1887

Abstract

A Gram-stain-negative, facultative anaerobic, methylphosphonate-decomposing, motile by a polar flagellum and rod-shaped marine bacterium, designated S4B1, was isolated from the surface seawater collected from the Yongle Atoll (Xisha Islands, PR China). The pairwise alignment showed the highest sequence similarity of 97.5 and 96.6 % to subsp. 12_122_3T3 and HHS02, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene and the phylogenomic analysis of single-copy genes showed that strain S4B1 belonged to the genus and formed a close branch with ZSDZ65. Growth of strain S4B1 occurred at 4–30 °C (optimum, 28 °C), at pH 6.0–8.0 (optimum, pH 7.0) and in the presence of 2–7 % (w/v) NaCl (optimum, 3 %). The predominant fatty acids (>10 %) were C16 : 0, iso-C and summed feature 3 (C 7 or/and C 6). The DNA G+C content of the assembled genomic sequence was 44.3 mol%. Average nucleotide identity (ANI) values between S4B1 and its reference species were lower than the threshold for species delineation (95–96 %), in which its highest ANI value with ZSDZ65 was 87.0 %. DNA–DNA hybridization further showed that strain S4B1 had less than 70 % similarity to its relatives. On the basis of the polyphasic evidence, strain S4B1 is proposed to represent a novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is S4B1 (=KCTC 92311=MCCC 1K06168).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Fund of Key Laboratory of Marine Ecological Conservation and Restoration, Ministry of Natural Resources/ Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Ecological Conservation and Restoration (Award EPR2023001)
    • Principle Award Recipient: XiaoleiWang
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (Award 2021YFC3100503)
    • Principle Award Recipient: WentaoNiu
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award 42006085)
    • Principle Award Recipient: XiaoleiWang
  • Marine S&T Fund of Fujian Province (Award 2021J05094)
    • Principle Award Recipient: XiaoleiWang
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006183
2023-11-24
2024-05-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Jiang C, Tanaka M, Nishikawa S, Mino S, Romalde JL et al. Vibrio Clade 3.0: new Vibrionaceae evolutionary units using genome-based approach. Curr Microbiol 2022; 79:1–15 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhang X, Lin H, Wang X, Austin B. Significance of Vibrio species in the marine organic carbon cycle—A review. Sci China Earth Sci 2018; 61:1357–1368 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Farmer JJ, Michael JJ. Genus I. Vibrio Pacini 1854, 411AL. In Garrity GM. eds Bergey’s Manual of Systematic BacteriologyThe Proteobacteria, Part B, 2nd. edn vol 2 New York: Springer Press; 2005 pp 494–546
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Martínez A, Ventouras L-A, Wilson ST, Karl DM, Delong EF. Metatranscriptomic and functional metagenomic analysis of methylphosphonate utilization by marine bacteria. Front Microbiol 2013; 4:340 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ye W, Wang X, Zhang X-H, Zhang G-L. Methane production in oxic seawater of the western North Pacific and its marginal seas. Limnol Oceanogr 2020; 65:2352–2365 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Li Y, Huang X, Yue W. Environmental quality and management measures in Yongxing island of Xisha, South China sea. Mar Environ Sci 2004; 23:50–53
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhao M, Yu K, Shi Q, Yang H, Riegl B et al. Comparison of coral diversity between big and small atolls: a case study of Yongle atoll and Lingyang reef, Xisha Islands, central of South China Sea. Biodivers Conserv 2017; 26:1143–1159 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang X, Liu J, Liang J, Sun H, Zhang X-H. Spatiotemporal dynamics of the total and active Vibrio spp. populations throughout the Changjiang estuary in China. Environ Microbiol 2020; 22:4438–4455 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Moore ERB, Arnscheidt A, Krüger A, Strömpl C, Mau M et al. Simplified protocols for the preparation of genomic DNA from bacterial cultures. In Molecular Microbial Ecology Manual vol 1 Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1999 pp 1–15
