1887

Abstract

The taxonomic position of a novel actinomycete, designated strain RS10V-4, was determined using a polyphasic approach. Strain RS10V-4 was isolated from paddy rhizosphere soil of rice plant ( L.). The morphological, physiological and chemotaxonomic properties were consistent with its classification in the genus . On the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, strain RS10V-4 belongs to the genus and had the highest sequence similarity to NBRC 15452 (98.3 %). The G+C content of the genomic DNA was 73.8 %. Digital DNA–DNA hybridization and average nucleotide identity values between the genome sequences of strain RS10V-4 and ATCC 11455 were lower than the recommendation threshold values for the recognition of species within the same genus. The whole-cell hydrolysates of strain RS10V-4 contained diaminopimelic acid as the diagnostic diamino acid and the whole-cell sugars were glucose and ribose. The predominant menaquinones were MK-9(H) and MK-9(H). The predominant cellular fatty acids (>10 %) were iso-C, anteiso-C, iso-C and iso-C. The polar lipids of strain RS10V-4 contained diphosphatidylglycerol, hydroxyphosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylinositol, an unidentified aminolipid, two unidentified lipids and an unidentified phospholipid. On the basis of these phenotypic and genotypic characteristics, it is supported that strain RS10V-4 represents a novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is RS10V-4 (=TBRC 15167=NBRC 115345). In addition, the comparison of the whole genome sequences and phenotypic features suggested that and belong to the same species. Therefore, it is proposed that is reclassified as a later heterotypic synonym of .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005639
2023-01-18
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Waksman SA, Henrici AT. The nomenclature and classification of the actinomycetes. J Bacteriol 1943; 46:337–341 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Nouioui I, Carro L, García-López M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Woyke T et al. Genome-based taxonomic classification of the phylum Based Taxonomic Classification of the Phylum Actinobacteria. Front Microbiol 2018; 9:2007 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Yagüe P, López-García MT, Rioseras B, Sánchez J, Manteca A. Pre-sporulation stages of Streptomyces differentiation: state-of-the-art and future perspectives. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2013; 342:79–88 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lechevalier MP, Lechevalier H. Chemical composition as a criterion in the classification of aerobic actinomycetes. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1970; 20:435–443 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Goodfellow M, Parte A, Whitman WB, Kämpfer P, Busse H-J. Genus I. Streptomyces Waksman and Henrici 1943, 339 emend Witt and Stackebrandt emend. Wellington, Stackebrandt, Sanders, Wolstrup and Jorgensen 1992, 159. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Part B vol 5 Springer; 2012 pp 370–1767
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Katz L, Baltz RH. Natural product discovery: past, present, and future. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2016; 43:155–176 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. De Simeis D, Serra S. Actinomycetes: a never-ending source of bioactive compounds—an overview on antibiotics production. Antibiotics 2021; 10:483 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Sørensen J. The rhizosphere as a habitat for soil microorganisms. Modern Soil Microbiol 1997; 21–45:
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Rovira AD. Interactions between plant roots and soil microorganisms. Annu Rev Microbiol 1965; 19:241–266 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Xue L, Xue Q, Chen Q, Lin C, Shen G et al. Isolation and evaluation of rhizosphere actinomycetes with potential application for biocontrol of Verticillium wilt of cotton. Crop Protection 2013; 43:231–240 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kuester E, Williams ST. Selection of media for isolation of streptomycetes. Nature 1964; 202:928–929 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Shirling EB, Gottlieb D. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1966; 16:313–340 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kieser T, Bibb MJ, Buttner MJ, Chater KF, Hopwood DA. Practical Streptomyces Genetics John Innes Foundation Norwich; 2000
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Mingma R, Pathom-aree W, Trakulnaleamsai S, Thamchaipenet A, Duangmal K. Isolation of rhizospheric and roots endophytic actinomycetes from Leguminosae plant and their activities to inhibit soybean pathogen, Xanthomonas campestris pv. glycine. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2014; 30:271–280 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 2013; 29:1072–1075 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP et al. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:6614–6624 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee I, Chalita M, Ha S-M, Na S-I, Yoon S-H et al. ContEst16S: an algorithm that identifies contaminated prokaryotic genomes using 16S RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2053–2057 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol 2021; 38:3022–3027 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Biol 1971; 20:406–416 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Tamura K. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions when there are strong transition-transversion and G+C-content biases. Mol Biol Evol 1992; 9:678–687 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:1–10 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:1–14 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:929–931 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Blin K, Shaw S, Kloosterman AM, Charlop-Powers Z, van Wezel GP et al. AntiSMASH 6.0: improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:W29–W35
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Harrison J, Studholme DJ. Recently published Streptomyces genome sequences. Microb Biotechnol 2014; 7:373–380
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Lippert K, Galinski EA. Enzyme stabilization be ectoine-type compatible solutes: protection against heating, freezing and drying. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1992; 37:61–65 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Yamanaka K, Oikawa H, Ogawa H-O, Hosono K, Shinmachi F et al. Desferrioxamine E produced by Streptomyces griseus stimulates growth and development of Streptomyces tanashiensis. Microbiology 2005; 151:2899–2905
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Tokala RK, Strap JL, Jung CM, Crawford DL, Salove MH et al. Novel plant-microbe rhizosphere interaction involving Streptomyces lydicus WYEC108 and the pea plant (Pisum sativum). Appl Environ Microbiol 2002; 68:2161–2171 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Jones KL. Fresh isolates of actinomycetes in which the presence of sporogenous aerial mycelia is a fluctuating characteristic. J Bacteriol 1949; 57:141–145 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Luedemann GM. Micromonospora purpureochromogenes (Waksman and Curtis 1916) comb. nov. (subjective synonym: Micromonospora fusca Jensen 1932). Int J Syst Bacteriol 1971; 21:240–247 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Mundie D. The NBS/ISCC Color System Pittsburgh, PA: Polymath Systems; 1995 p 5356
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Gordon RE, Barnett DA, Handerhan JE, Pang C-N. Nocardia coeliaca, Nocardia autotrophica, and the nocardin strain. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1974; 24:54–63 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Williams ST, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Wellington EM, Sneath PH et al. Numerical classification of Streptomyces and related genera. J Gen Microbiol 1983; 129:1743–1813 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Gordon RE, Mihm JM. A comparative study of some strains received as nocardiae. J Bacteriol 1957; 73:15–27 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Becker B, Lechevalier MP, Lechevalier HA. Chemical composition of cell-wall preparations from strains of various form-genera of aerobic actinomycetes. Appl Microbiol 1965; 13:236–243 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Hasegawa T, Takizawa M, Tanida S. A rapid analysis for chemical grouping of aerobic actinomycetes. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1983; 29:319–322 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Staneck JL, Roberts GD. Simplified approach to identification of aerobic actinomycetes by thin-layer chromatography. Appl Microbiol 1974; 28:226–231 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Tomiyasu I. Mycolic acid composition and thermally adaptative changes in Nocardia asteroides. J Bacteriol 1982; 151:828–837 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Minnikin DE, Patel PV, Alshamaony L, Goodfellow M. Polar lipid composition in the classification of Nocardia and related bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1977; 27:104–117 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Collins MD, Pirouz T, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Distribution of menaquinones in actinomycetes and corynebacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1977; 100:221–230 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Sasser M. Technical Note 101: Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids Newark, DE: MIDI, Inc; 1990 pp 1–7
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005639
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005639
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error