1887

Abstract

A Gram-positive, motile, aerobic, rod-shaped, endospore-forming strain designated IRB4-01 was isolated from fermented African locust beans (Iru) obtained from Bodija market in the city of Ibadan, southwestern Nigeria, during a screening process from food-related sources. IRB4-01 grew at 10–50 °C (optimum, 35–37 °C), pH 6–10 (optimum, pH 7) and in 0–6 % NaCl (optimum, 1–3 %). Phylogenetic analyses based on 16S rRNA and combined short- and long-read genome sequencing revealed that IRB4-01 is closely related to SYSU K30005 and 10a. The cell-wall peptidoglycan type was A4α (Lys–Asp), containing the diagnostic diamino acid lysine. The major polar lipids in strain IRB4-01 were diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol and an unidentified phospholipid, while the predominant menaquinone was MK-7. The major cellular fatty acids were iso-C, anteiso-C and iso-C. Genomic DNA G+C content was 37.4  mol%, while the digital DNA–DNA hybridization revealed 33.6 and 32.3 % relatedness to SYSU K30005 and 10a, respectively. Based on phenotypic, physiological and chemotaxonomic characteristics, as well as genome comparisons, strain IRB4-01 represents a novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is IRB4-01 (NCIMB 15452=LMG 32887). Hybrid genome data are provided on the NCBI database using the Bioproject number PRJNA906010 and accession numbers CP113527 and CP113528. Additionally, a representative 16S rRNA sequence is available with the GenBank accession number OQ566940.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • DAAD (Award STIBET Doktoranden)
    • Principle Award Recipient: StephenOlusanmi Akintayo
  • Bayer Foundation (Award F-2018-BS-0260)
    • Principle Award Recipient: StephenOlusanmi Akintayo
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006167
2023-11-09
2024-05-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/73/11/ijsem006167.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006167&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ahmed I, Yokota A, Yamazoe A, Fujiwara T. Proposal of Lysinibacillus boronitolerans gen. nov. sp. nov., and transfer of Bacillus fusiformis to Lysinibacillus fusiformis comb. nov. and Bacillus sphaericus to Lysinibacillus sphaericus comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:1117–1125 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Burkett-Cadena M, Sastoque L, Cadena J, Dunlap CA. Lysinibacillus capsici sp. nov, isolated from the rhizosphere of a pepper plant. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2019; 112:1161–1167 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Sun JQ, Xu L, Wu XL. Isolated from saline-alkaline soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:67–71 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kämpfer P, Martin K, Glaeser SP. Lysinibacillus contaminans sp. nov., isolated from surface water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:3148–3153 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Akintayo SO, Treinen C, Vahidinasab M, Pfannstiel J, Bertsche U et al. Exploration of surfactin production by newly isolated Bacillus and Lysinibacillus strains from food-related sources. Lett Appl Microbiol 2022; 75:378–387 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ahsan N, Shimizu M. Lysinibacillus species: their potential as effective bioremediation, biostimulant, and biocontrol agents. RAS 2021; 9:103–116 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hernández-Santana A, Gómez-Garzón C, Dussán J. Lysinibacillus sphaericus. Trends Microbiol 2022; 30:705–706 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Silva Filha M, Berry C, Regis L. Lysinibacillus sphaericus: toxins and mode of action, applications for mosquito control and resistance management. Adv In Insect Phys 2014; 47:89–176 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Farrugia C, Borg RP, Ferrara L, Buhagiar J. The application of Lysinibacillus sphaericus for surface treatment and crack healing in mortar. Front Built Environ 2019; 5:62 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Wu X, Zhou H, Li L, Wang E, Zhou X et al. Whole genome sequencing and comparative genomic analyses of Lysinibacillus pakistanensis LZH-9, a halotolerant strain with excellent COD removal capability. Microorganisms 2020; 8:716 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP et al. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:6614–6624 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt H-H, Rognes T et al. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:3100–3108 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 2009; 10:1–9 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:1–14 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Holland BR, Huber KT, Dress A, Moulton V. Delta plots: a tool for analyzing phylogenetic distance data. Mol Biol Evol 2002; 19:2051–2059 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Auch AF, Henz SR, Holland BR, Göker M. Genome BLAST distance phylogenies inferred from whole plastid and whole mitochondrion genome sequences. BMC Bioinformatics 2006; 7:350 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:929–931 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D801–D807 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Johnson JS, Spakowicz DJ, Hong B-Y, Petersen LM, Demkowicz P et al. Evaluation of 16S rRNA gene sequencing for species and strain-level microbiome analysis. Nat Commun 2019; 10:5029 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ et al. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:D206–14 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Blin K, Shaw S, Kloosterman AM, Charlop-Powers Z, van Wezel GP et al. antiSMASH 6.0: improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:W29–W35 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Henry CS, DeJongh M, Best AA, Frybarger PM, Linsay B et al. High-throughput generation, optimization and analysis of genome-scale metabolic models. Nat Biotechnol 2010; 28:977–982 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Smibert RM, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization. In Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR. eds Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994 pp 607–654
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kovacs N. Identification of Pseudomonas pyocyanea by the oxidase reaction. Nature 1956; 178:703 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Geissler M, Kühle I, Morabbi Heravi K, Altenbuchner J, Henkel M et al. Evaluation of surfactin synthesis in a genome reduced Bacillus subtilis strain. AMB Expr 2019; 9:84 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Bortolaia V, Kaas RS, Ruppe E, Roberts MC, Schwarz S et al. ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J Antimicrob Chemother 2020; 75:3491–3500 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Alcock BP, Raphenya AR, Lau TTY, Tsang KK, Bouchard M et al. CARD 2020: antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res 2020; 48:D517–D525 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Miller LT. Single derivatization method for routine analysis of bacterial whole-cell fatty acid methyl esters, including hydroxy acids. J Clin Microbiol 1982; 16:584–586 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kuykendall LD, Roy MA, O’neill JJ, Devine TE. Fatty acids, antibiotic resistance, and deoxyribonucleic acid homology groups of Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1988; 38:358–361 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Tindall BJ. Lipid composition of Halobacterium lacusprofundi. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1990; 66:199–202 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Tindall BJ. A comparative study of the lipid composition of Halobacterium saccharovorum from various sources. Syst Appl Microbiol 1990; 13:128–130 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Farris JS. Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. Am Nat 1972; 106:645–668 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Tindall BJ, Sikorski J, Smibert RA et al. Phenotypic characterization and the principles of comparative systematics. Method General Mol Microbiol 2014330–393 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Schumann P. Peptidoglycan structure. Method Microbiol 2011; 38:101–129 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lefort V, Desper R, Gascuel O. FastME 2.0: a comprehensive, accurate, and fast distance-based phylogeny inference program. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:2798–2800 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Grant JR, Enns E, Marinier E, Mandal A, Herman EK et al. Proksee: in-depth characterization and visualization of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2023; 51:W484–W492 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Kan Y, Niu X-K, Rao MPN, Dong Z-Y, Xie Y-G et al. Lysinibacillus cavernae sp. nov., isolated from cave soil. Arch Microbiol 2020; 202:1529–1534 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006167
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006167
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error