017; 173:245–252 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Cheng L, Naibijiang N, Hasenbai A, Dong H, He H. Bacteriostatic effects of nanometer silver disinfectant on the biofilms in dental unit water lines. J Dent Sci 2021; 16:327–332 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Offner D, Musset AM. An evaluation of two systems for the management of the microbiological quality of water in dental unit waterlines: hygowater® and IGN Calbénium®. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18:5477 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Claesson R, Edwardsson S, Bäckman N. Microbial contamination of dental unit water lines - a matter of following instructions. J Hosp Infect 2021; 113:187–188 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Volgenant CMC, Persoon IF. Microbial water quality management of dental unit water lines at a dental school. J Hosp Infect 2019; 103:e115–e117 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Bagga BS, Murphy RA, Anderson AW, Punwani I. Contamination of dental unit cooling water with oral microorganisms and its prevention. J Am Dent Assoc 1984; 109:712–716 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Montebugnoli L, Sambri V, Cavrini F, Marangoni A, Testarelli L et al. Detection of DNA from periodontal pathogenic bacteria in biofilm obtained from waterlines in dental units. New Microbiol 2004; 27:391–397 [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Petti S, Tarsitani G. Detection and quantification of dental unit water line contamination by oral streptococci. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006; 27:504–509 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Berlutti F, Testarelli L, Vaia F, De Luca M, Dolci G. Efficacy of anti-retraction devices in preventing bacterial contamination of dental unit water lines. J Dent 2003; 31:105–110 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Copenhagen TL. The effect of ultrafiltration on the quality of water from dental units. Int Dent J 2006; 56:352–355 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Mayo JA, Brown CE. Effect of in-line bacteriological filters on numbers of heterotrophic bacteria in water emitted from non-autoclavable dental air-water syringes. Am J Dent 1999; 12:256–260 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Pankhurst CL, Philpott-Howard JN, Hewitt JH, Casewell MW. The efficacy of chlorination and filtration in the control and eradication of Legionella from dental chair water systems. J Hosp Infect 1990; 16:9–18 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Walker JT, Marsh PD. Microbial biofilm formation in DUWS and their control using disinfectants. J Dent 2007; 35:721–730 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Sacchetti R, De Luca G, Zanetti F. Influence of material and tube size on DUWLs contamination in a pilot plant. New Microbiol 2007; 30:29–34 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Luo J, Porteous N, Sun Y. Rechargeable biofilm-controlling tubing materials for use in dental unit water lines. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2011; 3:2895–2903 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Porteous N, Dang S, Schoolfield J, Sun Y. Evaluation of the antimicrobial functions of n-halamine dental unit waterline tubing for one year. J Clin Dent 2016; 27:19–22 [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Pantanella F, Schippa S, Solimini A, Rosa L, Bettucci A et al. Efficacy of acoustic waves in preventing Streptococcus mutans adhesion on dental unit water line. Ann Ig 2019; 31:109–116 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001540
Loading
Disinfection methods of dental unit waterlines contamination: a systematic review
J. Med. Microbiol. 71, 001540 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001540
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001540
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001540
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error