1887

Abstract

An obligate anaerobic, Gram-negative, rod-shaped and non-spore-forming bacterium, designated as strain GYB001, was isolated from the blood of a patient with a sigmoid colon perforation. Taxonomic characterization of the novel isolate was performed using a polyphasic approach. A phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene and whole genome sequences revealed that GYB001 represented a member of the genus , in the family . The closest species, based on 16S rRNA sequence, was DSM 23371 with 97.4 % similarity. Average nucleotide identity and digital DNA–DNA hybridization values between strain GYB001 and DSM 23371 were 86.7 and 28.7% and between GYB001 and JCM 18682 were 86.6 and 27.7 %, respectively. The genome was 6.57 Mbp long with 43.3 mol% G+C content. Colonies on Brucella blood agar (BBA) were circular, convex, smooth, grey and small in size. Growth was observed on trypticase soy agar (TSA), TSA +5 % sheep blood and agar. Growth occurred at 18–42 °C on BBA in the presence of 0–3 % NaCl (w/v) and at pH 6.0–8.5. The major polar lipids were phosphatidylethanolamine and phospholipids. The major fatty acids in strain GYB001 were anteiso-C and iso-C 3-OH, and the predominant respiratory quinones were menaquinone-10 (MK-10) and MK-9. The cell wall contained -diaminopimelic acid. Considering these phenotypic features and comparative genome analyses, we propose strain GYB001 as the type strain of sp. nov. (=KCTC 25738=KBN12P06525=LMG 32797).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (Award NRF-2020R1F1A1066895)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Jung-HyunByun
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006187
2023-11-24
2024-05-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/73/11/ijsem006187.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006187&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Sakamoto M, Benno Y. Reclassification of Bacteroides distasonis, Bacteroides goldsteinii and Bacteroides merdae as Parabacteroides distasonis gen. nov., comb. nov., Parabacteroides goldsteinii comb. nov. and Parabacteroides merdae comb. nov. nov Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:1599–1605 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Eggerth AH, Gagnon BH. The Bacteroides of human feces. J Bacteriol 1933; 25:389–413 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Song Y, Liu C, Lee J, Bolanos M, Vaisanen M-L et al. Bacteroides goldsteinii sp. nov.” isolated from clinical specimens of human intestinal origin. J Clin Microbiol 2005; 43:4522–4527 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Sakamoto M, Kitahara M, Benno Y. Parabacteroides johnsonii sp. nov., isolated from human faeces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:293–296 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Sakamoto M, Suzuki N, Matsunaga N, Koshihara K, Seki M et al. Parabacteroides gordonii sp. nov., isolated from human blood cultures. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:2843–2847 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Tan H-Q, Li T-T, Zhu C, Zhang X-Q, Wu M et al. Parabacteroides chartae sp. nov., an obligately anaerobic species from wastewater of a paper mill. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:2613–2617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kitahara M, Sakamoto M, Tsuchida S, Kawasumi K, Amao H et al. Parabacteroides chinchillae sp. nov., isolated from chinchilla (Chincilla lanigera) faeces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:3470–3474 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Sakamoto M, Tanaka Y, Benno Y, Ohkuma M. Parabacteroides faecis sp. nov., isolated from human faeces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:1342–1346 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kim H, Im W-T, Kim M, Kim D, Seo YH et al. Parabacteroides chongii sp. nov., isolated from blood of a patient with peritonitis. J Microbiol 2018; 56:722–726 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang Y-J, Xu X-J, Zhou N, Sun Y, Liu C et al. Parabacteroides acidifaciens sp. nov., isolated from human faeces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:761–766 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu C, Du M-X, Abuduaini R, Yu H-Y, Li D-H et al. Enlightening the taxonomy darkness of human gut microbiomes with a cultured biobank. Microbiome 2021; 9:119 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Buck JD. Nonstaining (KOH) method for determination of Gram reactions of marine bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 1982; 44:992–993 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Weon H-Y, Kim B-Y, Joa J-H, Son J-A, Song M-H et al. Methylobacterium iners sp. nov. and Methylobacterium aerolatum sp. nov., isolated from air samples in Korea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:93–96 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Sasser M. Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. In MIDI Technical Note vol 101 Newark, DE: MIDI Inc; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hiraishi A, Ueda Y, Ishihara J, Mori T. Comparative lipoquinone analysis of influent sewage and activated sludge by high-performance liquid chromatography and photodiode array detection. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1996; 42:457–469 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Minnikin DE, Patel PV, Alshamaony L, Goodfellow M. Polar lipid composition in the classification of Nocardia and related bacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1977; 27:104–117 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Suzuki K-I, Komagata K. Pimelobacter gen. nov., a new genus of coryneform bacteria with LL-diaminopimelic acid in the cell wall. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1983; 29:59–71 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007; 23:2947–2948 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Biol 1971; 20:406–416 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 50:D801–D807 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:1–14 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T et al. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 2008; 9:75 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006187
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006187
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error