1887

Abstract

A Gram-negative, non-motile, aerobic bacterium, named 02-257, was isolated from Antarctic soil. The cells are surrounded by relatively thin capsules and were catalase-positive and oxidase-negative cocci. Growth of strain 02-257 was observed at 4–35 °C (optimum, 28–30 °C), pH 6.0–8.0 (optimum, pH 6.0) and with 0–1.5% NaCl (optimum, 0 %). Strain 02–257 showed the highest 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity to Seoho-28 (95.06 %). Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences indicated that strain 02-257 is a member of a novel species belonging to the clade formed by members of the genus in the family . The DNA G+C content was 72.9 mol%. Strain 02-257 contained C-iso (23.0 %), C 9 (13.8 %), C (12.5 %) and C 9-iso (10.8 %) as major cellular fatty acids and menaquinone MK-7(H) was detected as the only isoprenoid quinone. Diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylinositole mannoside, phosphatidylinositole dimannoside, unidentified phosphoglycolipid, unidentified aminophospholipid, two unidentified phospholipids, three unidentified aminolipids and six unidentified lipids were the major polar lipids. -Diaminopimelic acids were the diagnostic diamino acids in the cell-wall peptidoglycan. On the basis of phenotypic, chemotaxonomic and phylogenetic data, strain 02-257 is considered to represent a novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is 02-257 (=CCTCC AB 2021030=KCTC 49619).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Chinese Polar Scientific Strategy Research Fund (Award IC201706)
    • Principle Award Recipient: FangPeng
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award 42076230)
    • Principle Award Recipient: FangPeng
  • R&D Infrastructure and Facility Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (Award NIMR-2022-8)
    • Principle Award Recipient: FangPeng
  • National Science and Technology Fundamental Resources Investigation Program of China (Award 2021FY100900)
    • Principle Award Recipient: FangPeng
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005647
2022-12-16
2024-05-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Salam N, Jiao J-Y, Zhang X-T, Li W-J. Update on the classification of higher ranks in the phylum Actinobacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:1331–1355 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chun S-J, Cui Y, Jin C, Cho AR, Wong S-K et al. Paraconexibacter algicola gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel actinobacterium isolated from a eutrophic lake during the end of cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms, and proposal of Paraconexibacteraceae fam. nov. in the order Solirubrobacterales. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:915–922 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Reddy GSN, Garcia-Pichel F. Description of Patulibacter americanus sp. nov., isolated from biological soil crusts, emended description of the genus Patulibacter Takahashi et al. 2006 and proposal of Solirubrobacterales ord. nov. and Thermoleophilales ord. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:87–94 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Takahashi Y, Matsumoto A, Morisaki K, Ōmura S. Patulibacter minatonensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel actinobacterium isolated using an agar medium supplemented with superoxide dismutase, and proposal of Patulibacteraceae fam. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:401–406 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Foesel BU, Geppert A, Rohde M, Overmann J. Parviterribacter kavangonensis gen. nov., sp. nov. and Parviterribacter multiflagellatus sp. nov., novel members of Parviterribacteraceae fam. nov. within the order Solirubrobacterales, and emended descriptions of the classes Thermoleophilia and Rubrobacteria and their orders and families. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:652–665 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhi X-Y, Li W-J, Stackebrandt E. An update of the structure and 16S rRNA gene sequence-based definition of higher ranks of the class Actinobacteria, with the proposal of two new suborders and four new families and emended descriptions of the existing higher taxa. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:589–608 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Seki T, Matsumoto A, Ōmura S, Takahashi Y. Distribution and isolation of strains belonging to the order Solirubrobacterales. J Antibiot 2015; 68:763–766 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd edn. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 1989
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. eds Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics Chichester Chichester: Wiley; 1991 pp 115–175
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lin Y-C, Uemori K, de Briel DA, Arunpairojana V, Yokota A. Zimmermannella helvola gen. nov., sp. nov., Zimmermannella alba sp. nov., Zimmermannella bifida sp. nov., Zimmermannella faecalis sp. nov. and Leucobacter albus sp. nov., novel members of the family Microbacteriaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:1669–1676 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:4876–4882 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 1999; 41:95–98
