Skip to content
1887

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY logo International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology

Volume 73, Issue 1

Description of gen. nov. sp. nov No Access

Abstract

During our previous study, strain NEAU-J3 was classified as representing a novel genus ‘’ within the family . Nevertheless, it is a great pity the name cannot be validated as the proposed genus name is illegitimate (Principle 2 of the ICNP). In this study, we describe as a novel genus within the family and a polyphasic approach was used to provide evidence to support the classification. The G+C content of the genomic DNA of the type strain is 71.6 %. Digital DNA–DNA hybridization and average nucleotide identity (ANI) values could be used to differentiate NEAU-J3 from its related type strains. The phenotypic, genetic and chemotaxonomic data also indicated that NEAU-J3 occupies a branch separated from those of known genera in the family . Therefore, NEAU-J3 represents a novel species of a novel genus in the family , for which the name gen. nov., sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain of is NEAU-J3 (= CGMCC 4.7039 = DSM 45747).

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): Jidongwangia harbinensis gen. nov. sp. nov. , micromonosporaceae , polyphasic approach and whole genome
Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • The Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award 32030090)
    • Principle Award Recipient: WenshengXiang
© 2023 The Authors
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005670
2023-01-04
2025-03-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Krasil’nikov NA. Ray fungi and related organisms Actinomycetales. Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR 1938
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Goodfellow M, Stanton LJ, Simpson KE, Minnikin DE. Numerical and chemical classification of Actinoplanes and some related actinomycetes. Journal of General Microbiology 1990; 136:19–36 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Koch C, Kroppenstedt RM, Rainey FA, Stackebrandt E. 16S ribosomal DNA analysis of the genera Micromonospora, Actinoplanes, Catellatospora, Catenuloplanes, Couchioplanes, Dactylosporangium, and Pilimelia and emendation of the family Micromonosporaceae. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1996; 46:765–768 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Stackebrandt E, Rainey FA, Ward-rainey NL. Proposal for a new hierarchic classification system, Actinobacteria classis nov. Int J Bacteriol 1997; 47:479–491 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhi XY, Li WJ, Stackebrandt E. An update of the structure and 16S rRNA gene sequence-based definition of higher ranks of the class Actinobacteria, with the proposal of two new suborders and four new families and emended descriptions of the existing higher taxa. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:589–608 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Jia F, Liu C, Wang X, Zhao J, Liu Q et al. Wangella harbinensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the family Micromonosporaceae. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2013; 103:399–408 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Schornikov EI. Ostracodes of the family Bythocytheridae of the boundary layers of the Devonian–Carboniferous in northeast Russia. Russische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wladiwostok 1993:1–86
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22:4673–4680 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Systematic Zoology 1971; 20:406 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Tamura K, Nei M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol 1993; 10:512–526 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Mahmoud H, Jose L, Eapen S. Grimontia sedimenti sp. nov., isolated from benthic sediments near coral reefs south of Kuwait. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 71: [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: A taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Chen XY, Zhou YK, Zheng FC. Comparison of two extracting methods for soil microbial total. DNA.Chin J Trop Agric 2008; 28:341–43
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Li R, Zhu H, Ruan J, Qian W, Fang X et al. De novo assembly of human genomes with massively parallel short read sequencing. Genome Res 2010; 20:265–272 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Li R, Li Y, Kristiansen K, Wang J. SOAP: short oligonucleotide alignment program. Bioinformatics 2008; 24:713–714 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Wayne LG, Brenner DJ, Colwell RR, Grimont PAD, Kandler O et al. International committee on systematic bacteriology. report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1987; 37:463–464 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Chun J, Rainey FA. Integrating genomics into the taxonomy and systematics of the Bacteria and Archaea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:316–324 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Han C, Jiang MQ, Shan QQ, Liu T et al. Nucisporomicrobium flavum gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the family micromonosporaceae isolated from saline–alkali soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Phongsopitanun W, Matsumoto A, Inahashi Y, Kudo T, Mori M et al. Actinoplanes lichenis sp. nov., isolated from lichen. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:468–473 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Tamura T, Nakagaito Y, Nishii T, Hasegawa T, Stackebrandt E et al. A new genus of the order Actinomycetales, Couchioplanes gen. nov., with descriptions of Couchioplanes caeruleus (Horan and Brodsky 1986) comb. nov. and Couchioplanes caeruleus subsp. azureus subsp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1994; 44:193–203 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Ara I, Matsumoto A, Bakir MA, Kudo T, Omura S et al. Pseudosporangium ferrugineum gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the family Micromonosporaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:1644–1652 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Ara I, Kudo T. Krasilnikovia gen. nov., a new member of the family Micromonosporaceae and description of Krasilnikovia cinnamonea sp. nov. Actinomycetologica 2007; 21:1–10 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005670
Loading
Description of Jidongwangia harbinensis gen. nov. sp. nov
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 73, 005670 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.005670
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005670
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005670
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error