1887

Abstract

A novel aerobic methanotrophic bacterium, designated as strain IN45, was isolated from colonisation systems deployed at the Iheya North deep-sea hydrothermal field in the mid-Okinawa Trough. IN45 was a moderately thermophilic obligate methanotroph that grew only on methane or methanol at temperatures between 25 and 56 °C (optimum 45–50 °C). It was an oval-shaped, Gram-reaction-negative, motile bacterium with a single polar flagellum and an intracytoplasmic membrane system. It required 1.5–4.0 % (w/v) NaCl (optimum 2–3 %) for growth. The major phospholipid fatty acids were Cω7, C and Cω7. The major isoprenoid quinone was Q-8. The 16S rRNA gene sequence comparison revealed 99.1 % sequence identity with IT-9, the only species of the genus with a validly published name within the family . The complete genome sequence of IN45 consisted of a 2.42-Mbp chromosome (DNA G+C content, 64.1 mol%) and a 20.5-kbp plasmid. The genome encodes genes for particulate methane monooxygenase and two types of methanol dehydrogenase ( and ). Genes involved in the ribulose monophosphate pathway for carbon assimilation are encoded, but the transaldolase gene was not found. The genome indicated that IN45 performs partial denitrification of nitrate to NO, and its occurrence was indirectly confirmed by NO production in cultures grown with nitrate. Genomic relatedness indices between the complete genome sequences of IN45 and IT-9, such as digital DNA–DNA hybridisation (51.2 %), average nucleotide identity (92.94 %) and average amino acid identity (93.21 %), indicated that these two methanotrophs should be separated at the species level. On the basis of these results, strain IN45 represents a novel species, for which we propose the name sp. nov. with IN45 (=JCM 35101 =DSM 113422) as the type strain.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Award 16K07498)
    • Principle Award Recipient: HisakoHirayama
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006288
2024-03-13
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/74/3/ijsem006288.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006288&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Schubert CJ. Methane, origin. Encycl Geobiol 2011578–586 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dubilier N, Bergin C, Lott C. Symbiotic diversity in marine animals: the art of harnessing chemosynthesis. Nat Rev Microbiol 2008; 6:725–740 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dick GJ, Tebo BM. Microbial diversity and biogeochemistry of the Guaymas basin deep-sea hydrothermal plume. Environ Microbiol 2010; 12:1334–1347 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Distel DL, Lee HK, Cavanaugh CM. Intracellular coexistence of methano- and thioautotrophic bacteria in a hydrothermal vent mussel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995; 92:9598–9602 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hirayama H, Takaki Y, Abe M, Imachi H, Ikuta T et al. Multispecies populations of methanotrophic Methyloprofundus and cultivation of a likely dominant species from the Iheya North deep-sea hydrothermal field. Appl Environ Microbiol 2022; 88:e0075821 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Nercessian O, Bienvenu N, Moreira D, Prieur D, Jeanthon C. Diversity of functional genes of methanogens, methanotrophs and sulfate reducers in deep-sea hydrothermal environments. Environ Microbiol 2005; 7:118–132 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Skennerton CT, Ward LM, Michel A, Metcalfe K, Valiente C et al. Genomic reconstruction of an uncultured hydrothermal vent gammaproteobacterial methanotroph (family Methylothermaceae) indicates multiple adaptations to oxygen limitation. Front Microbiol 2015; 6:1425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hirayama H, Abe M, Miyazaki M, Nunoura T, Furushima Y et al. Methylomarinovum caldicuralii gen. nov., sp. nov., a moderately thermophilic methanotroph isolated from a shallow submarine hydrothermal system, and proposal of the family Methylothermaceae fam. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:989–999 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Takeuchi M, Kamagata Y, Oshima K, Hanada S, Tamaki H et al. Methylocaldum marinum sp. nov., a thermotolerant, methane-oxidizing bacterium isolated from marine sediments, and emended description of the genus Methylocaldum. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:3240–3246 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hirayama H, Suzuki Y, Abe M, Miyazaki M, Makita H et al. Methylothermus subterraneus sp. nov., a moderately thermophilic methanotroph isolated from a terrestrial subsurface hot aquifer. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:2646–2653 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Tsubota J, Eshinimaev BT, Khmelenina VN, Trotsenko YA. Methylothermus thermalis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel moderately thermophilic obligate methanotroph from a hot spring in Japan. