1887

Abstract

Strain 16-5, a mesophilic methanotroph of the genus , was isolated from rice field soil sampled in Chungcheong Province, Republic of Korea. Strain 16-5 had both particulate and soluble methane monooxygenases and could only grow on methane and methanol as electron donors. Strain 16-5 cells are Gram-negative, white to light tan in color, non-motile, non-flagellated, diplococcoid to cocci, and have the typical type I intracytoplasmic membrane system. Strain 16-5 grew at 18–38 °C (optimum, 27 °C) and at pH 5.0–8.0 (optimum, pH 6.5–7.0). C ω7 (38.8%), C 5 (18.8%), C 6 (16.8%) and C (16.9%) were the major fatty acids, and phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol, diphosphatidylglycerol and an unidentified phospholipid were the major polar lipids. The main respiratory quinone was methylene-ubiquinone-8. Strain 16-5 displayed the highest 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities to other taxonomically recognized members of the genus , i.e. Texas (98.62%) and IM1 (98.49 %), which were its closest relatives. It did, however, differ from all other taxonomically described species due to some phenotypic differences, most notably its inability to grow at temperatures above 38 °C, where other species thrive. Its 4.34 Mbp-sized genome has a DNA G+C content of 62.47 mol%, and multiple genome-based properties such as average nucleotide identity and digital DNA-DNA hybridization value distanced it from its closest relatives. Based on the data presented above, this strain represents the first non-thermotolerant species of the genus . The name sp. nov. is proposed, and 16-5 (=JCM 35359=KCTC 82050) is the type strain.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • NRF KOREA (Award NIBR202325101)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Sung-KeunRhee
  • NRF KOREA (Award PJ01700703)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Sung-KeunRhee
  • NRF KOREA (Award 2021R1A2C3004015)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Sung-KeunRhee
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006077
2023-10-12
2024-05-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bowman JP. Methylococcus. In W.B. Whitman FR, Kämpfer P, Trujillo M, Chun J, DeVos P et al. eds Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2015 pp 1–10 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Oshkin IY, Suleimanov RZ, Khmelenina VN, Mardanov AV, Pimenov NV et al. Complete genome sequence of Methylococcus capsulatus MIR, a methanotroph capable of growth on methanol. Microbiol Resour Announc 2022; 11:e0054222 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Oshkin IY, Beck DAC, Lamb AE, Tchesnokova V, Benuska G et al. Methane-fed microbial microcosms show differential community dynamics and pinpoint taxa involved in communal response. ISME J 2015; 9:1119–1129 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Foster JW, Davis RH. A methane-dependent coccus, with notes on classification and nomenclature of obligate, methane-utilizing bacteria. J Bacteriol 1966; 91:1924–1931 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Whittenbury R, Phillips KC, Wilkinson JF. Enrichment, isolation and some properties of methane-utilizing bacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1970; 61:205–218 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Oshkin IY, Danilova OV, But SY, Miroshnikov KK, Suleimanov RZ et al. Expanding characterized diversity and the pool of complete genome sequences of Methylococcus species, the bacteria of high environmental and biotechnological relevance. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:756830 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Awala SI, Bellosillo LA, Gwak J-H, Nguyen N-L, Kim S-J et al. Methylococcus geothermalis sp. nov., a methanotroph isolated from a geothermal field in the Republic of Korea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5520–5530 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Islam T, Hossain M, Tabassum N, Haque MA, Reza HM et al. Two novel thermotolerant methane oxidizers from a tropical natural gas field in Bangladesh. Bangla J Microbiol 2022; 38:63–71 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Chaumeil P-A, Rinke C, Mussig AJ et al. A complete domain-to-species taxonomy for Bacteria and Archaea. Nat Biotechnol 2020; 38:1079–1086 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Rinke C, Mussig AJ, Chaumeil P-A et al. GTDB: an ongoing census of bacterial and archaeal diversity through a phylogenetically consistent, rank normalized and complete genome-based taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D785–D794 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bowman JP, Sly LI, Nichols PD, Hayward AC. Revised taxonomy of the methanotrophs: description of Methylobacter gen. nov., emendation of Methylococcus, validation of Methylosinus and Methylocystis species, and a proposal that the family Methylococcaceae includes only the group I methanotrophs. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1993; 43:735–753 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Malashenko IP, Romanovskaia VA, Bogachenko VN, Shved AD. Thermophilic and thermotolerant bacteria that assimilate methane. Mikrobiologiia 1975; 44:855–862
