1887

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY logo

Volume 73, Issue 5

sp. nov., isolated from soil of weathering dolomite in a karst area No Access

Abstract

A Gram-stain-positive, aerobic actinomycete strain, designated KLBMP 8922, was isolated from a soil sample collected from weathering dolomite crust in Guizhou Province, PR China. KLBMP 8922 showed the 16S rRNA gene similarities to CCTCC AA 206006 (98.7 %), VN07A0015 (98.3 %) and M24DS4 (98.2 %). The taxonomic status of this strain was investigated by using a polyphasic approach. The aerial mycelia of KLBMP 8922 formed spore chains, and spores were cylindrical with smooth surfaces. The whole-cell sugars were ribose, mannose and galactose with traces of glucose and xylose. The diagnostic amino acids of the cell wall were -diaminopimelic acid, alanine and glutamic acid. The predominant menaquinones were MK-9(H) and MK-9(H). The diagnostic phospholipids were diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylinositolmannoside, phosphatidylethanolamine, an unidentified phospholipid and an unidentified lipid. The major cellular fatty acids (>10 %) were iso-C, iso-C and iso-CH. The genomic DNA G+C content was 72.0 mol%. The digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) value between KLBMP 8922 and CCTCC AA 206006 was 24.1 %, and the average nucleotide identity (ANI) value was 81.0 %. On the basis of a combination of morphological, chemotaxonomic and phylogenetic characteristics, strain KLBMP 8922 represents a novel species of the genus for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain was KLBMP 8922 (= CGMCC 1.19360 = NBRC 115572).

