1887

Abstract

The taxonomic position of strain BMG 8361, isolated from sandstone collected in the Sahara Desert of Southern Tunisia, was refined through a polyphasic taxonomic investigation. Colonies of BMG 8361 were pale-orange coloured, irregular with a dry surface and produced a diffusible pink or brown pigment depending on media. The Gram-positive cells were catalase-positive and oxidase-negative. The strain exhibited growth at 10–40 °C and pH values ranging from 5.5 to 9.0, with optima at 28–35 °C and pH 6.5–8.0. Additionally, BMG 8361 demonstrated the ability to grow in the presence of up to 1 % NaCl (w/v) concentration. The peptidoglycan of the cell wall contained -diaminopimelic acid, glucose, galactose, xylose, ribose, and rhamnose. The predominant menaquinones consisted of MK-9(H) and MK-9. The main polar lipids were phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylinositol, glycophosphatidylinositol, diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, and two unidentified lipids. Major cellular fatty acids were iso-C, iso-C h, and C 8. Phylogenetic analyses based on both the 16S rRNA gene and whole-genome sequences assigned strain BMG 8361 within the genus . The highest pairwise sequence similarity observed in the 16S rRNA gene was 99.5 % with AT 7-14. However, when considering digital DNA–DNA hybridization and average nucleotide identity, the highest values, 48.4 and 86.58 %, respectively, were obtained with BMG 822. These values significantly undershoot the recommended thresholds for establishing new species, corroborating the robust support for the distinctive taxonomic status of strain BMG 8361 within the genus . In conjunction with the phenotyping results, this compelling evidence leads to the proposal of a novel species we named sp. nov. with BMG 8361 (=DSM 46845=CECT 8880) as the type strain.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006317
2024-04-03
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahrens R, Moll G. Ein neues knospendes Bakterium aus der Ostsee. Archiv Mikrobiol 1970; 70:243–265 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Urzì C, Salamone P, Schumann P, Rohde M, Stackebrandt E. Blastococcus saxobsidens sp. nov., and emended descriptions of the genus Blastococcus Ahrens and Moll 1970 and Blastococcus aggregatus Ahrens and Moll 1970. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:253–259 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hezbri K, Louati M, Nouioui I, Gtari M, Rohde M et al. Blastococcus capsensis sp. nov., isolated from an archaeological roman pool and emended description of the genus Blastococcus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:4864–4872 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hezbri K, Nouioui I, Rohde M, Schumann P, Gtari M et al. Blastococcus colisei sp. nov, isolated from an archaeological amphitheatre. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:339–346 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hezbri K, Nouioui I, Rohde M, Spröer C, Schumann P et al. Blastococcus xanthinilyticus sp. nov., isolated from monument. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:1177–1183 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Louati M, Hezbri K, Montero-Calasanz MDC, Rohde M, Göker M et al. Blastococcus tunisiensis sp. nov., isolated from limestone collected in Tunisia. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kammoun I, Hezbri K, Sbissi I, Del Carmen Montero-Calasanz M, Klenk H-P et al. Blastococcus carthaginiensis sp. nov., isolated from a monument sampled in Carthage, Tunisia. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73:006178 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Montero-Calasanz MDC, Yaramis A, Rohde M, Schumann P, Klenk H-P et al. Genotype-phenotype correlations within the Geodermatophilaceae. Front Microbiol 2022; 13:975365 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Castro JF, Nouioui I, Sangal V, Choi S, Yang SJ et al. Blastococcus atacamensis sp. nov., a novel strain adapted to life in the Yungay core region of the Atacama Desert. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:2712–2721 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Yang ZW, Asem MD, Li X, Li LY, Salam N et al. Blastococcus deserti sp. nov., isolated from a desert sample. Arch Microbiol 2019; 201:193–198 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Essoussi I, Ghodhbane-Gtari F, Amairi H, Sghaier H, Jaouani A et al. Esterase as an enzymatic signature of Geodermatophilaceae adaptability to Sahara desert stones and monuments. J Appl Microbiol 2010; 108:1723–1732 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Luedemann GM. Geodermatophilus, a new genus of the Dermatophilaceae (Actinomycetales). J Bacteriol 1968; 96:1848–1858 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Reasoner DJ, Blannon JC, Geldreich EE. Rapid seven-hour fecal coliform test. Appl Environ Microbiol 1979; 38:229–236 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Shirling EB, Gottlieb D. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1966; 16:313–334 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gregersen T. Rapid method for distinction of gram-negative from Gram-positive bacteria. European J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1978; 5:123–127 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Cross T. Growth and examination of actinomycetes-some guidelines. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology vol 4 Springer; 1989 pp 2340–2343
