1887

Abstract

Three Gram-positive-staining strains FJAT-49754, FJAT-49682 and FJAT-49731 were isolated from the citrus rhizosphere soil sample. These strains showed the highest 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity with the type strain of (97.8–97.9 %). The 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities between strains FJAT-49754, FJAT-49682, and FJAT-49731 were 99.9 %. The average nucleotide identity (ANI) values between strains FJAT-49754, FJAT-49682 and FJAT-49731 were above 96 %, while the ANI values with the members of the genus were below 95 %, which were below the cut-off level for prokaryotic species delineation. The above results suggest that strains FJAT-49754, FJAT-49682 and FJAT-49731 belong to a novel species of the genus . Growth of strain FJAT-49754 was observed at 10–40 °C (optimum at 30 °C, pH 6.0–10.0 (optimum at pH 8.0), and NaCl tolerance up to 7 % (w/v) (optimum at 1 %). MK-7 was the only menaquinone detected in strain FJAT-49754, and the main polar lipids were diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol and phosphatidylethanolamine. The major fatty acids of strain FJAT-49754 were anteiso-C iso-C and C. The genomic DNA G+C content of strain FJAT-49754 was 38.7 %. Based on the above results, strain FJAT-49754 represents a novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov., is proposed. The type strain is FJAT-49754 (=CCTCC AB 2019211=LMG 31589).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (Award 2020J02015)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Shun-GuiZhou
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award U21A20295)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Shun-GuiZhou
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005833
2023-05-02
2024-05-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Hiltner L. Uber nevere Erfahrungen und Probleme auf dem Gebiet der Boden Bakteriologie und unter besonderer Beurchsichtigung der Grundungung und Broche. Arbeit Deut Landw Ges Berlin 1904; 98:59–78
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Narsing Rao MP, Li WJ. Diversity of Actinobacteria in various habitats. In Karthik L. eds Actinobacteria: Microbiology to Synthetic Biology Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2022 pp 37–58
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Narsing Rao MP, Lohmaneeratana K, Bunyoo C, Thamchaipenet A. Actinobacteria-plant interactions in alleviating abiotic stress. Plants 2022; 11:2976 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bais HP, Weir TL, Perry LG, Gilroy S, Vivanco JM. The role of root exudates in rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2006; 57:233–266 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Schirawski J, Perlin MH. Plant-Microbe Interaction 2017-The Good, the Bad and the Diverse. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19:1374 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Saeed Q, Xiukang W, Haider FU, Kučerik J, Mumtaz MZ et al. Rhizosphere bacteria in plant growth promotion, biocontrol, and bioremediation of contaminated sites: a comprehensive review of effects and mechanisms. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:10529 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu GH, Narsing Rao MP, Chen QQ, Che JM, Shi H et al. Lederbergia citri sp. nov., and Lederbergia citrisecundus sp. nov., isolated from citrus rhizosphere. Curr Microbiol 2022; 79:43 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gupta RS, Patel S, Saini N, Chen S. Robust demarcation of 17 distinct Bacillus species clades, proposed as novel Bacillaceae genera, by phylogenomics and comparative genomic analyses: description of Robertmurraya kyonggiensis sp. nov. and proposal for an emended genus Bacillus limiting it only to the members of the Subtilis and Cereus clades of species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5753–5798 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of Prokaryotic Names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5607–5612 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gibson T. The urea-decomposing microflora of soils. I. Description and classification of the organisms. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde, Infektionskrankheiten und Hygiene Abteilung II 1935; 92:364–380
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu B, Liu GH, Sengonca C, Schumann P, Che JM et al. Bacillus wuyishanensis sp. nov., isolated from rhizosphere soil of a medical plant, Prunella vulgaris. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:2030–2035 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Choi JH, Cha CJ. Bacillus panacisoli sp. nov., isolated from ginseng soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:901–906 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bibi F, Chung EJ, Jeon CO, Chung YR. Bacillus graminis sp. nov., an endophyte isolated from a coastal dune plant. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:1567–1571 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Heyndrickx M, Logan NA, Lebbe L, Rodríguez-Díaz M, Forsyth G et al. Bacillus galactosidilyticus sp. nov., an alkali-tolerant beta-galactosidase producer. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:617–621 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Narsing Rao MP, Dong ZY, Kan Y, Dong L, Li S et al. Description of Paenibacillus tepidiphilus sp. nov., isolated from a tepid spring. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:1977–1981 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kovacs N. Identification of Pseudomonas pyocyanea by the oxidase reaction. Nature 1956; 178:703 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Dong ZY, Narsing Rao MP, Wang HF, Fang BZ, Liu YH et al. Transcriptomic analysis of two endophytes involved in enhancing salt stress ability of Arabidopsis thaliana. Sci Total Environ 2019; 686:107–117 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22:4673–4680 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evol 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Stackebrandt E. Taxonomic parameters revisited: tarnished gold standards. Microbiology Today 2006; 33:152–155
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kim M, Oh HS, Park SC, Chun J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:346–351
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Collins MD, Pirouz T, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Distribution of menaquinones in actinomycetes and corynebacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1977; 100:221–230 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kroppenstedt RM. Separation of bacterial menaquinones by HPLC using reverse phase (RP18) and a silver loaded Ion exchanger as stationary phases. J Liq Chromatogr 1982; 5:2359–2367 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Minnikin DE, Collins MD, Goodfellow M. Fatty acid and polar lipid composition in the classification of Cellulomonas, Oerskovia and related taxa. J Appl Bacteriol 1979; 47:87–95 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Collins MD, Jones D. Lipids in the classification and identification of Coryneform bacteria containing peptidoglycans based on 2, 4-diaminobutyric acid. J Appl Microbiol 1980; 48:459–470 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sasser M. MIDI technical note 101. In Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids Newark, DE: 1990 pp 1–7
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Luo R, Liu B, Xie Y, Li Z, Huang W et al. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience 2012; 1:18 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Eren AM, Esen ÖC, Quince C, Vineis JH, Morrison HG et al. Anvi’o: an advanced analysis and visualization platform for omics data. PeerJ 2015; 3:e1319 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:1792–1797 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt HH, Rognes T et al. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:3100–3108 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:955–964 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Pritchard L, Glover RH, Humphris S, Elphinstone JG, Toth IK. Genomics and taxonomy in diagnostics for food security: soft-rotting enterobacterial plant pathogens. Anal Methods 2016; 8:12–24 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Hoffmann T, Wensing A, Brosius M, Steil L, Völker U et al. Osmotic control of opuA expression in Bacillus subtilis and its modulation in response to intracellular glycine betaine and proline pools. J Bacteriol 2013; 195:510–522 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005833
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005833
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error