1887

Abstract

Three bacterial strains, H21R-40 and H21R-36 from garlic () and H25R-14 from onion (), were isolated from plant rhizospheres sampled in the Republic of Korea. Results of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis revealed the highest sequence similarity of strain H21R-40 to subsp. CBX151 (97.3 %) and JW-1 (97.2 %), and strain H25R-14 to HDW9B (98.8 %) and Re6 (98.4 %), while the sequence similarity between strains H21R-40 and H21R-36 was 99.8 %. According to the phylogenomic tree, strains H21R-40 with H21R-36 formed an independent clade separable from other species within the genus and strain H25R-14 clustered with HDW9B, HDW9A and HDW9C. Strains H21R-40 and H21R-36 had orthologous average nucleotide identity (OrthoANI) and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) values (98.1 % and 86.9 %, respectively) higher than the threshold ranges for species delineation (95–96 % and 70 %, respectively). The OrthoANI and dDDH values between two strains (H21R-40 and H25R-14) and the type strains of species of the genus were lower than 81 and 24 %, respectively. The peptidoglycan type of three strains was type B1. The major menaquinones and major polar lipids of the strains were MK-11 and MK-10, and diphosphatidylglycerol, phatidylglycerol and an unidentified glycolipid, respectively. The major fatty acids (more than 10 % of the total fatty acids) of strains H21R-40 and H21R-36 were anteiso-C, anteiso-C and iso-C, and those of strain H25R-14 were anteiso-C and iso-C. The phenotypic, chemotaxonomic and genotypic data obtained in this study showed that the strains represent two novel species of the genus , named sp. nov. (H21R-40 and H21R-36) and sp. nov. (H25R-14). The respective type strains are H21R-40 (=DSM 114348=JCM 35241=KACC 21839=NBRC 115481) and H25R-14 (=DSM 114346=JCM 35239=KACC 21837=NBRC 115479).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005883
2023-05-15
2024-05-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Takeuchi M, Weiss N, Schumann P, Yokota A. Leucobacter komagatae gen. nov., sp. nov., a new aerobic Gram-positive, nonsporulating rod with 2,4-diaminobutyric acid in the cell wall. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1996; 46:967–971 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chun BH, Lee HJ, Jeong SE, Schumann P, Jeon CO. Leucobacter ruminantium sp. nov., isolated from the bovine rumen. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2634–2639 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Schumann P, Pukall R. Leucobacter weissii sp. nov., an isolate from activated sludge once described as first representative of the peptidoglycan variation B2δ, and emended description of the genus Leucobacter. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:5244–5251 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Benga L, Spröer C, Schumann P, Verbarg S, Bunk B et al. Leucobacter muris sp. nov., isolated from the nose of a laboratory mouse. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:2095–2100 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5607–5612 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Yun J-H, Roh SW, Kim M-S, Jung M-J, Park E-J et al. Leucobacter salsicius sp. nov., from a salt-fermented food. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:502–506 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Clark LC, Hodgkin J. Leucobacter musarum subsp. musarum sp. nov., subsp. nov., Leucobacter musarum subsp. japonicus subsp. nov., and Leucobacter celer subsp. astrifaciens subsp. nov., three nematopathogenic bacteria isolated from Caenorhabditis, with an emended description of Leucobacter celer. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:3977–3984 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hyun DW, Sung H, Kim PS, Yun JH, Bae JW. Leucobacter coleopterorum sp. nov., Leucobacter insecticola sp. nov., and Leucobacter viscericola sp. nov., isolated from the intestine of the diving beetles, Cybister brevis and Cybister lewisianus, and emended description of the genus Leucobacter. J Microbiol 2021; 59:360–368 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kämpfer P, McInroy JA, Clermont D, Neumann-Schaal M, Criscuolo A et al. Leucobacter soli sp. nov., from soil amended with humic acid. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:5156 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Sturm G, Jacobs J, Spröer C, Schumann P, Gescher J. Leucobacter chromiiresistens sp. nov., a chromate-resistant strain. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:956–960 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Sun L-N, Pan D-D, Wu X-W, Yang E-D, Hua R-M et al. Leucobacter triazinivorans sp. nov., a s-triazine herbicide prometryn-degrading bacterium isolated from sludge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:204–210 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Querejeta GA, Rossi L, Monroy AM, Raiger Iustman LJ, Vullo DL. Screening of indigenous microorganisms as potential biofertilisers for periurban horticulture areas. J sustain dev energy water environ syst 2022; 10:1–14 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu M, Zhao X, Li X, Wu X, Zhou H et al. Antagonistic effects of Delia antiqua (Diptera: Anthomyiidae)-associated bacteria against four phytopathogens. J Econ Entomol 2021; 114:597–610 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. eds Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics New York, FL: John Wiley and Sons; 1991 pp 115–175
