1887

Abstract

A novel bacterial strain, CDC141, was isolated from sputum samples of a patient with pulmonary infection in Hainan Province, PR China. We performed a polyphasic study to assess the taxonomic position of the new species. Based on the results of 16S rRNA gene sequence analyses, strain CDC141 belonged to the genus with the highest sequence similarity to NBRC 15556 (98.84 %) and s RB20 (98.54 %). The gene sequence-based phylogenetic and phylogenomic trees further showed that the novel strain was clustered in a distinct clade adjacent to DSM 44290. The DNA G+C content of strain CDC141 was 68.57 mol%. The genomic diversity analysis revealed low average nucleotide identity and DNA‒DNA hybridization values (<84.7 and <28.9 %, respectively) with its closest relative. Growth occurred at 20–40 °C, pH 6.0–9.0 and with NaCl concentrations of 0.5–2.5 % (w/v). The main fatty acids of strain CDC141 were C, C 10-methyl, TBSA, C 6/C 7, C 9, C, C iso I/anteiso B and C. The polar lipid profile was dominated by diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylinositol mannoside, unidentified glycolipids, unidentified phospholipids and unidentified lipids. MK8 (H) and MK8 (H) were the major respiratory quinones. These characteristics were consistent with the typical chemotaxonomic properties of members of the genus . Based on the results of phenotypic and genetic analyses, strain CDC141 was identified as representing a new species of the genus , with the proposed name sp. nov. (CDC141=JCM 34955=GDMCC 4.207).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Natural Science Foundation for Young Scientists of Shanxi Province (Award 82073624)
    • Principle Award Recipient: ZhenjunLi
  • the National Key R&D Program of China (Award 2019YFC1200601-6)
    • Principle Award Recipient: ZhenjunLi
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005728
2023-04-06
2024-05-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Nocard E. Note sur la maladie des boeufs de la guadeloupe connue sous le nom de farcin. Ann L’Inst Pasteur 1888; 2:293–302
    [Google Scholar]
  2. McNeil MM, Brown JM. The medically important aerobic actinomycetes: epidemiology and microbiology. Clin Microbiol Rev 1994; 7:357–417 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barka EA, Vatsa P, Sanchez L, Gaveau-Vaillant N, Jacquard C et al. Taxonomy, physiology, and natural products of actinobacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2016; 80:1–43 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Goodfellow M, Lechevalier MP. Genus Nocardia Trevisan 1889, 9AL. In Williams ST, Sharpe ME, Holt JG. eds Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology vol 4 Baltimore: Williams &Wilkins; 1989 pp 2348–2361
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Xu S, Wei M, Li G, Li Z, Che Y et al. Comprehensive analysis of the Nocardia cyriacigeorgica complex reveals five species-level clades with different evolutionary and pathogenicity characteristics. mSystems 2022; 7:e0140621 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Conville PS, Brown-Elliott BA, Smith T, Zelazny AM. The complexities of Nocardia taxonomy and identification. J Clin Microbiol 2018; 56:e01419-17 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Saubolle MA, Sussland D. Nocardiosis: review of clinical and laboratory experience. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41:4497–4501 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kandi V. Human Nocardia infections: a review of pulmonary nocardiosis. Cureus 2015; 7:e304 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Rafiei N, Peri AM, Righi E, Harris P, Paterson DL. Central nervous system nocardiosis in Queensland: a report of 20 cases and review of the literature. Medicine 2016; 95:e5255 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Vernon-Parry KD. Scanning electron microscopy: an introduction. III-Vs Review 2000; 13:40–44 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Costilow RN, Nester EW, Wood WA et al. Manual of Methods for General Bacteriology American Society for Microbiology; 1981 pp 415–416
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics Wiley; 1991
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2068–2069 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Xu S, Wei M, Li G, Li Z, Che Y et al. Comprehensive analysis of the Nocardia cyriacigeorgica complex reveals five species-level clades with different evolutionary and pathogenicity characteristics. mSystems 2022; 7:e0140621 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:268–274 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:W293–W296 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Xu S, Li Z, Huang Y, Han L, Che Y et al. Whole genome sequencing reveals the genomic diversity, taxonomic classification, and evolutionary relationships of the genus Nocardia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2021; 15:e0009665 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Xu S, Che Y, Li Z, Huang Y, Han L et al. dapb1 gene used for taxonomic classification and species identification of Nocardia. Disease Surveillance 2022; 37:191–197
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Li Z, Lu X, Wang D, Liang WL, Zhang J et al. Genomic comparison of serogroups O159 and O170 with other Vibrio cholerae serogroups. BMC Genomics 2019; 20:241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:117–134 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu B, Zheng D, Jin Q, Chen L, Yang J. VFDB 2019: a comparative pathogenomic platform with an interactive web interface. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:D687–D692 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Alcock BP, Raphenya AR, Lau TTY, Tsang KK, Bouchard M et al. CARD 2020: antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res 2020; 48:D517–D525 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Mahfouz N, Ferreira I, Beisken S, von Haeseler A, Posch AE. Large-scale assessment of antimicrobial resistance marker databases for genetic phenotype prediction: a systematic review. J Antimicrob Chemother 2020; 75:3099–3108 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Nie G-X, Ming H, Li S, Zhou E-M, Cheng J et al. Amycolatopsis dongchuanensis sp. nov., an actinobacterium isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:2650–2656 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sasser M. Technical note 101: Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. MIDI; 1990
  32. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Collins MD, Pirouz T, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Distribution of menaquinones in actinomycetes and corynebacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1977; 100:221–230 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Collins MD, Jones D. A note on the separation of natural mixtures of bacterial ubiquinones using reverse-phase partition thin-layer chromatography and high performance liquid chromatography. J Appl Bacteriol 1981; 51:129–134 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Woods GL, Brown-Elliott BA, Conville PS, Desmond EP, Hall GS et al. Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacteria, Nocardiae, and Other Aerobic Actinomycetes, 2nd edn. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2011 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Benndorf R, Schwitalla JW, Martin K, de Beer ZW, Vollmers J et al. Nocardia macrotermitis sp. nov. and Nocardia aurantia sp. nov., isolated from the gut of the fungus-growing termite Macrotermes natalensis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5226–5234 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005728
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005728
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error