1887

Abstract

Two Gram-stain-negative, non-motile, non-spore-forming, strictly aerobic and rod-shaped bacterial strains, CMA-7 and CAA-3, were isolated from surface seawater samples collected from the western Pacific Ocean. Phylogeny of 16S rRNA gene sequences indicated they were related to the genera and and shared 95.1, 90.9 and 90.8% sequence similarity with Mok-17, DSM 19592 and ck-I2-15, respectively. Phylogenomic analysis showed that the two strains, together with the members of the genera and , formed a monophyletic clade that could also be considered a monophyletic taxon. This distinctiveness was supported by amino acid identity and percentage of conserved proteins indices, phenotypic and chemotaxonomic characteristics and comparative genomics analysis. Digital DNA‒DNA hybridization values and average nucleotide identities between the two strains and their closest relatives were 18.0–20.8 % and 77.7–79.3 %, respectively. The principal fatty acids were iso-C, iso-C 3-OH, iso-C G, Summed Feature 3 (C 7/C c or C cC1 c), Summed Feature 9 (iso-C c or C 10-methyl), and C 3-OH. The predominant respiratory quinone was MK-6. The polar lipids were phosphatidylethanolamine, aminolipid, aminophospholipid, phospholipid, phosphoglycolipid, glycolipid and unknown polar lipid. The genomic DNA G+C content of strains CMA-7 and CAA-3 was both 38.4 mol%. Genomic analysis indicated they have the potential to degrade cellulose and chitin. Based on the polyphasic evidence presented in this study, the two strains represent a novel species within the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is CMA-7 (=MCCC M28999 = KCTC 92588). Moreover, the transfer of to the genus as nom. nov. (type strain En5 = KCTC 12518 = DSM 19592=CGMCC 1.6973) is also proposed.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • National Science and Technology Fundamental Resources Investigation Program of China (Award 2021FY100900)
    • Principle Award Recipient: QiliangLai
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award 42030412)
    • Principle Award Recipient: ZongzeShao
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award 41976107)
    • Principle Award Recipient: ChunmingDong
  • China Ocean Mineral Resource R&D Association program (Award DY135-B2-01)
    • Principle Award Recipient: ZongzeShao
  • China Ocean Mineral Resource R&D Association program (Award DY-XZ-04)
    • Principle Award Recipient: ZongzeShao
  • National Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China (Award 2021J01508)
    • Principle Award Recipient: ChunmingDong
  • Scientific Research Foundation of Third Institute of Oceanography, MNR (Award 2019021)
    • Principle Award Recipient: ZongzeShao
  • Scientific Research Foundation of Third Institute of Oceanography, MNR (Award 2020009)
    • Principle Award Recipient: ChunmingDong
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006078
2023-10-06
2024-05-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Khan ST, Nakagawa Y, Harayama S. Galbibacter mesophilus gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel member of the family Flavobacteriaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:969–973 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Hameed A, Shahina M, Lin SY, Lai WA, Liu YC et al. Robertkochia marina gen. nov., sp. nov., of the family Flavobacteriaceae, isolated from surface seawater, and emended descriptions of the genera Joostella and Galbibacter. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:533–539 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5607–5612 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Li C, Lai Q, Fu Y, Chen S, Shao Z. Galbibacter marinus sp. nov., isolated from deep-sea sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:1427–1430 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ding J, Wei D, An Z, Zhang C, Jin L et al. Succession of the bacterial community structure and functional prediction in two composting systems viewed through metatranscriptomics. Bioresour Technol 2020; 313:123688 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang B, Wang Y, Wei Y, Chen W, Ding G et al. Impact of inoculation and turning for full-scale composting on core bacterial community and their co-occurrence compared by network analysis. Bioresour Technol 2022; 345:126417 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hao X, Zhang W, Zhao L, Shen L, Zhu L et al. Bacillus subtilis reduces antibiotic resistance genes of animal sludge in vermicomposting by improving heat stress tolerance of Eisenia foetida and bacterial community adjustment. Environ Res 2023; 219:115088 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ding S, Zhou D, Wei H, Wu S, Xie B. Alleviating soil degradation caused by watermelon continuous cropping obstacle: Application of urban waste compost. Chemosphere 2021; 262:128387 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Islam M, Kim S-H, Ramos SC, Mamuad LL, Son A-R et al. Holstein and jersey steers differ in rumen microbiota and enteric methane emissions even fed the same total mixed ration. