1887

Abstract

We isolated and analysed a Gram-negative, facultatively thermophilic, xylan-degrading bacterium that we designated as strain DA-C8. The strain was isolated from compost from Ishigaki Island, Japan, by enrichment culturing using beech wood xylan as the sole carbon source. The strain showed high xylan degradation ability under anaerobic growth conditions. The isolate grew at 37–60 °C (optimum, 55 °C) and pH 4.0–11.0 (optimum, pH 9.0). As well as xylan, strain DA-C8 could use polysaccharides such as arabinoxylan and galactan as carbon sources. Comparison of 16S rRNA gene sequences indicated that strain DA-C8 was most closely related to LC2-13A (93.9 %) and HSCC596 (93.5 %). In phylogenetic analysis, strain DA-C8 belonged to the same lineage as K13 (92.5 %), but there was less statistical support for branching (70 %). Digital DNA–DNA hybridization, average nucleotide identity values and average amino acid sequence identity between strain DA-C8 and LC2-13A were 21.8, 68.3 and 58.2 %, respectively. Those between strain DA-C8 and K13 were 23.7, 67.7 and 57.6 %, respectively. The whole-genome DNA G+C content of strain DA-C8 was 52.3 mol%. The major cellular fatty acids were C (42.9 %), anteiso-C (20.0 %) and anteiso-C (16.7 %), the major quinone was menaquinone 7, and the major polar lipids were unidentified glycolipids. On the basis of phenotypic, chemotaxonomic and phylogenetic evidence, a novel genus is proposed— gen. nov.—for the novel species sp. nov. The type strain is DA-C8 (=JCM 34211=DSM 111723).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Science and Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable Development (Award JPMJSA1801)
    • Principle Award Recipient: AkihikoKosugi
  • Exploratory Research for Advanced Technology (Award JPMJER1502)
    • Principle Award Recipient: AkihikoKosugi
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005724
2023-03-21
2024-05-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/73/3/ijsem005724.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005724&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Scheller HV, Ulvskov P. Hemicelluloses. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2010; 61:263–289 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Singh B. Alokika Production, characteristics, and biotechnological applications of microbial xylanases. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2019; 103:8763–8784 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Moreira LRS, Filho EXF. Insights into the mechanism of enzymatic hydrolysis of xylan. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2016; 100:5205–5214 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Biely P. Microbial xylanolytic systems. Trends Biotechnol 1985; 3:286–290 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Rivas R, Mateos PF, Martínez-Molina E, Velázquez E. Paenibacillus xylanilyticus sp. nov., an airborne xylanolytic bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:405–408 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Khianngam S, Akaracharanya A, Tanasupawat S, Lee KC, Lee JS. Paenibacillus thailandensis sp. nov. and Paenibacillus nanensis sp. nov., xylanase-producing bacteria isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:564–568 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kukolya J, Bata-Vidács I, Luzics S, Tóth E, Kéki Z et al. Xylanibacillus composti gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from compost. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:698–702 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ash C, Priest FG, Collins MD. Molecular identification of rRNA group 3 bacilli (Ash, Farrow, Wallbanks and Collins) using a PCR probe test. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 1994; 64:253–260 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Grady EN, MacDonald J, Liu L, Richman A, Yuan Z-C. Current knowledge and perspectives of Paenibacillus: a review. Microb Cell Fact 2016; 15: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Logan NA, Vos P. Endospore-forming soil bacteria. In Logan NA, Vos P. eds Paenibacillus, Nitrogen Fixation and Soil Fertility Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2011 pp 287–307 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ungkulpasvich U, Baramee S, Uke A, Kosugi A. Capillibacterium thermochitinicola gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel anaerobic thermophilic chitinolytic bacterium from compost. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 71: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chhe C, Uke A, Baramee S, Tachaapaikoon C, Pason P et al. Characterization of a thermophilic facultatively anaerobic bacterium Paenibacillus sp. strain DA-C8 that exhibits xylan degradation under anaerobic conditions. J Biotechnol 2021; 342:64–71 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hungate RE. Chapter IV A Roll Tube Method for Cultivation of Strict Anaerobes Methods Microbiol Academic Press; 1969 pp 117–132