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:1877–1884 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Heyer J, Berger U, Hardt M, Dunfield PF. Methylohalobius crimeensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a moderately halophilic, methanotrophic bacterium isolated from hypersaline lakes of Crimea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:1817–1826 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Rush D, Osborne KA, Birgel D, Kappler A, Hirayama H et al. The bacteriohopanepolyol inventory of novel aerobic methane oxidising bacteria reveals new biomarker signatures of aerobic methanotrophy in marine systems. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0165635 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lane DJ. eds 16S/23S Sequencing New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1991
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Pruesse E, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. SINA: accurate high-throughput multiple sequence alignment of ribosomal RNA genes. Bioinformatics 2012; 28:1823–1829 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Trifinopoulos J, Nguyen L-T, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. W-IQ-TREE: a fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:W232–5 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods 2017; 14:587–589 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:518–522 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Chin C-S, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J et al. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Methods 2013; 10:563–569 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ruby JG, Bellare P, Derisi JL. PRICE: software for the targeted assembly of components of (meta) genomic sequence data. G3 2013; 3:865–880 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 2014; 9:e112963 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hyatt D, LoCascio PF, Hauser LJ, Uberbacher EC. Gene and translation initiation site prediction in metagenomic sequences. Bioinformatics 2012; 28:2223–2230 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Nawrocki EP, Eddy SR. Infernal 1.1: 100-fold faster RNA homology searches. Bioinformatics 2013; 29:2933–2935 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lowe TM, Chan PP. tRNAscan-SE On-line: integrating search and context for analysis of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:W54–7 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park S-C, Chun J. OrthoANI: an improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1100–1103 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. GTDB-Tk v2: memory friendly classification with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics 2022; 38:5315–5316 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:1312–1313 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:1792–1797 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Buck JD. Nonstaining (KOH) method for determination of Gram reactions of marine bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 1982; 44:992–993 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Steyer AM, Ruhwedel T, Möbius W. Biological sample preparation by high-pressure freezing, microwave-assisted contrast enhancement, and minimal resin embedding for volume imaging. J Vis Exp 2019; 2019:145 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Deerinck TJ, Bushong EA, Thor A, Ellisman MH. NCMIR Methods for 3D EM: A New Protocol for Preparation of Biological Specimens for Serial Block Face Scanning Electron Microscopy 2010
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Met 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Komagata K, Suzuki K-I. Lipid and cell-wall analysis in bacterial systematics. In Colwell RR, Grigorova R. eds Methods Microbiol 19: Academic Press; 1988 pp 161–207
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Sasser M. Bacterial identification by gas chromatographic analysis of fatty acid methyl esters (GC-FAME). In MIDI Technical Note vol 101 Newark, DE: MIDI, Inc; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Christie WW. Structural analysis of fatty acids. In Christie WW. eds Advances in Lipid Methodology - Four Dundee: Oily Press; 1997 pp 119–169
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Kim M, Oh H-S, Park S-C, Chun J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:346–351 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA–DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Konstantinidis KT, Rosselló-Móra R, Amann R. Uncultivated microbes in need of their own taxonomy. ISME J 2017; 11:2399–2406 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Chen KH-C, Wu H-H, Ke S-F, Rao Y-T, Tu C-M et al. Bacteriohemerythrin bolsters the activity of the particulate methane monooxygenase (pMMO) in Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath). J Inorg Biochem 2012; 111:10–17 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Nariya S, Kalyuzhnaya MG. Hemerythrins enhance aerobic respiration in Methylomicrobium alcaliphilum 20ZR, a methane-consuming bacterium. