Succinivibrio faecicola sp. nov., isolated from cow faeces

References

1. Bryant MP, Small N. Characteristics of two new genera of anaerobic curved rods isolated from the rumen of cattle. J Bacteriol 1956; 72:22–26 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
2. Indugu N, Vecchiarelli B, Baker LD, Ferguson JD, Vanamala JKP et al. Comparison of rumen bacterial communities in dairy herds of different production. BMC Microbiol 2017; 17:190 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
3. Xue M, Sun H, Wu X, Guan LL, Liu J. Assessment of rumen microbiota from a large dairy cattle cohort reveals the pan and core bacteriomes contributing to varied phenotypes. Appl Environ Microbiol 2018; 84:19 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
4. Pope PB, Smith W, Denman SE, Tringe SG, Barry K et al. Isolation of Succinivibrionaceae implicated in low methane emissions from Tammar wallabies. Science 2011; 333:646–648 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
5. Danielsson R, Dicksved J, Sun L, Gonda H, Müller B et al. Methane production in dairy cows correlates with rumen methanogenic and bacterial community structure. Front Microbiol 2017; 8:226 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bryant MPJB. Bacteria. Succinivibrio 20151–3 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
7. Mills E, O’Neill LAJ. Succinate: a metabolic signal in inflammation. Trends Cell Biol 2014; 24:313–320 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
8. Keiran N, Ceperuelo-Mallafré V, Calvo E, Hernández-Alvarez MI, Ejarque M et al. SUCNR1 controls an anti-inflammatory program in macrophages to regulate the metabolic response to obesity. Nat Immunol 2019; 20:581–592 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
9. De Vadder F, Kovatcheva-Datchary P, Zitoun C, Duchampt A, Bäckhed F et al. Microbiota-produced succinate improves glucose homeostasis via itestinal Gluconeogenesis. Cell Metab 2016; 24:151–157 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
10. Lee I, Chalita M, Ha S-M, Na S-I, Yoon S-H et al. ContEst16S: an algorithm that identifies contaminated prokaryotic genomes using 16S RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2053–2057 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
11. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
12. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:4876–4882 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
13. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
14. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
15. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
16. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
17. Fitch W. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Biol 1971; 20:406–416 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
18. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
19. Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park SC, Chun J. OrthoANI: an improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1100–1103 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
20. Suslow TV. Application of a rapid method for gram differentiation of plant pathogenic and saprophytic bacteria without staining. Phytopathology 1982; 72:917 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
21. Schaeffer AB, Fulton MD. A simplified method of staining endospores. Science 1933; 77:194 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
22. Schleifer KH, Kandler O. Peptidoglycan types of bacterial cell walls and their taxonomic implications. Bacteriol Rev 1972; 36:407–477 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
23. Becker B, Lechevalier MP, Gordon RE, Lechevalier HA. Rapid differentiation between Nocardia and Streptomyces by paper chromatography of whole-cell hydrolysates. Appl Microbiol 1964; 12:421–423 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
24. Minnikin DE, Patel PV, Alshamaony L, Goodfellow M. Polar lipid composition in the classification of nocardia and related bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1977; 27:104–117 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
25. Davis CP, Cleven D, Brown J, Balish E. Anaerobiospirillum, a new genus of spiral-shaped bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1976; 26:498–504 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
26. Malnick H, Microbiology E. Anaerobiospirillum thomasii sp. nov., an anaerobic spiral bacterium isolated from the feces of cats and dogs and from diarrheal feces of humans, and emendation of the genus Anaerobiospirillum. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:381–384 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
27. Morotomi M, Nagai F, Watanabe Y, Tanaka R. Succinatimonas hippei gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from human faeces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:1788–1793 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]