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Frindte K, Maarastawi SA, Lipski A, Hamacher J, Knief C. Characterization of the first rice paddy cluster I isolate, Methyloterricola oryzae gen. nov., sp nov. and amended description of Methylomagnum ishizawai. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hoefman S, van der Ha D, Iguchi H, Yurimoto H, Sakai Y et al. Methyloparacoccus murrellii gen. nov., sp. nov., a methanotroph isolated from pond water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:2100–2107 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Geymonat E, Ferrando L, Tarlera SE. Methylogaea oryzae gen. nov., sp. nov., a mesophilic methanotroph isolated from a rice paddy field. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:2568–2572 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Khalifa A, Lee CG, Ogiso T, Ueno C, Dianou D et al. Methylomagnum ishizawai gen. nov., sp. nov., a mesophilic type I methanotroph isolated from rice rhizosphere. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:3527–3534 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Rahalkar MC, Khatri K, Mohite J, Pandit PS, Bahulikar RA. A novel type I methanotroph Methylolobus aquaticus gen. nov. sp. nov. isolated from a tropical wetland. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2020; 113:959–971 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Rattanachomsri U, Kanokratana P, Eurwilaichitr L, Igarashi Y, Champreda V. Culture-independent phylogenetic analysis of the microbial community in industrial sugarcane bagasse feedstock piles. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2011; 75:232–239 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gagliano AL, D’Alessandro W, Tagliavia M, Parello F, Quatrini P. Methanotrophic activity and diversity of methanotrophs in volcanic geothermal soils at Pantelleria (Italy). Biogeosciences 2014; 11:5865–5875 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Houghton KM, Stewart LC. Temperature-gradient incubation isolates multiple competitive species from a single environmental sample. Access Microbiol 2020; 2:acmi000081 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kizilova AK, Sukhacheva MV, Pimenov NV, Yurkov AM, Kravchenko IK. Methane oxidation activity and diversity of aerobic methanotrophs in pH-neutral and semi-neutral thermal springs of the Kunashir Island, Russian far East. Extremophiles 2014; 18:207–218 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lin L-H, Hall J, Onstott TC, Gihring T, Lollar BS et al. Planktonic microbial communities associated with fracture-derived groundwater in a deep gold mine of South Africa. Geomicrobiol J 2006; 23:475–497 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Borgonie G, Linage-Alvarez B, Ojo AO, Mundle SOC, Freese LB et al. Eukaryotic opportunists dominate the deep-subsurface biosphere in South Africa. Nat Commun 2015; 6:8952 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hardoim PR, Hardoim CCP, van Overbeek LS, van Elsas JD. Dynamics of seed-borne rice endophytes on early plant growth stages. PLoS One 2012; 7:e30438 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kato S, Kikuchi S, Kashiwabara T, Takahashi Y, Suzuki K et al. Prokaryotic abundance and community composition in a freshwater iron-rich microbial mat at circumneutral pH. Geomicrobiol J 2012; 29:896–905 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Smartt AD, Brye KR, Rogers CW, Norman RJ, Gbur EE et al. Previous crop and cultivar effects on methane emissions from drill-seeded, delayed-flood rice grown on a clay soil. Appl Environ Soil Sci 2016; 2016:1–13 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Conrad R. The global methane cycle: recent advances in understanding the microbial processes involved. Environ Microbiol Rep 2009; 1:285–292 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Rahalkar MC, Khatri K, Pandit PS, Dhakephalkar PK. A putative novel methylobacter member (KRF1) from the globally important methylobacter clade 2: cultivation and salient draft genome features. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2019; 112:1399–1408 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Rahalkar MC, Khatri K, Pandit P, Bahulikar RA, Mohite JA. Cultivation of important methanotrophs from Indian Rice Fields. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:669244 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Pandit PS, Hoppert M, Rahalkar MC. Description of “Candidatus Methylocucumis oryzae”, a novel Type I methanotroph with large cells and pale pink colour, isolated from an Indian rice field. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2018; 111:2473–2484 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Pandit PS, Rahalkar MC. Renaming of “Candidatus Methylocucumis oryzae” as Methylocucumis oryzae gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel type I methanotroph isolated from India. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2019; 112:955–959 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Costello AM, Lidstrom ME. Molecular characterization of functional and phylogenetic genes from natural populations of methanotrophs in lake sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 1999; 65:5066–5074 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Hutchens E, Radajewski S, Dumont MG, McDonald IR, Murrell JC. Analysis of methanotrophic bacteria in movile cave by stable isotope probing. Environ Microbiol 2004; 6:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 1991; 173:697–703 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Nguyen N-L, Yu W-J, Yang H-Y, Kim J-G, Jung M-Y et al. A novel methanotroph in the genus Methylomonas that contains a distinct clade of soluble methane monooxygenase. J Microbiol 2017; 55:775–782 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Hucker GJ. A new modification and application of the Gram stain. J Bacteriol 1921; 6:395–397 