1887

Abstract

Seal finger (sealer’s finger, spekk finger), an extremely painful hand infection contracted by individuals handling seals, has previously been associated with . From 2000 to 2014, six independent strains of a novel species were isolated at Statens Serum Institut, Denmark, from Scandinavian patients with seal finger (M5725, M6447, M6620, M6642 and M6879) or septic arthritis (M6921). Prior to the onset of infection, all patients had reported contact with unspeciated seals. All isolates grew within 2–5 days in Friis’ modified broth and metabolized glucose and arginine but not urea. Strains M5725, M6447, M6642 and M6921 also grew in Hayflick-type media. Colonies on agar media were large (0.5–1.0 mm) and had a typical ‘fried egg’ appearance, reduced tetrazolium, and were digitonin sensitive. Growth occurred at 32 °C but not at 42 °C. Strains were susceptible to doxycycline and moxifloxacin but resistant to azithromycin and erythromycin. The genomes of the six strains were sequenced and relatedness to all known species was inferred. Phylogenetic analyses using 16S rRNA gene sequences and core genome single nucleotide polymorphisms showed that the isolated strains were highly similar and phylogenetically distinct from all other species within the genus . The sizes of the genome sequences of the strains ranged from 744 321 to 772409 bp, with a G+C content of 25.0–25.2 mol%. Based on these analyses, we propose a novel species of the genus with the name sp. nov. with the first isolate M5725 (NCTC 14922=DSM 116188) as the proposed type strain and representative strains M6447, M6620, M6642, M6879 and M6921.

