1887

Abstract

The genus belongs to the family and its members are widely distributed in the environment. Taxonomic descriptions of strains LS1R47 and LS1R49 isolated from the Laigu glacier on the Tibetan Plateau, China, are presented in this study. Both strains were psychrotolerant, Gram-stain-negative, aerobic and rod-shaped. The comparative analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that strain LS1R47 was closest to CIP 105534 (98.90 %) and strain LS1R49 was closest to 983-08 (98.73 %). The 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity, average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) values between the two novel isolates were 99.4, 86.0 and 30.9 %, respectively. The ANI and dDDH values between strains LS1R47 and LS1R49 and their closely relatives were below 87.6 and 33.3 %, respectively. Phylogenomic analysis showed that the two strains cluster together with ATCC 29551. Both strains contained MK-6 as sole quinone, phosphatidylethanolamine as the principal polar lipid, and summed feature 3 (iso-C 2-OH and/or C ω7c), iso-C 3-OH, C 3-OH and iso-C 3-OH as the main fatty acids. These results indicated that strains LS1R47 and LS1R49 represented two novel species within the genus . Therefore, we propose two novel species, sp. nov. (LS1R47=CGMCC 1.11577=NBRC 113654) and sp. nov. (LS1R49=CGMCC 1.11581=NBRC 113652).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award 32170007)
    • Principle Award Recipient: QingLiu
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005750
2023-03-31
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/73/3/ijsem005750.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005750&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bergey DH, Harrison FC, Breed RS, Hammer BW, Huntoon FM et al. Genus II. Flavobacterium gen. nov. In Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 1st ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins; 1923 pp 97–117
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernardet J-F, Segers P, Vancanneyt M, Berthe F, Kersters K et al. Cutting a Gordian knot: emended classification and description of the genus Flavobacterium, emended description of the family Flavobacteriaceae, and proposal of Flavobacterium hydatis nom. nov. (basonym, Cytophaga aquatilis Strohl and Tait 1978). Int J Syst Bacteriol 1996; 46:128–148 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dong K, Chen F, Du Y, Wang G. Flavobacterium enshiense sp. nov., isolated from soil, and emended descriptions of the genus Flavobacterium and Flavobacterium cauense, Flavobacterium saliperosum and Flavobacterium suncheonense. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:886–892 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kang JY, Chun J, Jahng KY. Flavobacterium aciduliphilum sp. nov., isolated from freshwater, and emended description of the genus Flavobacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:1633–1638 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kuo I, Saw J, Kapan DD, Christensen S, Kaneshiro KY et al. Flavobacterium akiainvivens sp. nov., from decaying wood of Wikstroemia oahuensis, Hawai’i, and emended description of the genus Flavobacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:3280–3286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bernardet JF, Bowman JP. The genus Flavobacterium gen. nov. In The Prokaryotes: A Handbook on the Biology of Bacteria Springer, New York, NY; 2006 pp 481–531
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bernardet JF, Nakagawa Y, Holmes B. Subcommittee on the taxonomy of Flavobacterium and Cytophaga-like bacteria of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes. Proposed minimal standards for describing new taxa of the family Flavobacteriaceae and emended description of the family. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:1049–1070 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5607–5612 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kim Y-J, Kim S-R, Nguyen N-L, Yang D-C. Flavobacterium ginsengisoli sp. nov., isolated from soil of a ginseng field. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:4289–4293 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kristyanto S, Nguyen TM, Chaudhary DK, Lee SS, Kim J. Characterization of Flavobacterium aquimarinum sp. nov., a halotolerant bacterium isolated from seawater. J Microbiol 2018; 56:317–323 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fujii D, Nagai F, Watanabe Y, Shirasawa Y. Flavobacterium longum sp. nov. and Flavobacterium urocaniciphilum sp. nov., isolated from a wastewater treatment plant, and emended descriptions of Flavobacterium caeni and Flavobacterium terrigena. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:1488–1494 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Zamora L, Fernández-Garayzábal JF, Svensson-Stadler LA, Palacios MA, Domínguez L et al. Flavobacterium oncorhynchi sp. nov., a new species isolated from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Syst Appl Microbiol 2012; 35:86–91 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu Q, Liu HC, Yang LL, Xin YH. Flavobacterium franklandianum sp. nov. and Flavobacterium gawalongense sp. nov., isolated from glaciers on the Tibetan Plateau. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:004868 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Castro-Sowinski S. The Flavobacterium Genus in the Plant: Ecological, Physiological, and Applicative Insights. Microbial: From Environmental to Industrial Sustainability Singapore: Springer; 2016 pp 189–207 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Chaudhary DK, Kim DU, Kim D, Kim J. Flavobacterium petrolei sp. nov., a novel psychrophilic, diesel-degrading bacterium isolated from oil-contaminated Arctic soil. Sci Rep 2019; 9:4134 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Paun VI, Banciu RM, Lavin P, Vasilescu A, Fanjul-Bolado P et al. Antarctic aldehyde dehydrogenase from Flavobacterium PL002 as a potent catalyst for acetaldehyde determination in wine. Sci Rep 2022; 12:17301 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Liu Q, Liu H, Zhang J, Zhou Y, Xin Y. Cryobacterium levicorallinum sp. nov., a psychrophilic bacterium isolated from glacier ice. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:2819–2822 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. eds Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1991 pp 115–175
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:772–780 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:268–274 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M et al. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 2011; 28:2731–2739 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2068–2069 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 2018; 9:5114 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D801–D807 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Na S-I, Kim YO, Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Baek I et al. UBCG: Up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Microbiol 2018; 56:280–285 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 2000; 17:540–552
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Wayne LG, Brenner DJ, Colwell RR, Grimont PAD, Kandler O et al. International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1987; 37:463–464
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR. eds Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Smibert RM, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization. In Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR. eds Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994 pp 607–654
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Collins MD. Isoprenoidquinone analysis in classification and identification. In M G, DE M. eds Chemical Methods in Bacterial Systematics London: Academic Press; 1985 pp 267–287
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Komagata K, Suzuki K. 4 lipid and cell-wall analysis in bacterial systematics. Methods Microbiol 1988161–207
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Sasser M. Technical Note 101: Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids Newark, DE: MIDI; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Bernardet JF, Bowman JP. The genus Flavobacterium. In White WB, Parte AC. eds Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology New York, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London: Springer; 2010 pp 112–155
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005750
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005750
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error