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): 16S rDNA , actinobacteria , polyphasic taxonomy and Streptomycetaceae
Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (Award KYCX21_2608)
    • Principle Award Recipient: LingxiaoLiu
  • the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (Award KYCX21_2609)
    • Principle Award Recipient: YaZhang
  • the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (Award KYCX22_2826)
    • Principle Award Recipient: JiaqiYao
  • the Key Research Plan of Modern Agriculture of Xuzhou City (Award KC20049)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Cheng-LiangCao
  • State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry (Award SKLEG2020207)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Cheng-LiangCao
  • the National Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Award BK20210919)
    • Principle Award Recipient: LudanLi
© 2023 The Authors
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005907
2023-05-30
2024-05-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Waksman SA, Henrici AT. The nomenclature and classification of the actinomycetes. J Bacteriol 1943; 46:337–341 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Nouioui I, Carro L, García-López M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Woyke T et al. Genome-based taxonomic classification of the phylum Actinobacteria. Front Microbiol 2018; 9:2007 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Nagai A, Khan ST, Tamura T, Takagi M, Shin-Ya K. Streptomyces aomiensis sp. nov., isolated from a soil sample using the membrane-filter method. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:947–950 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Komaki H, Tamura T. Transfer of Streptomyces catbensis Sakiyama et al. 2014 and Streptomyces seranimatus Wang et al. 2012 to Yinghuangia catbensis comb. nov. and Yinghuangia seranimata comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:2263–2267 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Sakiyama Y, Giang NM, Miyadoh S, Luong DT, Van Hop D et al. Streptomyces catbensis sp. nov., isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:2146–2151 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang Y-X, Zhi X-Y, Chen H-H, Zhang Y-Q, Tang SK et al. Streptomyces serianimatus sp. nov., isolated from a rhizophere soil. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2007; 92:201–206 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Nonomura H, Ohara Y. Distribution of actinomycetes in soil. VI. A culture method effective for both preferential isolation and enumeration of Microbispora and Streptosporangium strains in soil. J Ferment Technol 1969; 47:463–469
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Hayakawa M. Studies on the isolation and distribution of rare actinomycetes in soil. Actinomycetologica 2008; 22:12–19 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Shirling EB, Gottlieb D. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1966; 16:313–340 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Li W-J, Xu P, Schumann P, Zhang Y-Q, Pukall R et al. Georgenia ruanii sp. nov., a novel actinobacterium isolated from forest soil in Yunnan (China), and emended description of the genus Georgenia. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:1424–1428 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 1971; 20:406 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Kimura M. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution Cambridge University Press; 1983 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Cao C, Xu T, Liu J, Cai X, Sun Y et al. Actinomadura deserti sp. nov., isolated from desert soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:2930–2935 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Felsenstein Joseph. Confidence limits on phylogenies: approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Lim HJ, Lee EH, Yoon Y, Chua B, Son A. Portable lysis apparatus for rapid single-step DNA extraction of Bacillus subtilis. J Appl Microbiol 2016; 120:379–387 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Li R, Zhu H, Ruan J, Qian W, Fang X et al. De novo assembly of human genomes with massively parallel short read sequencing. Genome Res 2010; 20:265–272 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Li R, Li Y, Kristiansen K, Wang J. SOAP: short oligonucleotide alignment program. Bioinformatics 2008; 24:713–714 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D801–D807 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP et al. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:6614–6624 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Moore WEC, Stackebrandt E, Kandler O, Colwell RR, Krichevsky MI et al. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1987; 37:463–464 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Chun J, Rainey FA. Integrating genomics into the taxonomy and systematics of the bacteria and archaea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:316–324 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Waksman SA. The Actinomycetes: A Summary of Current Knowledge New York: Ronald Press; 1967
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Qin S, Bai J-L, Wang Y, Feng W-W, Yuan B et al. Tamaricihabitans halophyticus gen. nov., sp. nov., an endophytic actinomycete of the family Pseudonocardiaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:4662–4668 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Kelly KL. Inter-Society Color Council–National Bureau of Standards Color-Name Charts Illustrated with Centroid Colors Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1964
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Williams ST, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Wellington EM, Sneath PH et al. Numerical classification of Streptomyces and related genera. J Gen Microbiol 1983; 129:1743–1813 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Xu P, Li W-J, Tang S-K, Zhang Y-Q, Chen G-Z et al. Naxibacter alkalitolerans gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel member of the family 'Oxalobacteraceae' isolated from China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:1149–1153 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Gordon RE, Barnett DA, Handerhan JE, Pang CH-N. Nocardia coeliaca, Nocardia autotrophica, and the nocardin strain. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1974; 24:54–63 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Williams S, Goodfellow M, Alderson G. Genus Streptomyces Waksman and Henrici 1943. Bergeys Manual of Systematic Bacteriology Baltimore: Williams & Willkins; 1989
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Kurup PV, Schmitt JA. Numerical taxonomy of Nocardia. Can J Microbiol 1973; 19:1035–1048 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Smibert RM, Krieg NR. Phenotypic Characterization. Methods for General Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Staneck JL, Roberts GD. Simplified approach to identification of aerobic actinomycetes by thin-layer chromatography. Appl Microbiol 1974; 28:226–231 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Minnikin DE, Collins MD, Goodfellow M. Fatty acid and polar lipid composition in the classification of Cellulomonas, Oerskovia and related taxa. J Appl Bacteriol 1979; 47:87–95 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Collins MD, Pirouz T, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Distribution of menaquinones in actinomycetes and corynebacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1977; 100:221–230 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Kroppenstedt RM. Separation of bacterial menaquinones by HPLC using reverse phase (RP18) and a silver loaded ion exchanger as stationary phases. J Liq Chromatogr 1982; 5:2359–2367 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Gao R, Liu C, Zhao J, Jia F, Yu C et al. Micromonospora jinlongensis sp. nov., isolated from muddy soil in China and emended description of the genus Micromonospora. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2014; 105:307–315 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids Newark, DE: MIDI Inc; 1990
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005907
Loading
Yinghuangia soli sp. nov., isolated from soil of weathering dolomite in a karst area
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 73, 005907 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.005907
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005907
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005907
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error