1887

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY logo

Volume 73, Issue 11

sp. nov. isolated from deep-water marine sponge No Access

Abstract

A novel bacterial strain, designated as PHS-Z3, was isolated from a marine sponge belonging to the genus on the Puerto Galera Deep Monkey, Philippines. Cells of PHS-Z3 were Gram-stain-positive, motile, oxidase- and catalase-positive, white-pigmented, spore-forming, short rods that could grow at 10–40 °C (optimum, 20 °C), pH 6.0–9.5 (optimum, pH 7.5) and with 2–16 % (w/v) NaCl (optimum, 7 %). The 16S rRNA gene sequence of PHS-Z3 showed 97.9 %, 96.7 %, and 96.2 % identities to C/2, DT7-4 and RC11, respectively. The results of phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences indicated that PHS-Z3 formed an independent cluster with C/2. The total genome of PHS-Z3 was approximately 7 613 364 bp in size with a DNA G+C content of 51.6 %. The average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) values between PHS-Z3 and other type strains of species of the genus were 68.0–81.4 % [ANI by (ANIb)], 83.0–88.0 % [ANI by MUMmer (ANIm)] and 12.7–32.1 % (dDDH). The dDDH and ANI values were below the standard cut-off criteria for delineation of bacterial species. The percentage of conserved proteins (POCP) values between the genome of PHS-Z3 and those of members of the genus were 39.7–75.7 %, while the average amino acid identity (AAI) values were 55.9–83.7 %. The sole respiratory quinone in the strain was MK-7, and the predominant fatty acids were anteiso-C and C. The major polar lipids of PHS-Z3 consisted of diphosphatidylglycerol, phospholipid and phosphatidylglycerol. The characteristic amino acid in the cell wall of PHS-Z3 was diamino heptanoic acid (-DAP). On the basis of the molecular, physiological, biochemical and chemotaxonomic features, strain PHS-Z3 represents a novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed, with the type strain PHS-Z3 (=MCCC 1K07848=KCTC 43443).

