1887

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY logo

Volume 73, Issue 5

sp. nov., isolated from marine sponge sp. No Access

Abstract

A novel bacterial strain, designated as WHS-Z9, was isolated from marine sponge sp. collected from Weihai (37° 25′ N, 121° 58′ E), Shandong Province, PR China. Cells of strain WHS-Z9 were Gram-stain-positive, non-spore-forming, non-motile, short-rod-shaped and light yellow-pigmented. The strain could grow at 10–40 °C (optimum, 20 °C), pH 4.5–9.5 (optimum, pH 8.5) and 2–14 % (w/v) NaCl (optimum, 4 %). The 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain WHS-Z9 showed 98.7  % similarity to that of NBRC 14811, 98.5  % to FXJ8.269 and 98.4 % to BBH7. The phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences revealed that strain WHS-Z9 was clustered with o2. The whole genome of WHS-Z9 was approximately 4 217 721 bp in size with a G+C content of 65.2  %. The average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) values among WHS-Z9 and other type strains were 83.3–85.5 % (ANI based on ), 86.4–87.9  % (ANI based on MUMmer) and 41.9–57.5 % (dDDH). Percentage of conserved protein values between the genomes of strain WHS-Z9 and members of genera were 76.8–82.9 %, while the average amino acid identity (AAI) values were 83.7–87.0  %. The dDDH, ANI, AAI and POCP values were below the standard cut-off criteria for the delineation of bacterial species. The sole respiratory quinone in strain WHS-Z9 was MK-8(H), and the predominant fatty acids were anteiso-C and anteiso-C. The major polar lipids of WHS-Z9 consisted of diphosphatidylglycerol and glycolipid. The diagnostic cell-wall diamino acid of strain WHS-Z9 was -diaminopimelic acid. Based on the data obtained in this study, strain WHS-Z9 (=MCCC 1K07845=KCTC 49848) should be classified as the type strain of a novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed.

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): Brevibacterium spongiae sp. nov. , marine sponge and polyphasic taxonomy
Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (Award 2018YFA0901901)
    • Principle Award Recipient: ZhiyongLi
© 2023 Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005869
2023-05-15
2024-05-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Breed RS. The Brevibacteriaceae fam. nov. of order Eubacteriales. Rias Commun VI Congr Int Microbiol Roma 1953; 1:13–14
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5607–5612 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Pei SX, Niu SW, Xie FQ, Wang WJ, Zhang S et al. Brevibacterium limosum sp. nov. Brevibacterium pigmenatum sp. nov., and Brevibacterium atlanticum sp. nov., three novel dye decolorizing actinobacteria isolated from ocean sediments. J Microbiol 2021; 59:898–910 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Gavrish EY, Krauzova VI, Potekhina NV, Karasev SG, Plotnikova EG et al. Three new species of Brevibacteria, Brevibacterium antiquum sp. nov., Brevibacterium aurantiacum sp. nov., and Brevibacterium permense sp. nov. Microbiol 2004; 73:218–225 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen P, Zhang L, Wang J, Ruan J, Han X et al. Brevibacterium sediminis sp. nov., isolated from deep-sea sediments from the Carlsberg and Southwest Indian Ridges. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:5268–5274 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Collins MD, Jones D, Keddie RM, Sneath PHA. Reclassification of Chromobacterium iodinum (Davis) in a redefined genus Brevibacterium (Breed) as Brevibacterium iodinum nom.rev., comb.nov. J Gen Microbiol 1980; 120:1–10 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Collins MD, Farrow JA, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Brevibacterium casei sp. nov. and Brevibacterium epidermidis sp. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 1983; 4:388–395 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Kumar A, İnce İA, Katı A, Chakraborty R. Brevibacterium siliguriense sp. nov., a facultatively oligotrophic bacterium isolated from river water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:511–515 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Yan Y, Xing X, Sun Z, Li J, Hao S et al. Brevibacterium renqingii sp. nov., isolated from the Daqu of Baijiu. Arch Microbiol 2021; 203:2291–2296 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Collins MD et al. The genus Brevibacterium. In Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer KH, Stackebrandt E. eds Prokaryotes New York: Springer; 2006 pp 1013–1019
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1977; 74:5463–5467 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:4876–4882 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt H-H, Rognes T et al. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:3100–3108 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:955–964 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Delcher AL, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg SL. Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER. Nucl Acids Res 1999; 27:4636–4641 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Salzberg SL, Delcher AL, Kasif S, White O. Microbial gene identification using interpolated Markov models. Nucl Acids Res 1998; 26:544–548 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC, Salzberg SL. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics 2007; 23:673–679 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:1792–1797 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:117–134 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Qin Q-L, Xie B-B, Zhang X-Y, Chen X-L, Zhou B-C et al. A proposed genus boundary for the prokaryotes based on genomic insights. J Bacteriol 2014; 196:2210–2215 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Hua Z-S, Qu Y-N, Zhu Q, Zhou E-M, Qi Y-L et al. Genomic inference of the metabolism and evolution of the archaeal phylum Aigarchaeota. Nat Commun 2018; 9:2832 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Blin K, Shaw S, Kloosterman AM, Charlop-Powers Z, van Wezel GP et al. AntiSMASH 6.0: improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:W29–W35 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu Y, Yue SJ, Bilal M, Jan M, Wang W et al. Development of artificial synthetic pathway of endophenazines in Pseudomonas chlororaphis P3. Biology 2022; 11:363–375 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Cimmino A, Evidente A, Mathieu V, Andolfi A, Lefranc F et al. Phenazines and cancer. Nat Prod Rep 2012; 29:487–501 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60–74 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Chen YL, Sang J, Sun W, Song QQ, Li ZY. Mycetocola spongiae sp. nov., isolated from deep-sea sponge Cacospongia mycofijiensis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:005291 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Kovacs N. Identification of Pseudomonas pyocyanea by the oxidase reaction. Nature 1956; 178:703–704 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Humphries R, Bobenchik AM, Hindler JA, Schuetz AN. Overview of changes to the clinical and laboratory standards institute Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, M100, 31st Edition. J Clin Microbiol 2021; 59:e0021321 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Vancanneyti M, Witt S, Abraham WR, Kersters K, Fredrickson HL. Fatty acid content in whole-cell hydrolysates and phospholipid and phospholipid fractions of Pseudomonads: a taxonomic evaluation. Syst Appl Microbiol 1996; 19:528–540 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Sasser M. Technical note 101: Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids Newark, DE: MIDI, Inc.; 1990; 201–7
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Sakamoto M, Sakurai N, Tanno H, Iino T, Ohkuma M et al. Genome-based, phenotypic and chemotaxonomic classification of Faecalibacterium strains: proposal of three novel species Faecalibacterium duncaniae sp. nov., Faecalibacterium hattorii sp. nov. and Faecalibacterium gallinarum sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:1–11 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Komagata K, Suzuki K. Lipid and cell wall analysis in bacterial systematics. Meth Microbiol 1987; 19:161–207
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Collins MD, Jones D. Distribution of isoprenoid quinone structural types in bacteria and their taxonomic implication. Microbiol Rev 1981; 45:316–354 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Meth 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Tindall BJ. Lipid composition of Halobacterium lacusprofundi. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1990; 66:199–202
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005869
Loading
Brevibacterium spongiae sp. nov., isolated from marine sponge Hymeniacidon sp.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 73, 005869 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.005869
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005869
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005869
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error