1887

Abstract

A novel bacterial strain, GSTT-20 was isolated from an infected, prosthetic endovascular graft explanted from a shepherd in London, United Kingdom. This strain was an aerobic, catalase-positive, oxidase-negative, Gram-stain-negative, motile, curved rod. It grew on blood agar, chocolate agar and MacConkey agar incubated at 37 °C in an aerobic environment after 48 h, appearing as yellow, mucoid colonies. Analysis of the complete 16S rRNA gene sequence showed closest similarity to with 99.6 % identity and with 99.5 % identity. Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequence and phylogenomic analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms within 1530 core genes showed GSTT-20 forms a distinct lineage in the genus of the family . DNA–DNA hybridization assays against GSTT-20 were estimated at 32.1 % for and 31.9 % for . Genome similarity based on average nucleotide identity was 87.50 % when comparing GSTT-20 to . Based on these results, the strain represented a novel species for which the name sp. nov. was proposed. The type strain is GSTT-20 (NCTC 14621=CECT 30390).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (Award RJ112/N027)
    • Principle Award Recipient: JonathanD Edgeworth
  • Medical Research Council (Award MR/W025140/1)
    • Principle Award Recipient: LukeBlagdon Snell
  • Medical Research Council (Award MC_PC_19041)
    • Principle Award Recipient: JonathanD Edgeworth
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006184
2023-12-05
2024-05-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/73/12/ijsem006184.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006184&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Willems A, Ley J, Gillis M, Kersters K. NOTES: comamonadaceae, a new family encompassing the acidovorans rRNA complex, including Variovorax paradoxus gen. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1991445–450 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Davis DH, Doudoroff M, Stanier RY, Mandel M. Proposal to reject the genus Hydrogenomonas: taxonomic implications. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1969; 19:375–390 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Pehl MJ, Jamieson WD, Kong K, Forbester JL, Fredendall RJ et al. Genes that influence swarming motility and biofilm formation in Variovorax paradoxus EPS. PLoS One 2012; 7:e31832 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Yoon J-H, Kang S-J, Oh T-K. Variovorax dokdonensis sp. nov., isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:811–814 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kim B-Y, Weon H-Y, Yoo S-H, Lee S-Y, Kwon S-W et al. Variovorax soli sp. nov., isolated from greenhouse soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:2899–2901 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Jin L, Kim KK, Ahn CY, Oh HM. Variovorax defluvii sp. nov., isolated from sewage. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:1779–1783 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Miwa H, Ahmed I, Yoon J, Yokota A, Fujiwara T. Variovorax boronicumulans sp. nov., a boron-accumulating bacterium isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:286–289 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Im W-T, Liu Q-M, Lee K-J, Kim S-Y, Lee S-T et al. Variovorax ginsengisoli sp. nov., a denitrifying bacterium isolated from soil of a ginseng field. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:1565–1569 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gao J, Yuan M, Wang X, Qiu T, Li J et al. Variovorax guangxiensis sp. nov., an aerobic, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase producing bacterium isolated from banana rhizosphere. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2015; 107:65–72 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kämpfer P, Busse HJ, McInroy JA, Glaeser SP. Variovorax gossypii sp. nov., isolated from Gossypium hirsutum. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:4335–4340 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Nguyen TM, Kim J. Description of Variovorax humicola sp. nov., isolated from a forest topsoil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:2520–2527 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Nguyen TM, Trinh NH, Kim J. Proposal of three novel species of soil bacteria, Variovorax ureilyticus, Variovorax rhizosphaerae, and Variovorax robiniae, in the family Comamonadaceae. J Microbiol 2018; 56:485–492 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Satola B, Wübbeler JH, Steinbüchel A. Metabolic characteristics of the species Variovorax paradoxus. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2013; 97:541–560 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Perdigão Neto LV, Medeiros M, Ferreira SC, Nishiya AS, de Assis DB et al. Polymerase chain reaction targeting 16S ribosomal RNA for the diagnosis of bacterial meningitis after neurosurgery. Clinics 2021; 76:e2284 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Public Health England SMI TP 21: motility test; 2014 www.gov.uk/government/publications/smi-tp-21-motility-test accessed 4 May 2021
  16. Charalampous T, Alcolea-Medina A, Snell LB, Williams TGS, Batra R et al. Evaluating the potential for respiratory metagenomics to improve treatment of secondary infection and detection of nosocomial transmission on expanded COVID-19 intensive care units. Genome Med 2021; 13:182 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol 2019; 37:540–546 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2068–2069 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. O’Leary NA, Wright MW, Brister JR, Ciufo S, Haddad D et al. Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:D733–D745 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 2004; 5:113 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD et al. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol 2020; 37:1530–1534 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:W293–W296 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 2018; 9:1–8 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S et al. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 2015; 31:3691–3693 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006184
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006184
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error