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang Z, Yu T, Xu T, Zhang X-H. Aquimarina pacifica sp. nov., isolated from seawater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:1991–1997 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:4876–4882 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Cerdà-Cuéllar M, Rosselló-Mora RA, Lalucat J, Jofre J, Blanch A. Vibrio scophthalmi sp. nov., a new species from turbot (Scophthalmus maximus). Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:58–61 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang Y, Zhang X-H, Yu M, Wang H, Austin B. Vibrio atypicus sp. nov., isolated from the digestive tract of the Chinese prawn (Penaeus chinensis O’sbeck). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:2517–2523 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Luo R, Liu B, Xie Y, Li Z, Huang W et al. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience 2012; 1:18 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Contreras-Moreira B, Vinuesa P. GET_HOMOLOGUES, a versatile software package for scalable and robust microbial pangenome analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 2013; 79:7696–7701 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Katoh K, Standley SDM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:772–780 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:1972–1973 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lin H, Yu M, Wang X, Zhang X-H. Comparative genomic analysis reveals the evolution and environmental adaptation strategies of vibrios. BMC Genomics 2018; 19:135 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:268–274 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods 2017; 14:587–589 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:518–522 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Guindon S, Dufayard J-F, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W et al. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol 2010; 59:307–321 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:3389–3402 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Tatusov RL, Galperin MY, Natale DA, Koonin EV. The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28:33–36 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Beveridge TJ, Lawrence JR, Murray RG. Sampling and staining for light microscopy. In Methods for General and Molecular Microbiology, 3rd edn. American Society of Microbiology; 2007 pp 19–33 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Tindall BJ, Sikorski J, Smibert RM, Krieg NR et al. Phenotypic characterization and the principles of comparative systematics. In Reddy CA, Beveridge TJ, Breznak JA, Marzluf G, Schmidt TM. eds Methods for General and Molecular Microbiology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 2007 pp 330–393 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Yoon J-H, Lee K-C, Kho YH, Kang KH, Kim C-J et al. Halomonas alimentaria sp. nov., isolated from jeotgal, a traditional Korean fermented seafood. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:123–130 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Sasser M. Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. USFCC News Lett 1990; 20:1–6
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Garcia C, Mesnil A, Tourbiez D, Moussa M, Dubreuil C et al. Vibrio aestuarianus subsp. cardii subsp. nov., pathogenic to the edible cockles Cerastoderma edule in France, and establishment of Vibrio aestuarianus subsp. aestuarianus subsp. nov. and Vibrio aestuarianus subsp. francensis subsp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Balcázar JL, Pintado J, Planas M. Vibrio hippocampi sp. nov., a new species isolated from wild seahorses (Hippocampus guttulatus). FEMS Microbiol Lett 2010; 307:30–34 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Dubert J, Balboa S, Regueira M, González-Castillo A, Gómez-Gil B et al. Vibrio barjaei sp. nov., a new species of the Mediterranei clade isolated in a shellfish hatchery. Syst Appl Microbiol 2016; 39:553–556 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Xu X-W, Wu Y-H, Wang C-S, Oren A, Wu M. Vibrio hangzhouensis sp. nov., isolated from sediment of the East China Sea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:2099–2103 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Chimetto LA, Cleenwerck I, Moreira APB, Brocchi M, Willems A et al. Vibrio variabilis sp. nov. and Vibrio maritimus sp. nov., isolated from Palythoa caribaeorum. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:3009–3015 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Pujalte M-J, Garay E. Proposal of Vibrio mediterranei sp. nov.: a new marine member of the genus Vibrio. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1986; 36:278–281 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Tarazona E, Lucena T, Arahal DR, Macián MC, Ruvira MA et al. Multilocus sequence analysis of putative Vibrio mediterranei strains and description of Vibrio thalassae sp. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 2014; 37:320–328 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Guo R, Yuan Y, Liu R, Hong W, Zhou Y et al. Vibrio paucivorans sp. nov. and Vibrio qingdaonensis sp. nov., two marine bacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006183
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006183
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error