1887

Abstract

In this study, two novel alkalitolerant strains (FJAT-53046 and FJAT-53715) were isolated from sediment samples collected in Zhangzhou, PR China. Phylogeny based on 16S rRNA gene sequences suggested that strains FJAT-53046 and FJAT-53715 were new members of the genus . The two novel strains showed the highest 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity to DSM 16206, with values of 97.4 and 97.6 %, respectively. The average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) values between the two strains and the reference strain were 77.2 and 79.6 %, 20.9 and 30.2 %, respectively, which were below the prokaryotic species delineation thresholds. The ANI and dDDH values between strains FJAT-53046 and FJAT-53715 were 86.0 and 30.2 %, respectively, suggesting that they belonged to different species in the genus . The major respiratory quinone in both strains was MK-7 and the major cellular fatty acids were anteiso-C and anteiso-C. Diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol and phosphatidylethanolamine were the major polar lipids in both novel strains. Combined with results stemming from the determination of physical and biochemical characteristics, chemical properties, and genome analysis, strains FJAT-53046 and FJAT-53715 are proposed to represent two novel species of the genus , for which the names sp. nov. and sp. nov. are proposed. The type strains are FJAT-53046 (=GDMCC 1.3077=JCM 35611) and FJAT-53715 (=GDMCC 1.3076=JCM 35610), respectively.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Award GJYS202203)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Guo-HongLiu
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award 42007221)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Guo-HongLiu
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006159
2023-11-02
2024-05-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5607–5612 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Nielsen P, Rainey FA, Outtrup H, Priest FG, Fritze D. Comparative 16S rDNA sequence analysis of some alkaliphilic bacilli and the establishment of a sixth rRNA group within the genus Bacillus. FEMS Microbiol Let 1994; 117:61–65 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Nielsen P, Fritze D, Priest FG. Phenetic diversity of alkaliphilic Bacillus strains: proposal for nine new species. Microbiology 1995; 141:1745–1761 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Patel S, Gupta RS. A phylogenomic and comparative genomic framework for resolving the polyphyly of the genus Bacillus: proposal for six new genera of Bacillus species, Peribacillus gen. nov., Cytobacillus gen. nov., Mesobacillus gen. nov., Neobacillus gen. nov., Metabacillus gen. nov. and Alkalihalobacillus gen. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:406–438 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Joshi A, Thite S, Karodi P, Joseph N, Lodha T. Alkalihalobacterium elongatum gen. nov. sp. nov.: an antibiotic-producing bacterium isolated from Lonar lake and reclassification of the genus Alkalihalobacillus into seven novel genera. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:722369 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Narsing Rao MP, Dong ZY, Kan Y, Dong L, Li S et al. Description of Paenibacillus tepidiphilus sp. nov., isolated from a tepid spring. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:1977–1981 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. KOVACS N. Identification of Pseudomonas pyocyanea by the oxidase reaction. Nature 1956; 178:703 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu GH, Narsing Rao MP, Chen QQ, Che JM, Shi H et al. Lederbergia citri sp. nov., and Lederbergia citrisecundus sp. nov., isolated from citrus rhizosphere. Curr Microbiol 2022; 79:107 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 1971; 20:406 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22:4673–4680 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Luo R, Liu B, Xie Y, Li Z, Huang W et al. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience 2012; 1:18 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu GH, Yang S, Tang R, Xie CJ, Zhou SG. Genome analysis and description of three novel diazotrophs Geomonas species isolated from paddy soils. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:801462 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Waite DW, Rinke C, Skarshewski A et al. A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat Biotechnol 2018; 36:996–1004 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2–approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 2010; 5:e9490 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim JM, Kwon SJ, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D801–D807 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kim D, Park S, Chun J. Introducing EzAAI: a pipeline for high throughput calculations of prokaryotic average amino acid identity. J Microbiol 2021; 59:476–480 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Qin QL, Xie BB, Zhang XY, Chen XL, Zhou BC et al. A proposed genus boundary for the prokaryotes based on genomic insights. J Bacteriol 2014; 196:2210–2215 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kanehisa M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M, Sato Y, Morishima K. KEGG: new perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res 2017; 45:D353–D361 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Aramaki T, Blanc-Mathieu R, Endo H, Ohkubo K, Kanehisa M et al. KofamKOALA: KEGG Ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics 2020; 36:2251–2252 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Aliyu H, Lebre P, Blom J, Cowan D, De Maayer P. Phylogenomic re-assessment of the thermophilic genus Geobacillus. Syst Appl Microbiol 2016; 39:527–533 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hatta E, Matsumoto K, Honda Y. Bacillolysin, papain, and subtilisin improve the quality of gluten-free rice bread. J Cereal Sci 2015; 61:41–47 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Collins MD, Pirouz T, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Distribution of menaquinones in actinomycetes and corynebacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1977; 100:221–230 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Collins MD, Jones D. Lipids in the classification and identification of coryneform bacteria containing peptidoglycans based on 2, 4-diaminobutyric acid. J Appl Bacteriol 1980; 48:459–470 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kroppenstedt RM. Separation of bacterial menaquinones by HPLC using Reverse Phase (RP18) and a silver loaded ion exchanger as stationary phases. J Liq Chromatogr 1982; 5:2359–2367 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Minnikin DE, Collins MD, Goodfellow M. Fatty acid and polar lipid composition in the classification of Cellulomonas, Oerskovia and related taxa. J Appl Microbiol 1979; 47:87–95 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Sasser M. Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. In MIDI Technical Note vol 101 Newark, DE: MIDI inc; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Yoon JH, Kim IG, Kang KH, Oh TK, Park YH. Bacillus hwajinpoensis sp. nov. and an unnamed Bacillus genomospecies, novel members of Bacillus rRNA group 6 isolated from sea water of the East Sea and the Yellow Sea in Korea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:803–808 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Chen YG, Zhang YQ, He JW, Klenk HP, Xiao JQ et al. Bacillus hemicentroti sp. nov., a moderate halophile isolated from a sea urchin. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:2950–2955 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006159
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006159
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error