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gordon RE, Smith MM. Proposed group of characters for the separation of Streptomyces and Nocardia. J Bacteriol 1955; 69:147–150 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Clarke SK. A simplified plate method for detecting gelatine-liquefying bacteria. J Clin Pathol 1953; 6:246–248 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Swan A. The use of a bile-aesculin medium and of Maxted’s technique of Lancefield grouping in the identification of enterococci (group D streptococci). J Clin Pathol 1954; 7:160–163 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kroppenstedt R, Goodfellow M. The family Thermomonosporaceae: Actinocorallia, Actinomadura, Spirillispora and Thermomonospora. In The Prokaryotes vol 3 New York, NY, USA: Springer; 2006 pp 682–724 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Tindall BJ. A comparative study of the lipid composition of Halobacterium saccharovorum from various sources. Syst Appl Microbiol 1990; 13:128–130 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Skipski VP, Peterson RF, Barclay M. Quantitative analysis of phospholipids by thin-layer chromatography. Biochem J 1964; 90:374–378 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lechevalier MP, Lechevalier H. Chemical composition as a criterion in the classification of aerobic actinomycetes. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1970; 20:435–443 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Staneck JL, Roberts GD. Simplified approach to identification of aerobic actinomycetes by thin-layer chromatography. Appl Microbiol 1974; 28:226–231 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Collins MD, Pirouz T, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Distribution of menaquinones in actinomycetes and corynebacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1977; 100:221–230 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kroppenstedt RM. Separation of bacterial menaquinones by HPLC using reverse phase (RP18) and a silver loaded Ion exchanger as stationary phases. J Liq Chromatogr 1982; 5:2359–2367 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Schleifer KH, Kandler O. Peptidoglycan types of bacterial cell walls and their taxonomic implications. Bacteriol Rev 1972; 36:407–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Sasser M. Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. USFCC Newsl 1990; 20:16
    [Google Scholar]
  30. William S, Feil H, Copeland A. Bacterial genomic DNA isolation using CTAB. Sigma 2012; 50:
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol 2019; 37:540–546 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Vaser R, Sović I, Nagarajan N, Šikić M. Fast and accurate de novo genome assembly from long uncorrected reads. Genome Res 2017; 27:737–746 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP et al. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:6614–6624 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D801–D807 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lefort V, Desper R, Gascuel O. FastME 2.0: a comprehensive, accurate, and fast distance-based phylogeny inference program. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:2798–2800 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Alipour M, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Moret BME, Stamatakis A. How many bootstrap replicates are necessary?. J Comput Biol 2010; 17:337–354 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Yoon S-H, Ha S, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Wayne LG, Brenner DJ, Colwell RR et al. International committee on systematic bacteriology. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1987; 37:463–464 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Lee SA, Kim HS, Sang MK, Song J, Weon HY. Effect of Bacillus mesonae H20-5 treatment on rhizospheric bacterial community of tomato plants under salinity stress. Plant Pathol J 2021; 37:662–672 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang X, Dai Z, Zhao H, Hu L, Dahlgren RA et al. Heavy metal effects on multitrophic level microbial communities and insights for ecological restoration of an abandoned electroplating factory site. Environmental Pollution 2023; 327:121548 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhao Y, Duan FA, Cui Z, Hong J, Ni SQ. Insights into the vertical distribution of the microbiota in steel plant soils with potentially toxic elements and PAHs contamination after 60 years operation: abundance, structure, co-occurrence network and functionality. Sci Total Environ 2021; 786:147338 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Liu Z, Yang Y, Ji S, Dong D, Li Y et al. Effects of elevation and distance from highway on the abundance and community structure of bacteria in soil along Qinghai-Tibet highway. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18:13137 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. An M, Chang D, Hong D, Fan H, Wang K. Metabolic regulation in soil microbial succession and niche differentiation by the polymer amendment under cadmium stress. J Hazard Mater 2021; 416:126094 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Siebielec S, Siebielec G, Sugier P, Woźniak M, Grządziel J et al. Activity and diversity of microorganisms in root zone of plant species spontaneously inhabiting smelter waste piles. Molecules 2020; 25:5638 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Li S, Wu J, Huo Y, Zhao X, Xue L. Profiling multiple heavy metal contamination and bacterial communities surrounding an iron tailing pond in Northwest China. Sci Total Environ 2021; 752:141827 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Zeng XY, Li SW, Leng Y, Kang XH. Structural and functional responses of bacterial and fungal communities to multiple heavy metal exposure in arid loess. Sci Total Environ 2020; 723:138081 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ et al. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:D206–D214 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Aziz RK, Devoid S, Disz T, Edwards RA, Henry CS et al. SEED servers: high-performance access to the SEED genomes, annotations, and metabolic models. PLoS One 2012; 7:e48053 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Sayed AM, Hassan MHA, Alhadrami HA, Hassan HM, Goodfellow M et al. Extreme environments: microbiology leading to specialized metabolites. J Appl Microbiol 2020; 128:630–657 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Reddy S, Sinha A, Osborne WJ. Microbial secondary metabolites: recent developments and technological challenges. In Kumar A, Singh J, Samuel J. eds Volatiles and Metabolites of Microbes London: Academic Press; 2021 pp 1–22
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Al-Shaibani MM, Radin Mohamed RMS, Sidik NM, Enshasy HAE, Al-Gheethi A et al. Biodiversity of secondary metabolites compounds isolated from phylum actinobacteria and its therapeutic applications. Molecules 2021; 26:4504 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Blin K, Shaw S, Augustijn HE, Reitz ZL, Biermann F et al. antiSMASH 7.0: new and improved predictions for detection, regulation, chemical structures and visualisation. Nucleic Acids Res 2023; 51:W46–W50 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006317
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006317
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error