1887

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY logo

Volume 73, Issue 6

sp. nov. and sp. nov., two new strains associated with potato scab in Brazil No Access

Abstract

Two new actinobacteria, designated strains IBSBF 2807 and IBSBF 2953, isolated from scab lesions on potato tubers grown in the southern Brazilian states of Rio Grande do Sul and Santa Catarina, respectively, were characterized and identified through a polyphasic approach. Phylogenetic analyses of 16S rRNA sequences revealed that these two strains belong to the genus . Multilocus sequence analysis using five concatenated genes, , , , and , allocated strains IBSBF 2807 and IBSBF 2953 in distinct branches of phytopathogenic strains. PCR-RFLP analysis of the gene also confirmed that these strains differ from the type strains of associated with potato scab. The morphological, physiological and biochemical characterization, along with the overall genome-related index properties, indicated that these two strains could be distinguished from their closest phylogenetic relatives and each other. According to the data, IBSBF 2807 and IBSBF 2953 represent two new species related to potato scab. The proposed names for these strains are sp. nov. (IBSBF 2807=CBMAI 2674=ICMP 24297=MUM 22.66) and sp. nov (IBSBF 2953=CBMAI 2675=ICMP 24301=MUM 22.68).

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): phytopathology , polyphasic taxonomy. , potato scab and Streptomyces sp. nov.
Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (Award 2019/12999-9)
    • Principle Award Recipient: LucasVitor
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (Award 2017/50334-3)
    • Principle Award Recipient: SuzeteAparecida Lanza Destéfano
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (Award 133330/2019-2)
    • Principle Award Recipient: LucasVitor
© 2023 The Authors
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005916
2023-06-15
2024-05-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Waksman SA, Henrici AT. The nomenclature and classification of the actinomycetes. J Bacteriol 1943; 46:337–341 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Loria R, Kers J, Joshi M. Evolution of plant pathogenicity in Streptomyces. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2006; 44:469–487 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Seipke RF, Kaltenpoth M, Hutchings MI. Streptomyces as symbionts: an emerging and widespread theme?. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2012; 36:862–876 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bignell DRD, Fyans JK, Cheng Z. Phytotoxins produced by plant pathogenic Streptomyces species. J Appl Microbiol 2014; 116:223–235 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Dees MW, Wanner LA. In search of better management of potato common scab. Potato Res 2012; 55:249–268 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Jansky S, Douches D, Haynes K. Germplasm release: three tetraploid potato clones with resistance to common scab. Am J Potato Res 2018; 95:178–182 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Corrêa DBA, Salomão D, Rodrigues-Neto J, Harakava R, Destéfano SAL. Application of PCR-RFLP technique to species identification and phylogenetic analysis of Streptomyces associated with potato scab in Brazil based on partial atpD gene sequences. Eur J Plant Pathol 2015; 142:1–12 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Corrêa DBA, do Amaral DT, da Silva MJ, Destéfano SAL. Streptomyces brasiliscabiei, a new species causing potato scab in south Brazil. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2021; 114:913–931 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Loria R, Davis JR. III Gram-positive bacteria, B.Streptomyces scabies. In Schaad NW. eds Laboratory Guide for Identification of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria St Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society; 1988 pp 114–119
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Shirling EB, Gottlieb D. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1966; 16:313–340 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Kitajima EW, Leite B. Curso Introdutório de Microscopia Eletrônica de Varredura Brazil: NAP/MEPA ESALQ; 1999
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Pridham TG, Gottlieb D. The utilization of carbon compounds by some actinomycetales as an aid for species determination. J Bacteriol 1948; 56:107–114 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Xu P, Li WJ, Tang SK, Zhang YQ, Chen GZ et al. Naxibacter alkalitolerans gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel member of the family “Oxalobacteraceae” isolated from China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:1149–1153 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Flores-Gonzalez R, Velasco I, Montes F. Detection and characterization of Streptomyces causing potato common scab in Western Europe. Plant Pathol 2008; 57:162–169
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Loria R, Bukhalid RA, Creath RA, Leiner RH, Olivier M et al. Differential production of thaxtomins by pathogenic Streptomyces species in vitro. Phytopathology 1996; 85:537 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Kers JA, Cameron KD, Joshi MV, Bukhalid RA, Morello JE et al. A large, mobile pathogenicity island confers plant pathogenicity on Streptomyces species. Mol Microbiol 2005; 55:1025–1033 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Wanner LA. A survey of genetic variation in Streptomyces isolates causing potato common scab in the United States. Phytopathology 2006; 96:1363–1371 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Bukhalid RA, Chung SY, Loria R. nec1, a gene conferring a necrogenic phenotype, is conserved in plant-pathogenic Streptomyces spp. and linked to a transposase pseudogene. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 1998; 11:960–967 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. eds Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematic New York: Wiley; 1991 pp 115–175
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighborjoining method-a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Guo Y, Zheng W, Rong X, Huang YA. A multilocus phylogeny of the Streptomyces griseus 16S rRNA gene clade: use of multilocus sequence analysis for streptomycete systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:149–159 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhbannikov IY, Hunter SS, Foster JA, Settles ML. SeqyClean: a pipeline for high throughput sequence data preprocessing. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health InformaticsAugust20 2017 pp 407–416
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Boetzer M, Henkel CV, Jansen HJ, Butler D, Pirovano W. Scaffolding pre-assembled contigs using SSPACE. Bioinformatics 2011; 27:578–579 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Tanizawa Y, Fujisawa T, Nakamura Y. DFAST: a flexible prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline for faster genome publication. Bioinformatics 2018; 34:1037–1039 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:1–14 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Rong X, Huang Y. Taxonomic evaluation of the Streptomyces hygroscopicus clade using multilocus sequence analysis and DNA-DNA hybridization, validating the MLSA scheme for systematics of the whole genus. Syst Appl Microbiol 2012; 35:7–18 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Moore WEC, Stackebrandt E, Kandler O, Colwell RR, Krichevsky MI et al. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1987; 37:463–464 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 2018; 9:5114 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005916
Loading
Streptomyces hilarionis sp. nov. and Streptomyces hayashii sp. nov., two new strains associated with potato scab in Brazil
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 73, 005916 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.005916
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005916
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005916
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error