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Nowak E, Brousseau R, Garrett J, Masson L, Maynard C et al. Characterization of formulated microbial products by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, total cellular fatty acid analysis, and DNA microarray analysis. Can J Microbiol 2008; 54:380–390 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Hu HY, Fujie K, Urano K. Development of a novel solid phase extraction method for the analysis of bacterial quinones in activated sludge with a higher reliability. J Biosci Bioeng 1999; 87:378–382 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Hurt RA, Qiu X, Wu L, Roh Y, Palumbo AV et al. Simultaneous recovery of RNA and DNA from soils and sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001; 67:4495–4503 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Chin C-S, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J et al. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Methods 2013; 10:563–569 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 2014; 9:e112963 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP et al. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:6614–6624 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Roosaare M, Puustusmaa M, Möls M, Vaher M, Remm M. PlasmidSeeker: identification of known plasmids from bacterial whole genome sequencing reads. PeerJ 2018; 6:e4588 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:772–780 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic acids symposium series. London: Information Retrieval Ltd; 1999 pp c1979–c2000
  47. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D801–D807 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Medvedkova KA, Khmelenina VN, Suzina NE, Trotsenko YA. Antioxidant systems of moderately thermophilic methanotrophs Methylocaldum szegediense and Methylococcus capsulatus. Microbiology 2009; 78:670–677 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Davies SL, Whittenbury R. Fine structure of methane and other hydrocarbon-utilizing bacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1970; 61:227–232 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Tveit AT, Hestnes AG, Robinson SL, Schintlmeister A, Dedysh SN et al. Widespread soil bacterium that oxidizes atmospheric methane. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2019; 116:8515–8524 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Dedysh SN, Khmelenina VN, Suzina NE, Trotsenko YA, Semrau JD et al. Methylocapsa acidiphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel methane-oxidizing and dinitrogen-fixing acidophilic bacterium from Sphagnum bog. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:251–261 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Dunfield PF, Belova SE, Vorob’ev AV, Cornish SL, Dedysh SN. Methylocapsa aurea sp. nov., a facultative methanotroph possessing a particulate methane monooxygenase, and emended description of the genus Methylocapsa. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:2659–2664 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Joergensen L, Degn H. Growth rate and methane affinity of a turbidostatic and oxystatic continuous culture of Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath). Biotechnol Lett 1987; 9:71–76 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Collins MD, Green PN. Isolation and characterization of a novel coenzyme Q from some methane-oxidizing bacteria. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1985; 133:1125–1131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Makula RA. Phospholipid composition of methane-utilizing bacteria. J Bacteriol 1978; 134:771–777 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Ward N, Larsen Ø, Sakwa J, Bruseth L, Khouri H et al. Genomic insights into methanotrophy: the complete genome sequence of Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath). PLoS Biol 2004; 2:e303 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Kleiveland CR, Hult LTO, Kuczkowska K, Jacobsen M, Lea T et al. Draft genome sequence of the methane-oxidizing bacterium Methylococcus capsulatus (Texas). J Bacteriol 2012; 194:6626 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Kaluzhnaya M, Khmelenina V, Eshinimaev B, Suzina N, Nikitin D et al. Taxonomic characterization of new alkaliphilic and alkalitolerant methanotrophs from soda lakes of the Southeastern Transbaikal region and description of Methylomicrobium buryatense sp.nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 2001; 24:166–176 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Takeuchi M, Kamagata Y, Oshima K, Hanada S, Tamaki H et al. Methylocaldum marinum sp. nov., a thermotolerant, methane-oxidizing bacterium isolated from marine sediments, and emended description of the genus Methylocaldum. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:3240–3246 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Takeuchi M, Ozaki H, Hiraoka S, Kamagata Y, Sakata S et al. Possible cross-feeding pathway of facultative methylotroph Methyloceanibacter caenitepidi Gela4 on methanotroph Methylocaldum marinum S8. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0213535 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Ghashghavi M, Belova SE, Bodelier PLE, Dedysh SN, Kox MAR et al. Methylotetracoccus oryzae strain C50C1 is a novel type Ib gammaproteobacterial methanotroph adapted to freshwater environments. mSphere 2019; 4:e00631–00618 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006077
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006077
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error