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): Paenibacillus spongiae sp. nov , polyphasic taxonomy and Theonella swinhoei
Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (Award 2022YFC2804101)
    • Principle Award Recipient: ZhiyongLi
© 2023 Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006122
2023-11-01
2024-05-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ash C, Priest FG, Collins MD. Molecular identification of rRNA group 3 bacilli (Ash, Farrow, Wallbanks and Collins) using a PCR probe test. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 1993; 64:253–260 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5607–5612 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Šmerda J, Sedláček I, Páčová Z, Krejčí E, Havel L. Paenibacillus sepulcri sp. nov., isolated from biodeteriorated mural paintings in the Servilia tomb. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology 2006; 56:2341–2344 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang XM, Ma S, Yang SY, Peng R, Zheng Y et al. Paenibacillus nasutitermitis sp. nov., isolated from a termite gut. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:901–905 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Šmerda J, Sedláček I, Páčová Z, Durnová E, Smíšková A et al. Paenibacillus mendelii sp. nov., from surface-sterilized seeds of Pisum sativum L. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:2351–2354 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Grady EN, MacDonald J, Liu L, Richman A, Yuan Z-C. Current knowledge and perspectives of Paenibacillus: a review. Microb Cell Fact 2016; 15:203–221 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Kim D-U, Kim S-G, Lee H, Chun J, Cho J-C et al. Paenibacillus xanthinilyticus sp. nov., isolated from agricultural soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:2937–2942 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Akaracharanya A, Lorliam W, Tanasupawat S, Lee KC, Lee J-S. Paenibacillus cellulositrophicus sp. nov., a cellulolytic bacterium from Thai soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:2680–2684 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Baek SH, Yi TH, Lee ST, Im WT. Paenibacillus pocheonensis sp. nov., a facultative anaerobe isolated from soil of a ginseng field. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:1163–1167 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Baik KS, Lim CH, Choe HN, Kim EM, Seong CN. Paenibacillus rigui sp. nov., isolated from a freshwater wetland. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:529–534 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Ham YJ, Jeong JW, Lee DH, Kim SB. Paenibacillus artemisiicola sp. nov. and Paenibacillus lignilyticus sp. nov., two new endophytic bacterial species isolated from plant roots. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:005270 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Kim T-S, Han J-H, Joung Y, Kim SB. Paenibacillus oenotherae sp. nov. and Paenibacillus hemerocallicola sp. nov., isolated from the roots of herbaceous plants. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:2717–2725 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Lee DS. Paenibacillus cavernae sp. nov., isolated from soil of a natural cave. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:598–603 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Weselowski B, Nathoo N, Eastman AW, MacDonald J, Yuan Z-C. Isolation, identification and characterization of Paenibacillus polymyxa CR1 with potentials for biopesticide, biofertilization, biomass degradation and biofuel production. BMC Microbiol 2016; 16:244–254 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Baindara P, Chaudhry V, Mittal G, Liao LM, Matos CO et al. Characterization of the antimicrobial peptide penisin, a class Ia novel lantibiotic from Paenibacillus sp. strain A3. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2016; 60:580–591 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Seldin L. Paenibacillus, nitrogen fixation and soil fertility. Endospore-forming Soil Bacteria 2011; 27:287–307 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Mathews SL, Grunden AM, Pawlak J. Degradation of lignocellulose and lignin by Paenibacillus glucanolyticus. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 2016; 110:79–86 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Taylor MW, Radax R, Steger D, Wagner M. Sponge-associated microorganisms: evolution, ecology, and biotechnological potential. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2007; 71:295–347 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Paul VJ, Freeman CJ, Agarwal V. Chemical ecology of marine sponges: new opportunities through “-omics.”. Integr Comp Biol 2019; 59:765–776 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Calcabrini C, Catanzaro E, Bishayee A, Turrini E, Fimognari C. Marine sponge natural products with anticancer potential: an updated review. Mar Drugs 2017; 15:310 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Carroll AR, Copp BR, Davis RA, Keyzers RA, Prinsep MR. Marine natural products. Nat Prod Rep 2019; 36:122–173 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Selvin J, Lipton AP. Dendrilla nigra, a marine sponge, as potential source of antibacterial substances for managing shrimp diseases. Aquaculture 2004; 236:277–283 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Ferrari BC, Winsley T, Gillings M, Binnerup S. Cultivating previously uncultured soil bacteria using a soil substrate membrane system. Nat Protoc 2008; 3:1261–1269 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:4876–4882 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap.. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt H-H, Rognes T et al. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:3100–3108 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucl Acids Res 1997; 25:955–964 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Delcher AL, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg SL. Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER. Nucleic Acids Res 1999; 27:4636–4641 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Salzberg SL, Delcher AL, Kasif S, White O. Microbial gene identification using interpolated Markov models. Nucleic Acids Res 1998; 26:544–548 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with glimmer. Bioinformatics 2007; 23:673–679 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182–2192 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Digital DNA–DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:117–134 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA–DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Qin Q-L, Xie B-B, Zhang X-Y, Chen X-L, Zhou B-C et al. A proposed genus boundary for the prokaryotes based on genomic insights. J Bacteriol 2014; 196:2210–2215 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Hua Z-S, Qu Y-N, Zhu Q, Zhou E-M, Qi Y-L et al. Genomic inference of the metabolism and evolution of the archaeal phylum Aigarchaeota. Nat Commun 2018; 9:2832–2843 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Blin K, Shaw S, Kloosterman AM, Charlop-Powers Z, van Wezel GP et al. antiSMASH 6.0: improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:29–35 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhao N, Pan Y, Cheng Z, Liu H. Lasso peptide, a highly stable structure and designable multifunctional backbone. Amino Acids 2016; 48:1347–1356 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60–74 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Chen YL, Sang J, Sun W, Song QQ, Li ZY. Mycetocola spongiae sp. nov., isolated from deep-sea sponge Cacospongia mycofijiensis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:005291 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Tindall BJ, Sikorski J, Smibert RA, Krieg NR et al. Phenotypic characterization and the principles of comparative systematics. In Reddy CA, Beveridge TJ, Breznak JA, Marzluf GA, Schmidt TM. eds Methods for General and Molecular Microbiology Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2007 pp 330–393 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Kovacs N. Identification of Pseudomonas pyocyanea by the oxidase reaction. Nature 1956; 178:703–704 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Humphries R, Bobenchik AM, Hindler JA, Schuetz AN. Overview of changes to the clinical and laboratory standards institute performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, M100, 31st edition. J Clin Microbiol 2021; 59:e0021321 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Komagata K, Suzuki K. Lipid and cell wall analysis in bacterial systematics. Methods Microbiol 1987; 19:161–207
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Collins MD, Jones D. Distribution of isoprenoid quinone structural types in bacteria and their taxonomic implications. Microbiol Rev 1981; 45:316–354 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Meth 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Tindall BJ. Lipid composition of Halobacterium lacusprofundi. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1990; 66:199–202 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Vancanneyti M, Witt S, Abraham WR, Kersters K, Fredrickson HL. Fatty acid content in whole-cell hydrolysates and phospholipid and phospholipid fractions of Pseudomonads: a taxonomic evaluation. Syst Appl Microbiol 1996; 19:528–540 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Sasser M. Technical Note 101: Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids Newark: MIDI, Inc. North; 1990 pp 1–7
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Sakamoto M, Sakurai N, Tanno H, Iino T, Ohkuma M et al. Genome-based, phenotypic and chemotaxonomic classification of Faecalibacterium strains: proposal of three novel species Faecalibacterium duncaniae sp. nov., Faecalibacterium hattorii sp. nov. and Faecalibacterium gallinarum sp. nov.. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:1–11 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006122
Loading
Paenibacillus spongiae sp. nov. isolated from deep-water marine sponge Theonella swinhoei
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 73, 006122 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.006122
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006122
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006122
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error