1887

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY logo

Volume 73, Issue 6

sp. nov., isolated from intestine of seahorse No Access

Abstract

A novel Gram-stain-negative, catalase- and oxidase-positive, facultatively anaerobic, and rod-shaped motile bacterial strain, designated as YLB-11, was isolated from seahorse intestine. The 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis showed that YLB-11 was most closely related LMG 19157 (98.9 % nucleotide sequence identity). Phylogenetic analysis placed strain YLB-11 within the genus . The major cellular fatty acids were summed feature 3 (C 6/C 7, 36.4 %), C (19.1 %) and summed feature 8 (C 6/C 7, 12.3 %). The DNA G+C content of YLB-11 was 44.7 mol %. The DNA–DNA hybridization and average nucleotide identity values for whole-genome sequence comparisons between YLB-11 and related species were clearly below the thresholds used for the delineation of a novel species. Therefore, YLB-11 is considered to represent novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is YLB-11 (=MCCC 1A17441=KCTC 72604).

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): polyphasic taxonomy , seahorse intestine and Vibrio intestinalis sp. nov.
Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • National Science and Technology Fundamental Resources Investigation Program of China (Award 2021FY100900)
    • Principle Award Recipient: ZongzeShao
  • National Infrastructure for Microbiological Resources (Award NMRC-2022-9)
    • Principle Award Recipient: ZongzeShao
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award 42272359)
    • Principle Award Recipient: ShipingWei
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award 42206101)
    • Principle Award Recipient: LiboYu
  • Scientific Research Foundation of Third Institute of Oceanography, MNR (Award 2023003)
    • Principle Award Recipient: LiboYu
© 2023 The Authors
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005932
2023-06-15
2024-05-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Farmer JJ, Michael JJ. Genus I Vibrio Pacini 1854, 411AL. In Garrity GM. eds Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. The Proteobacteria, Part B, 2nd edn. New York: Springer; 2005 pp 494–546
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Parte AC. LPSN - List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (bacterio.net), 20 years on. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:1825–1829 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Kumari P, Poddar A, Schumann P, Das SK. Vibrio panuliri sp. nov., a marine bacterium isolated from spiny lobster, Panulirus penicillatus and transfer of Vibrio ponticus from Scophthalmi clade to the newly proposed Ponticus clade. Res Microbiol 2014; 165:826–835 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Kirchberger PC, Turnsek M, Hunt DE, Haley BJ, Colwell RR et al. Vibrio metoecus sp. nov., a close relative of Vibrio cholerae isolated from coastal brackish ponds and clinical specimens. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:3208–3214 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Gomez-Gil B, Tron-Mayén L, Roque A, Turnbull JF, Inglis V et al. Species of Vibrio isolated from hepatopancreas, haemolymph and digestive tract of a population of healthy juvenile Penaeus vannamei. Aquaculture 1998; 163:1–9 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Poli A, Romano I, Mastascusa V, Buono L, Orlando P et al. Vibrio coralliirubri sp. nov., a new species isolated from mucus of red coral (Corallium rubrum) collected at Procida island, Italy. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2018; 111:1105–1115 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Huq A, Small EB, West PA, Huq MI, Rahman R et al. Ecological relationships between Vibrio cholerae and planktonic crustacean copepods. Appl Environ Microbiol 1983; 45:275–283 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Pascual J, Macián MC, Arahal DR, Garay E, Pujalte MJ. Multilocus sequence analysis of the central clade of the genus Vibrio by using the 16S rRNA, recA, pyrH, rpoD, gyrB, rctB and toxR genes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:154–165 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Wu J, Qu W, Lai Q, Pei S, Zhang T et al. Vibrio ziniensis sp. nov., isolated from mangrove sediments. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71: [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Muhammad N, Nguyen TTH, Lee Y-J, Ko J, Avila F et al. Vibrio ostreae sp. nov., a novel gut bacterium isolated from a yellow sea oyster. