1887

Abstract

A bacterial strain designated SC2-9 was isolated from the dust collector of a pigpen located in Wanju-gun, Jeollabuk-do, Republic of Korea. Cells were strictly aerobic, Gram-stain-negative, flagellated and rod-shaped. The strain was catalase- and oxidase-positive, and grew optimally 28–30 °C, pH 8.0 and 0 % NaCl (w/v). Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showed 99.1 and 98.3 % similarities to KBB12 and CY1, and revealing less than 97 % similarity to other validly named species. The genomic DNA G+C content of strain SC2-9 was 68.2 %. The orthologous average nucleotide identity and dDDH values of strain SC2-9 with the closest species KCTC 32230 were 85.6 and 29.3 %, respectively. The polar lipids were diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol, three unidentified aminolipids and one unidentified lipid. The major fatty acids (>10 %) were summed feature 3 (C 6 and/or C 7), C and summed feature 8 (C 6 and/ or C 7). The predominant isoprenoid quinone was ubiquinone-8. Based on phenotypic, chemotaxonomic and phylogenetic data, strain SC2-9 should be assigned as a novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is SC2-9 (=KACC 19310=NBRC 113103).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005701
2023-01-27
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Wang H, Li J, Hu A, Qin D, Xu H et al. Melaminivora alkalimesophila gen. nov., sp. nov., a melamine-degrading betaproteobacterium isolated from a melamine-producing factory. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:1938–1944
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Kim J-Y, Park S-H, Lee D-H, Song G, Kim Y-J. Melaminivora jejuensis sp. nov., isolated from swinery waste. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:9–13 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Vaz-Moreira I, Narciso-da-Rocha C, Lopes AR, Carvalho G, Lobo-da-Cunha A et al. Oryzisolibacter propanilivorax gen. nov., sp. nov., a propanil-degrading bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:3752–3758 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Heo J, Cho HY, Heo I, Hong SB, Kim JS et al. Pulveribacter suum gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from a pig farm dust collector. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:1864–1869
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Mechichi T, Stackebrandt E, Fuchs G. Alicycliphilus denitrificans gen. nov., sp. nov., a cyclohexanol-degrading, nitrate-reducing beta-proteobacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003; 53:147–152 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Yang S, Liu Y, Yang N, Lan Y, Lan W et al. The gut microbiome and antibiotic resistome of chronic diarrhea rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and its similarity to the human gut microbiome. Microbiome 2022; 10:29 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kim D-H, Yun H-S, Kim Y-S, Kim J-G. Effects of co-culture on improved productivity and bioresource for microalgal biomass using the floc-forming bacteria Melaminivora Jejuensis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2020; 8:588210 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. eds Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics New York: Wiley: 1991 pp 115–175
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 1971; 20:406 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP et al. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:6614–6624 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Na S-I, Kim YO, Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Baek I et al. UBCG: up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Microbiol 2018; 56:280–285 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ et al. The seed and the rapid annotation of microbial genomes using subsystems technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:D206–14 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park S-C, Chun J. OrthoANI: an improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1100–1103 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:117–134 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Towards a genome-based taxonomy for prokaryotes. J Bacteriol 2005; 187:6258–6264
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Alcock BP, Raphenya AR, Lau TTY, Tsang KK, Bouchard M et al. CARD 2020: antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res 2020D517–D525 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Smibert R, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization. In Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg N. eds Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994 pp 607–654
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Sasser M. Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids, MIDI Technical Note 101. Newark, DE, USA: Microbial ID Inc; 1990
  28. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005701
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005701
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error