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Systematic Zoology 1971; 20:406 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gou J-J, Na L, Guo L-H et al. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter hormaechei ST1103 with IMP-26 carbapenemase and ESBL gene bla shv-178. Infect Drug Resist 2020; 13:597–605 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Chin C-S, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J et al. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Methods 2013; 10:563–569 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Chin C-S, Peluso P, Sedlazeck FJ, Nattestad M, Concepcion GT et al. Phased diploid genome assembly with single-molecule real-time sequencing. Nat Methods 2016; 13:1050–1054 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T et al. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 2008; 9:75 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Zuo G, Hao B. CVTree3 web server for whole-genome-based and alignment-free prokaryotic phylogeny and taxonomy. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 2015; 13:321–331 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Doetsch RN. Determinative methods of light microscopy. In Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Costilow RN, Nester EW, Wood WA et al. eds Manual of Methods for General Bacteriology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1981 pp 21–33
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Murray RGE, Doetsch RN, Robinow CF. Determinative and cytological light microscopy. In Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR. eds Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994 pp 21–41
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Bowman JP. Description of Cellulophaga algicola sp. nov., isolated from the surfaces of Antarctic algae, and reclassification of Cytophaga uliginosa (ZoBell and Upham 1944) Reichenbach 1989 as Cellulophaga uliginosa comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50 Pt 5:1861–1868 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Xu P, Li W-J, Tang S-K, Zhang Y-Q, Chen G-Z et al. Naxibacter alkalitolerans gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel member of the family “Oxalobacteraceae” isolated from China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:1149–1153 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kovacs N. Identification of Pseudomonas pyocyanea by the oxidase reaction. Nature 1956; 178:703 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Cowan ST, Steel KJ. Manual for the Identification of Medical Bacteria London: Cambridge University Press; 1965
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Niharika N, Jindal S, Kaur J, Lal R. Sphingomonas indica sp. nov., isolated from hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH)-contaminated soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:2997–3002 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Sasser M. Technical Note 101: Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids MIDI; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Tindall BJ. Lipid composition of Halobacterium lacusprofundi. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1990; 66:199–202
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Collins MD, Pirouz T, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Distribution of menaquinones in actinomycetes and corynebacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1977; 100:221–230 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Xie CH, Yokota A. Phylogenetic analyses of Lampropedia hyalina based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence. J Gen Appl Microbiol 2003; 49:345–349 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Schleifer KH, Kandler O. Peptidoglycan types of bacterial cell walls and their taxonomic implications. Bacteriol Rev 1972; 36:407–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Seki T, Matsumoto A, Shimada R, Inahashi Y, Ōmura S et al. Conexibacter arvalis sp. nov., isolated from a cultivated field soil sample. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:2400–2404 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. An D-S, Wang L, Kim MS, Bae H-M, Lee S-T et al. Solirubrobacter ginsenosidimutans sp. nov., isolated from soil of a ginseng field. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:2606–2609 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. An D-S, Siddiqi MZ, Kim K-H, Yu H-S, Im W-T. Baekduia soli gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel bacterium isolated from the soil of Baekdu Mountain and proposal of a novel family name, Baekduiaceae fam. nov. J Microbiol 2018; 56:24–29 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Monciardini P, Cavaletti L, Schumann P, Rohde M, Donadio S. Conexibacter woesei gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel representative of a deep evolutionary line of descent within the class Actinobacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003; 53:569–576 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Singleton DR, Furlong MA, Peacock AD, White DC, Coleman DC et al. Solirubrobacter pauli gen. nov., sp. nov., a mesophilic bacterium within the Rubrobacteridae related to common soil clones. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003; 53:485–490 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005647
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005647
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error