1887

Abstract

We isolated a paraffin oil-degrading bacterial strain from a mixture of oil-based drill cutting and paddy soil, and characterized the strain using a polyphasic approach. The Gram-positive, aerobic, rod-shaped and non-spore-forming strain (SCAU 2101) grew optimally at 50 °C, pH 7.0 and 0.5 % (w/v) NaCl. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequence indicated that the strain represented a distinct clade in the genus neighbouring LMG 28482 (97.1 %). The genome size and DNA G+C content of the strain were 3 969 430 bp and 63.1 mol%, respectively. Whole genome based phylogenomic analyses showed that the average nucleotide identity and digital DNA–DNA hybridization values between strain SCAU 2101 and LMG 28482 were 77.5 and 21.2 %, respectively. The major respiratory quinone was Q-10. The dominant fatty acids were C cyclo 8 (50.6 %), summed feature 8 (C 7 and/or C 6; 22.5 %) and C (13.8 %). The polar lipids of the strain included phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylmonomethylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylcholine and diphosphatidylglycerol. Based on the results, strain SCAU 2101 was considered to represent a novel species in the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is SCAU 2101 (= CCTCC AB 2021125=KCTC 92067).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005769
2023-03-31
2024-05-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Conlette OC. Aerobic degradation of paraffin and olefin synthetic based drilling mud base fluids by Gulf of Guinea sediments under natural environmental conditions. Life Sci J 2011; 8:238–244
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Fattah KA, Lashin A. Investigation of mud density and weighting materials effect on drilling fluid filter cake properties and formation damage. J African Earth Sci 2016; 117:345–357 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Fink JK. Chapter 1 - Drilling Muds. In Fink JK. editor Petroleum Engineer’s Guide to Oil Field Chemicals and Fluids Boston: Gulf Professional Publishing; 2012 pp pp 1–59
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cerqueira VS, Peralba M, Camargo FAO, Bento FM. Comparison of bioremediation strategies for soil impacted with petrochemical oily sludge. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 2014; 95:338–345 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Doronina NV, Kaparullina EN, Trotsenko YA, Nörtemann B, Bucheli-Witschel M et al. Chelativorans multitrophicus gen. nov., sp. nov. and Chelativorans oligotrophicus sp. nov., aerobic EDTA-degrading bacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:1044–1051 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kämpfer P, Arun AB, Busse H-J, Zhang Z-L, Young C-C et al. Chelativorans intermedius sp. nov. and proposal to reclassify Thermovum composti as Chelativorans composti comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:1646–1652 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Yabe S, Aiba Y, Sakai Y, Hazaka M, Yokota A. Thermovum composti gen. nov., sp. nov., an alphaproteobacterium from compost. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:2991–2996 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Meng D, Liu Y-L, Gu P-F, Fan X-Y, Huang Z-S et al. Chelativorans xinjiangense sp. nov., a novel bacterial species isolated from soil in Xinjiang, China. Arch Microbiol 2021; 203:693–699 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Meng D, Liu Y-L, Gu P-F, Fan X-Y, Huang Z-S et al. Chelativorans alearense sp. nov., a novel bacterial species isolated from soil in Alear, China. Curr Microbiol 2021; 78:1656–1661 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cerny G. Studies on the aminopeptidase test for the distinction of Gram-negative from Gram-positive bacteria. Eur J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1978; 5:113–122 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu Y-L, Meng D, Li R-R, Gu P-F, Fan X-Y et al. Rhodoligotrophos defluvii sp. nov., isolated from activated sludge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:3830–3836 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. eds Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics J Wiley and Sons; 1991
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007; 23:2947–2948 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Systematic Zoology 1971; 20:406 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt H-H, Rognes T et al. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:3100–3108 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kroppenstedt RM. Separation of bacterial menaquinones by HPLC using reverse phase (RP18) and a silver loaded ion exchanger as stationary phases. J Liq Chromat 1982; 5:2359–2367 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sasser M. Technical note 101: Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids Newark, DE: MIDI; 1991
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Komagata K, Suzuki K-I. 4 Lipid and cell-wall analysis in bacterial systematics. In Colwell RR, Grigorova R. eds Methods in Microbiology Academic Press; 1988 pp 161–207
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Bart Total petroleum hydrocarbons by gas chromatography in colombian waters and soils. Am J Environ Sci 2012; 8:396–402 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Stackebrandt E, Goebel BM. Taxonomic note: a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1994; 44:846–849 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005769
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005769
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error