1887

Abstract

Two aerobic, Gram-stain-positive, spore-forming motile bacterial strains, designated SSPM10-3 and SSWR10-1, were isolated from salterns in Jeollanam province of South Korea. Both strains were halotolerant and grew well in 5 % NaCl but not in 20 and 25% NaCl, respectively. Optimal growth was observed with 5 % NaCl, at 30 °C and at pH 7.0–8.0. On the basis of the results of phylogenetic analysis using 16S rRNA gene sequence, both the strains were placed within the genus with (98.65 % similarity) as their nearest neighbour. Menaquinone-7 (MK-7) (97 %) was the major isoprenoid quinone in both strains and major cellular fatty acids were anteiso-C, iso-C and anteiso-C. Orthologous average nucleotide identity with usearch (OrthoANIu) and digital DNA–DNA hybridisation (dDDH) percentage comparison indicated that SSPM10-3 and SSWR10-1 exhibited highest similarity with Awa-1 at 74.27 % and 21.0 and 74.23 % and 20.0 %, respectively. The DNA G+C contents of the strains were 39.1 % (SSPM10-3) and 38.5 % (SSWR10-1). Members of the genus , both strains were distinct from each other with respect to their ability to produce urease, β-glucosidase, assimilation of inulin and methyl-α--glucopyranoside and degradation of casein. Compared with each other, ANI and d4 dDDH calculations were only 88.2 % and 36.3 %, well below the cut-off values for species delineation for each index. On the basis of their phenotypic, physiological, biochemical and phylogenetic characteristics,SSPM10-3 and SSWR10-1 represent distinct novel species for which names SSPM10-3 and SSWR10-1 are proposed. The type strains are SSPM10-3 (=KACC 21933 =NBRC 115502) and SSWR10-1 (=KACC 21934 =NBRC 115503).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005965
2023-10-03
2024-05-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Wainø M, Tindall BJ, Schumann P, Ingvorsen K. Gracilibacillus gen. nov., with description of Gracilibacillus halotolerans gen. nov., sp. nov.; transfer of Bacillus dipsosauri to Gracilibacillus dipsosauri comb. nov., and Bacillus salexigens to the genus Salibacillus gen. nov., as Salibacillus salexigens comb. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1999; 49 Pt 2:821–831 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5607–5612 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahmed I, Yokota A, Fujiwara T. Gracilibacillus boraciitolerans sp. nov., a highly boron-tolerant and moderately halotolerant bacterium isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:796–802 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Carrasco IJ, Márquez MC, Yanfen X, Ma Y, Cowan DA et al. Gracilibacillus orientalis sp. nov., a novel moderately halophilic bacterium isolated from a salt lake in Inner Mongolia, China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:599–604 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen Y-G, Cui X-L, Zhang Y-Q, Li W-J, Wang Y-X et al. Gracilibacillus halophilus sp. nov., a moderately halophilic bacterium isolated from saline soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:2403–2408 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gan L, Li X, Chen J, Zhang S, Zhang R et al. Gracilibacillus salitolerans sp. nov., a moderate halophile isolated from saline soil in Northwest China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:3701–3710 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gao M, Liu Z-Z, Zhou Y-G, Liu H-C, Ma Y-C et al. Gracilibacillus kekensis sp. nov., a moderate halophile isolated from Keke Salt Lake. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:1032–1036 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Huo Y-Y, Xu X-W, Cui H-L, Wu M. Gracilibacillus ureilyticus sp. nov., a halotolerant bacterium from a saline–alkaline soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:1383–1386 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Jeon CO, Lim J-M, Jang HH, Park D-J, Xu L-H et al. Gracilibacillus lacisalsi sp. nov., a halophilic Gram-positive bacterium from a salt lake in China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:2282–2286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kim P, Lee J-C, Park D-J, Shin K-S, Kim J-Y et al. Gracilibacillus bigeumensis sp. nov., a moderately halophilic bacterium from solar saltern soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:1857–1863 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Tang S-K, Wang Y, Lou K, Mao P-H, Jin X et al. Gracilibacillus saliphilus sp. nov., a moderately halophilic bacterium isolated from a salt lake. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:1620–1624 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Diop A, Khelaifia S, Armstrong N, Labas N, Fournier P-E et al. Microbial culturomics unravels the halophilic microbiota repertoire of table salt: description of Gracilibacillus massiliensis sp. nov. Microb Ecol Health Dis 2016; 27:32049 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Chamroensaksri N, Tanasupawat S, Akaracharanya A, Visessanguan W, Kudo T et al. Gracilibacillus thailandensis sp. nov., from fermented fish (pla-ra). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:944–948 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hirota K, Hanaoka Y, Nodasaka Y, Yumoto I. Gracilibacillus alcaliphilus sp. nov., a facultative alkaliphile isolated from indigo fermentation liquor for dyeing. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:3174–3180 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Huang X-X, Xu L, Sun J-Q. Gracilibacillus suaedae sp. nov., an indole acetic acid-producing endophyte isolated from a root of Suaeda salsa. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:12 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. He S-W, Wang X, Guo H-B, Han J-G, Thin KK et al. Gracilibacillus oryzae sp. nov., isolated from rice seeds. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5467–5472 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Oh YJ, Lee H-W, Lim SK, Kwon M-S, Lee J et al. Gracilibacillus kimchii sp. nov., a halophilic bacterium isolated from kimchi. J Microbiol 2016; 54:588–593 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Oren A. Industrial and environmental applications of halophilic microorganisms. Environ Technol 2010; 31:825–834 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Torres M, Dessaux Y, Llamas I. Saline environments as a source of potential quorum sensing disruptors to control bacterial infections: a review. Mar Drugs 2019; 17:191 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Yin J, Chen J-C, Wu Q, Chen G-Q. Halophiles, coming stars for industrial biotechnology. Biotechnol Adv 2015; 33:1433–1442 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kim S-K. Marine microorganism resources and biotechnology. In Essentials of Marine Biotechnology Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019 pp 381–415 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Amoozegar MA, Safarpour A, Noghabi KA, Bakhtiary T, Ventosa A. Halophiles and their vast potential in biofuel production. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:1895 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lane D. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. eds Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics 1991 pp 115–175
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol 2021; 38:3022–3027 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Biol 1971; 20:406–416 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approch using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sasser M. Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. USFCC Newsl 1990; 20:1–6
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Hamada M, Yamamura H, Komukai C, Tamura T, Suzuki K et al. Luteimicrobium album sp. nov., a novel actinobacterium isolated from a lichen collected in Japan, and emended description of the genus Luteimicrobium. J Antibiot 2012; 65:427–431 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T et al. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 2008; 9:1–15 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ et al. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:D206–14 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Brettin T, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S et al. RASTtk: a modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci Rep 2015; 5:8365 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D801–D807 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Ito M, Morino M, Krulwich TA. Mrp antiporters have important roles in diverse bacteria and archaea. Front Microbiol 2017; 8:2325 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Herz K, Vimont S, Padan E, Berche P. Roles of NhaA, NhaB, and NhaD Na+/H+ antiporters in survival of Vibrio cholerae in a saline environment. J Bacteriol 2003; 185:1236–1244 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005965
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005965
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error