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:10 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Sawabe T, Ogura Y, Matsumura Y, Feng G, Amin AR et al. Updating the Vibrio clades defined by multilocus sequence phylogeny: proposal of eight new clades, and the description of Vibrio tritonius sp. nov. Front Microbiol 2013; 4:414 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Sawabe T, Kita-Tsukamoto K, Thompson FL. Inferring the evolutionary history of Vibrios by means of multilocus sequence analysis. J Bacteriol 2007; 189:7932–7936 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. DeLong EF. Archaea in coastal marine environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1992; 89:5685–5689 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Kim O-S, Cho Y-J, Lee K, Yoon S-H, Kim M et al. Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:716–721 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Rzhetsky A, Nei M. Statistical properties of the ordinary least-squares, generalized least-squares, and minimum-evolution methods of phylogenetic inference. J Mol Evol 1992; 35:367–375 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Standard operating procedure for calculating genome-to-genome distances based on high-scoring segment pairs. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:142–148 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:117–134 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Na S-I, Kim YO, Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Baek I et al. UBCG: up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Microbiol 2018; 56:280–285 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Tanaka M, Hongyu B, Jiang C, Mino S, Milet Meirelles P et al. Vibrio taketomensis sp. nov. by genome taxonomy. Syst Appl Microbiol 2020; 43:126048 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Jiang C, Tanaka M, Nishikawa S, Mino S, Romalde JL et al. Vibrio clade 3.0: new vibrionaceae evolutionary units using genome-based approach. Curr Microbiol 2021; 79:10 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Moore WEC, Stackebrandt E, Kandler O, Colwell RR, Krichevsky MI et al. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1987; 37:463–464 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Morishima K. BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG tools for functional characterization of genome and metagenome sequences. J Mol Biol 2016; 428:726–731 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Yu L, Lai Q, Yi Z, Zhang L, Huang Y et al. Microbacterium sediminis sp. nov., a psychrotolerant, thermotolerant, halotolerant and alkalitolerant actinomycete isolated from deep-sea sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:25–30 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Blazevic DJ, Ederer GM. Principles of Biochemical Tests in Diagnostic Microbiology New York: John Wiley, Sons; 1975
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Furniss A, Lee J, Donovan T. The Vibrios HMSO; 1978
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Sasser M. Identification of bacteria through fatty acid analysis. In Klement Z, Rudolph K, Sands DC. eds Methods in Phytobacteriology Budapest: Akademiai Kiado; 1990 pp 199–201
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Chimetto LA, Cleenwerck I, Moreira APB, Brocchi M, Willems A et al. Vibrio variabilis sp. nov. and Vibrio maritimus sp. nov., isolated from Palythoa caribaeorum. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:3009–3015 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Yoshizawa S, Wada M, Yokota A, Kogure K. Vibrio sagamiensis sp. nov., luminous marine bacteria isolated from sea water. J Gen Appl Microbiol 2010; 56:499–507 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Pujalte MJ, Ortigosa M, Urdaci MC, Garay E, Grimont PAD. Vibrio mytili sp. nov., from mussels. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1993; 43:358–362 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Thompson FL, Li Y, Gomez-Gil B, Thompson CC, Hoste B et al. Vibrio neptunius sp. nov., Vibrio brasiliensis sp. nov. and Vibrio xuii sp. nov., isolated from the marine aquaculture environment (bivalves, fish, rotifers and shrimps). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003; 53:245–252 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Macián M, Garay E, Grimont P, Pujalte M. Vibrio ponticus sp. nov., a neighbour of V. fluvialis-V. furnissii clade, isolated from gilthead sea bream, mussels and seawater. Syst Appl Microbiol 2004; 27:535–540 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005932
Loading
Vibrio intestinalis sp. nov., isolated from intestine of seahorse
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 73, 005932 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.005932
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005932
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005932
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error