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:601061 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ramos SC, Jeong CD, Mamuad LL, Kim SH, Kang SH et al. Diet transition from high-forage to high-concentrate alters rumen bacterial community composition, epithelial transcriptomes and ruminal fermentation parameters in dairy cows. Animals 2021; 11:838 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cai C, Zhao M, Yao F, Zhu R, Cai H et al. Deoxynivalenol degradation by various microbial communities and its impacts on different bacterial flora. Toxins 2022; 14:537 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. De Deckker P. The indo-pacific warm pool: critical to world oceanography and world climate. Geosci Lett 2016; 3:20 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Radenac M-H, Messié M, Léger F, Bosc C. A very oligotrophic zone observed from space in the equatorial Pacific warm pool. Remote Sens Environ 2013; 134:224–233 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bernardet J-F, Nakagawa Y, Holmes B. Subcommittee On The Taxonomy Of F, Prokaryotes C-LBOTICOSO Proposed minimal standards for describing new taxa of the family Flavobacteriaceae and emended description of the family. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:1049–1070 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lane DJ, Pace B, Olsen GJ, Stahl DA, Sogin ML et al. Rapid determination of 16S ribosomal RNA sequences for phylogenetic analyses. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1985; 82:6955–6959 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:W293–W296 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Prjibelski A, Antipov D, Meleshko D, Lapidus A, Korobeynikov A. Using SPAdes de novo assembler. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 2020; 70:e102 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 2018; 9:5114 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Wayne LG. International committee on systematic bacteriology: announcement of the report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg 1988; 268:433–434 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics 2019; 36:1925–1927 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Rosselló-Mora R, Amann R. The species concept for prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2001; 25:39–67 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Prokaryotic taxonomy and phylogeny in the genomic era: advancements and challenges ahead. Curr Opin Microbiol 2007; 10:504–509 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Luo C, Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. MyTaxa: an advanced taxonomic classifier for genomic and metagenomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:e73 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Sangal V, Goodfellow M, Jones AL, Sutcliffe IC. A stable home for an equine pathogen: valid publication of the binomial Prescottella equi gen. nov., comb. nov., and reclassification of four rhodococcal species into the genus Prescottella. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T et al. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 2008; 9:75 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhou Z, Tran PQ, Breister AM, Liu Y, Kieft K et al. METABOLIC: high-throughput profiling of microbial genomes for functional traits, metabolism, biogeochemistry, and community-scale functional networks. Microbiome 2022; 10:33 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Y, Thomas HR, Frank MH et al. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol Plant 2020; 13:1194–1202 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Guerrero-Cruz S, Vaksmaa A, Horn MA, Niemann H, Pijuan M et al. Methanotrophs: discoveries, environmental relevance, and a perspective on current and future applications. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:678057 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Dong X, Cai M. Determinative Manual for Routine Bacteriology Beijing: Scientific Press; 2001
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Sasser M. Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. In MIDI Technical Note vol 101 North Newark, Del, USA: MIDI Inc; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Collins MD. Isoprenoid quinone analyses in bacterial classification and identification. In Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. eds Chemical Methods in Bacterial Systematics London: Academic Press; 1985 pp 267–287
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kates M. Techniques of Lipidology:Isolation, Analysis, and Identification of Lipids. 2nd rev Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1986
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Quan Z-X, Xiao Y-P, Roh SW, Nam Y-D, Chang H-W et al. Joostella marina gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel member of the family Flavobacteriaceae isolated from the East Sea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:1388–1392 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Kim B-C, Lee KH, Kim MN, Jung MY, Chang Y-H et al. Joostella atrarenae sp. nov., a novel member of the Flavobacteriaceae originating from the black sea sand of Jeju Island. Curr Microbiol 2011; 62:606–611 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006078
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006078
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error