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22:4673–4680 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 1971; 20:406 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Nurk S, Walenz BP, Rhie A, Vollger MR, Logsdon GA et al. HiCanu: accurate assembly of segmental duplications, satellites, and allelic variants from high-fidelity long reads. Genome Res 2020; 30:1291–1305 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Chin C-S, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J et al. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Methods 2013; 10:563–569 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Manni M, Berkeley MR, Seppey M, Simão FA, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO update: novel and streamlined workflows along with broader and deeper phylogenetic coverage for scoring of eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral genomes. Mol Biol Evol 2021; 38:4647–4654 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP et al. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:6614–6624 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Na S-I, Kim YO, Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Baek I et al. UBCG: Up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Microbiol 2018; 56:280–285 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park S-C, Chun J. OrthoANI: an improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1100–1103 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:117–134 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ et al. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:D206–14 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Arkin AP, Cottingham RW, Henry CS, Harris NL, Stevens RL et al. KBase: the United States department of energy systems biology knowledgebase. Nat Biotechnol 2018; 36:566–569 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Green IIIF, Clausen CA. Copper tolerance of brown-rot fungi: oxalic acid production in southern pine treated with arsenic-free preservatives. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 2005; 56:75–79 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hassan AS. Inorganic-based pesticides: a review article. Egypt Sci J Pestic 2019; 5:39–52
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Cervantes C, Campos-García J. Reduction and efflux of chromate by bacteria. In Nies DH, Silver S. eds Molecular Microbiology of Heavy Metals Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2007 pp 407–420
    [Google Scholar]
  33. O’Neill AG, Beaupre BA, Zheng Y, Liu D, Moran GR. NfoR: chromate reductase or flavin mononucleotide reductase?. Appl Environ Microbiol 2020; 86:e01758-20 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Bauer AW, Kirby WMM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol 1996; 45:493–496
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Sasser M. Technical Note 101: Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids Newark, DE: MIDI; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Hamada M, Yamamura H, Komukai C, Tamura T, Suzuki K et al. Luteimicrobium album sp. nov., a novel actinobacterium isolated from a lichen collected in Japan, and emended description of the genus Luteimicrobium. J Antibiot 2012; 65:427–431 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Hamada M, Tamura T, Yamamura H, Suzuki K-I, Hayakawa M. Lysinimicrobium mangrovi gen. nov., sp. nov., an actinobacterium isolated from the rhizosphere of a mangrove. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:1731–1735 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Schleifer KH, Kandler O. Peptidoglycan types of bacterial cell walls and their taxonomic implications. Bacteriol Rev 1972; 36:407–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhu D, Zhang P, Li P, Wu J, Xie C et al. Description of Leucobacter holotrichiae sp. nov., isolated from the gut of Holotrichia oblita larvae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1857–1861 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Her J, Lee SS. Leucobacter humi sp. nov., isolated from forest soil. Curr Microbiol 2015; 71:235–242 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005883
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005883
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error