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2020; 367:fnaa003 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Koendjbiharie JG, Hon S, Pabst M, Hooftman R, Stevenson DM et al. The pentose phosphate pathway of cellulolytic clostridia relies on 6-phosphofructokinase instead of transaldolase. J Biol Chem 2020; 295:1867–1878 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Garschagen LS, Franke T, Deppenmeier U. An alternative pentose phosphate pathway in human gut bacteria for the degradation of C5 sugars in dietary fibers. FEBS J 2021; 288:1839–1858 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Nakahara K, Yamamoto H, Miyake C, Yokota A. Purification and characterization of class-I and class-II fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolases from the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Plant Cell Physiol 2003; 44:326–333 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Nakahigashi K, Toya Y, Ishii N, Soga T, Hasegawa M et al. Systematic phenome analysis of Escherichia coli multiple-knockout mutants reveals hidden reactions in central carbon metabolism. Mol Syst Biol 2009; 5:306 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Reshetnikov AS, Rozova ON, Khmelenina VN, Mustakhimov II, Beschastny AP et al. Characterization of the pyrophosphate-dependent 6-phosphofructokinase from Methylococcus capsulatus Bath. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2008; 288:202–210 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Rozova ON, Khmelenina VN, Mustakhimov II, Reshetnikov AS, Trotsenko YA. Characterization of recombinant fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase from Methylococcus capsulatus bath. Biochemistry 2010; 75:892–898 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Rozova ON, Khmelenina VN, Trotsenko YA. Characterization of recombinant PPi-dependent 6-phosphofructokinases from Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b and Methylobacterium nodulans ORS 2060. Biochemistry 2012; 77:288–295 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Stolzenberger J, Lindner SN, Persicke M, Brautaset T, Wendisch VF. Characterization of fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase and sedoheptulose 1,7-bisphosphatase from the facultative ribulose monophosphate cycle methylotroph Bacillus methanolicus. J Bacteriol 2013; 195:5112–5122 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Fan L, Wang Y, Qian J, Gao N, Zhang Z et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals the roles of nitrogen metabolism and sedoheptulose bisphosphatase pathway in methanol-dependent growth of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microb Biotechnol 2021; 14:1797–1808 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Woolston BM, King JR, Reiter M, Van Hove B, Stephanopoulos G. Improving formaldehyde consumption drives methanol assimilation in engineered E. coli. Nat Commun 2018; 9: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Augimeri RV, Varley AJ, Strap JL. Establishing a role for bacterial cellulose in environmental interactions: lessons learned from diverse biofilm-producing proteobacteria. Front Microbiol 2015; 6:1282 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Römling U, Galperin MY. Bacterial cellulose biosynthesis: diversity of operons, subunits, products, and functions. Trends Microbiol 2015; 23:545–557 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Kawagucci S, Miyazaki J, Nakajima R, Nozaki T, Takaya Y et al. Post‐drilling changes in fluid discharge pattern, mineral deposition, and fluid chemistry in the Iheya North hydrothermal field, Okinawa Trough. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 2013; 14:4774–4790 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Balch WE, Fox GE, Magrum LJ, Woese CR, Wolfe RS. Methanogens: reevaluation of a unique biological group. Microbiol Rev 1979; 43:260–296 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Kuwamoto K. Simple and quick quality confirmation method of aqueous urea solution for marine SCR system: evaluation of alkalinity of aqueous urea solution with Laquatwin pH meter. Readout 2019; E52:28–31
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Skiba U. Denitrification. In Jørgensen SE, Fath BD. eds Encyclopedia of Ecology Oxford: Academic Press; 2008 pp 866–871
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Hoefman S, van der Ha D, Boon N, Vandamme P, De Vos P et al. Niche differentiation in nitrogen metabolism among methanotrophs within an operational taxonomic unit. BMC Microbiol 2014; 14:83 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Kits KD, Klotz MG, Stein LY. Methane oxidation coupled to nitrate reduction under hypoxia by the Gammaproteobacterium Methylomonas denitrificans, sp. nov. type strain FJG1. Environ Microbiol 2015; 17:3219–3232 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006288
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006288
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error