  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006163
2023-11-15
2024-10-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/73/11/ijsem006163.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006163&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Volokhov DV, Furtak VA, Blom J, Zagorodnyaya TA, Gao Y et al. Mycoplasma miroungirhinis sp. nov. and Mycoplasma miroungigenitalium sp. nov., isolated from northern elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris), Mycoplasma phocoenae sp. nov., isolated from harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena), and Mycoplasma phocoeninasale sp. nov., isolated from harbour porpoise and California sea lions (Zalophus californianus). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ruhnke HL, Madoff S. Mycoplasma phocidae sp. nov., isolated from harbor seals (Phoca vitulina L.). Int J Syst Bacteriol 1992; 42:211–214 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Giebel J, Meier J, Binder A, Flossdorf J, Poveda JB et al. Mycoplasma phocarhinis sp. nov. and Mycoplasma phocacerebrale sp. nov., two new species from harbor seals (Phoca vitulina L.). Int J Syst Bacteriol 1991; 41:39–44 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker AS, Ruoff KL, Madoff S. Isolation of Mycoplasma species from a patient with seal finger. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 27:1168–1170 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Jansen LC, Justesen US, Roos SM, Dargis R, Jensen JS et al. Seal finger in Denmark diagnosed by PCR-technique. Ugeskr Laeger 2012; 174:426–427 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Marjelund S, Tikkakoski T, Isokangas M, Räisänen S. Magnetic resonance imaging and radiographic findings of seal finger. Acta Radiol 2006; 47:1058–1062 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lewin MR, Knott P, Lo M. Seal finger. Lancet 2004; 364:448 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Westley BP, Horazdovsky RD, Michaels DL, Brown DR. Identification of a novel Mycoplasma species in a patient with septic arthritis of the hip and seal finger. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 62:491–493 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Denoncourt PM. Seal finger. Orthopedics 1991; 14:709–710 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Beck B, Smith TG. Letter: seal finger: an unsolved medical problem in Canada. Can Med Assoc J 1976; 115:105–106 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Panagis K, Apps P, Knight MH. Seal finger: occurrence in Antarctica. S Afr J Antarct Res; 1982 http://alp.lib.sun.ac.za/bitstream/handle/123456789/7604/seal_finger_occurrence_in_antarctica.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  12. Hillenbrand FK. Whale finger and seal finger; their relation to erysipeloid. Lancet 1953; 1:680–681 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Krag ML, Schønheyder HC. Seal fingers and other infections transmitted from seals. Ugeskr Laeger 1996; 158:5015–5017 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bidenknap JH. Spackflegmonen. In Norsh Magazin for Legevidenskaben vol 68 1907 pp 515–523
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Brown DR, Whitcomb RF, Bradbury JM. Revised minimal standards for description of new species of the class Mollicutes (division Tenericutes). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:2703–2719 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Firrao G, Brown DR. International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes. Subcommittee on the taxonomy of Mollicutes: minutes of the meetings, July 15th and 19th 2012, Toulouse, France. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:2361–2364 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lind K, Lindhardt BO, Schütten HJ, Blom J, Christiansen C. Serological cross-reactions between Mycoplasma genitalium and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. J Clin Microbiol 1984; 20:1036–1043 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Jensen JS, Hansen HT, Lind K. Isolation of Mycoplasma genitalium strains from the male urethra. J Clin Microbiol 1996; 34:286–291 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Shepard MC. Culture media for ureaplasmas. In Razin S, Tully JG. eds Methods in Mycoplasmology New York: Academic Press, Inc; 1983 pp 137–146
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Razin S, Tully JG. Methods in mycoplasmology. In Mycoplasma Characterization, 1st. edn vol 1 New York: Academic Press, Inc; 1983
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Jensen JS, Bruun B, Gahrn-Hansen B. Unexpected cross-reaction with Fusobacterium necrophorum in a PCR for detection of mycoplasmas. J Clin Microbiol 1999; 37:828–829 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. van Kuppeveld FJ, van der Logt JT, Angulo AF, van Zoest MJ, Quint WG et al. Genus- and species-specific identification of Mycoplasmas by 16S rRNA amplification. Appl Environ Microbiol 1992; 58:2606–2615 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. van Kuppeveld FJ, van der Logt JT, Angulo AF, van Zoest MJ, Quint WG et al. Genus- and species-specific identification of Mycoplasmas by 16S rRNA amplification. Appl Environ Microbiol 1993; 59:655 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Datcu R, Gesink D, Mulvad G, Montgomery-Andersen R, Rink E et al. Vaginal microbiome in women from greenland assessed by microscopy and quantitative PCR. BMC Infect Dis 2013; 13:480 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Prjibelski A, Antipov D, Meleshko D, Lapidus A, Korobeynikov A. Using SPAdes de novo assembler. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 2020; 70:e102 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Sahl JW, Lemmer D, Travis J, Schupp JM, Gillece JD et al. NASP: an accurate, rapid method for the identification of SNPs in WGS datasets that supports flexible input and output formats. Microb Genom 2016; 2:e000074 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. The enveomics collection: a toolbox for specialized analyses of microbial genomes and metagenomes. PeerJ Preprints 2016; 4:e1900v1 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 50:D801–D807 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ et al. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:D206–D214 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lee I, Chalita M, Ha S-M, Na S-I, Yoon S-H et al. ContEst16S: an algorithm that identifies contaminated prokaryotic genomes using 16S RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2053–2057 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Madeira F, Pearce M, Tivey ARN, Basutkar P, Lee J et al. Search and sequence analysis tools services from EMBL-EBI in 2022. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:W276–W279 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD et al. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol 2020; 37:1530–1534 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:W293–W296 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kim M, Oh H-S, Park S-C, Chun J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:346–351 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Pereyre S, Gonzalez P, De Barbeyrac B, Darnige A, Renaudin H et al. Mutations in 23S rRNA account for intrinsic resistance to macrolides in Mycoplasma hominis and Mycoplasma fermentans and for acquired resistance to macrolides in M. hominis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002; 46:3142–3150 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Prokaryotic taxonomy and phylogeny in the genomic era: advancements and challenges ahead. Curr Opin Microbiol 2007; 10:504–509 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:117–134 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006163
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006163
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error