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007; 23:2947–2948 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Yokota A, Ningsih F, Nurlaili DG, Sakai Y, Yabe S et al. Paenibacillus cisolokensis sp. nov., isolated from litter of a geyser. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:3088–3094 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Vaz-Moreira I, Figueira V, Lopes AR, Pukall R, Spröer C et al. Paenibacillus residui sp. nov., isolated from urban waste compost. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:2415–2419 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Goto K, Omura T, Hara Y, Sadaie Y. Application of the partial 16S rDNA sequence as an index for rapid identification of species in the genus Bacillus. J Gen Appl Microbiol 2000; 46:1–8 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kim D-U, Kim S-G, Lee H, Chun J, Cho J-C et al. Paenibacillus xanthinilyticus sp. nov., isolated from agricultural soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:2937–2942 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Mishra AK, Lagier J-C, Rivet R, Raoult D, Fournier P-E. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Paenibacillus senegalensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 7:70–81 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sukweenadhi J, Kim Y-J, Lee KJ, Koh S-C, Hoang V-A et al. Paenibacillus yonginensis sp. nov., a potential plant growth promoting bacterium isolated from humus soil of Yongin forest. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2014; 106:935–945 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Chhe C, Uke A, Baramee S, Ungkulpasvich U, Tachaapaikoon C et al. Draft genome sequence data of the facultative, thermophilic, xylanolytic bacterium Paenibacillus sp. strain DA-C8. Data Brief 2021; 35:106784 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Uke A, Chhe C, Baramee S, Tachaapaikoon C, Pason P et al. Draft genome sequence data of Paenibacillus cisolokensis strain LC2-13A and Xylanibacillus composti strain K-13. Data Brief 2021; 38:107361 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Towards a genome-based taxonomy for prokaryotes. J Bacteriol 2005; 187:6258–6264 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Luo C, Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. MyTaxa: an advanced taxonomic classifier for genomic and metagenomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:e73 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Beveridge TJ. Structures of Gram-negative cell walls and their derived membrane vesicles. J Bacteriol 1999; 181:4725–4733 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Minnikin DE, Collins MD, Goodfellow M. Fatty acid and polar lipid composition in the classification of Cellulomonas, Oerskovia and related taxa. J Appl Microbiol 1979; 47:87–95 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Komagata K, Suzuki K-I. 4 Lipid and cell-wall analysis in bacterial systematics. In Methods Microbiol Elsevier; 1988 pp 161–207
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Sasaki J, Chijimatsu M, Suzuki K. Taxonomic significance of 2,4-diaminobutyric acid isomers in the cell wall peptidoglycan of actinomycetes and reclassification of Clavibacter toxicus as Rathayibacter toxicus comb. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1998; 48 Pt 2:403–410 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol 1959; 37:911–917 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Tamaoka J. Analysis of bacterial menaquinone mixtures by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Methods Enzymol 1986; 123:251–256 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Logan NA, Berge O, Bishop AH, Busse H-J, De Vos P et al. Proposed minimal standards for describing new taxa of aerobic, endospore-forming bacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:2114–2121 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Shida O, Takagi H, Kadowaki K, Nakamura LK, Komagata K. Transfer of Bacillus alginolyticus, Bacillus chondroitinus, Bacillus curdlanolyticus, Bacillus glucanolyticus, Bacillus kobensis, and Bacillus thiaminolyticus to the genus Paenibacillus and emended description of the genus Paenibacillus. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:289–298 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Heyndrickx M, Vandemeulebroecke K, Scheldeman P, Kersters K, de Vos P et al. A polyphasic reassessment of the genus Paenibacillus, reclassification of Bacillus lautus (Nakamura 1984) as Paenibacillus lautus comb. nov. and of Bacillus peoriae (Montefusco et al. 1993) as Paenibacillus peoriae comb. nov., and emended descriptions of P. lautus and of P. peoriae. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1996; 46:988–1003 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005724
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005724
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error