1887

Abstract

Two strictly anaerobic, Gram-stain-positive, non-motile bacteria (strains OPF53 and TOC12) were isolated from mouse intestines. Strains OPF53 and TOC12 grew at pH 5.5–9.0 and 5.0–9.0, respectively, and at temperatures of 30–45 °C. The cell morphologies of these strains were short rods and rods, respectively, and the cells possessed intracellular granules. The major cellular fatty acids of OPF53 were C 9 and C 9 dimethyl acetal, whereas those of TOC12 were C and C 9. In OPF53, the main end-products of modified peptone–yeast extract–glucose (PYG) fermentation were lactate, formate and butyrate, whereas, in addition to these acids, TOC12 also produced hydrogen. The genomes of OPF53 and TOC12 were respectively 2.2 and 2.0 Mbp in size with a DNA G+C contents of 69.1 and 58.7 %. The 16S rRNA gene sequences of OPF53 and TOC12 showed the highest similarity to members of the family , namely, Marseille-P2936 (94.3 %) and KCTC 15140 (93.2 %), respectively. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that both isolates formed distinct lineages from other genera of the family . In addition, the two strains were characterized by relatively low 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity (93.4 %) and can be distinguished by their distinctive traits (including cell shape, DNA G+C content, and major fatty acids profiles). On the basis of their polyphasic taxonomic properties, these isolates represent two noel species of two novel genera within the family , for which the names gen. nov., sp. nov. (OPF53=JCM 35015=KCTC 25474) and gen. nov., sp. nov. (TOC12=JCM 35017=KCTC 25472) are proposed.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (Award JP20gm1010006)
    • Principle Award Recipient: AtsushiToyoda
  • Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (Award JP18gm6010019)
    • Principle Award Recipient: HideyukiTamaki
  • Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science (Award 21J01569)
    • Principle Award Recipient: KanaMorinaga
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (Award 20K15441)
    • Principle Award Recipient: KanaMorinaga
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005596
2022-10-26
2024-05-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Gupta RS, Chen WJ, Adeolu M, Chai Y. Molecular signatures for the class Coriobacteriia and its different clades; proposal for division of the class Coriobacteriia into the emended order Coriobacteriales, containing the emended family Coriobacteriaceae and Atopobiaceae fam. nov., and Eggerthellales ord. nov., containing the family Eggerthellaceae fam. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:3379–3397 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Nouioui I, Carro L, García-López M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Woyke T et al. Genome-based taxonomic classification of the phylum Actinobacteria. Front Microbiol 2018; 9:2007 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Collins MD, Wallbanks S. Comparative sequence analyses of the 16S rRNA genes of Lactobacillus minutus, Lactobacillus rimae and Streptococcus parvulus: proposal for the creation of a new genus Atopobium. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1992; 74:235–240 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Li X, Jensen RL, Højberg O, Canibe N, Jensen BB. Olsenella scatoligenes sp. nov., a 3-methylindole- (skatole) and 4-methylphenol- (p-cresol) producing bacterium isolated from pig faeces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:1227–1233 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bailey GD, Love DN. Eubacterium fossor sp. nov., an agar-corroding organism from normal pharynx and oral and respiratory tract lesions of horses. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1986; 36:383–387 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Olsen I, Johnson JL, Moore LVH, Moore WEC. Lactobacillus uli sp. nov. and Lactobacillus rimae sp. nov. from the human gingival crevice and emended descriptions of Lactobacillus minutus and Streptococcus parvulus. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1991; 41:261–266 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sakamoto M, Iino T, Hamada M, Ohkuma M. Parolsenella catena gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from human faeces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:1165–1172 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Zgheib R, Anani H, Meng MM, Mailhe M, Ricaboni D et al. New human-associated species of the family Atopobiaceae and proposal to reclassify members of the genus Olsenella. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cools P, Oyaert M, Vaneechoutte M, De Laere E, Vervaeke S. Atopobium deltae sp. nov., isolated from the blood of a patient with Fournier’s gangrene. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:3140–3145 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Jin LZ, Ho YW, Ali MA, Abdullah N, Jalaludin S. Effect of adherent Lactobacillus spp. on in vitro adherence of salmonellae to the intestinal epithelial cells of chicken. J Appl Bacteriol 1996; 81:201–206 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hudault S, Liévin V, Bernet-Camard MF, Servin AL. Antagonistic activity exerted in vitro and in vivo by Lactobacillus casei (strain GG) against Salmonella typhimurium C5 infection. Appl Environ Microbiol 1997; 63:513–518 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Morita N, Umemoto E, Fujita S, Hayashi A, Kikuta J et al. GPR31-dependent dendrite protrusion of intestinal CX3CR1+ cells by bacterial metabolites. Nature 2019; 566:110–114 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Asai A, Nagao M, Hayakawa K, Miyazawa T, Sugihara H et al. Leptin production capacity determines food intake and susceptibility to obesity-induced diabetes in Oikawa–Nagao diabetes-prone and diabetes-resistant mice. Diabetologia 2020; 63:1836–1846 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Nagao M, Esguerra JLS, Wendt A, Asai A, Sugihara H et al. Selectively bred diabetes models: GK rats, NSY mice, and ON mice. Methods Mol Biol 2020; 2128:25–54 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hirayama I, Yi Z, Izumi S, Arai I, Suzuki W et al. Genetic analysis of obese diabetes in the TSOD mouse. Diabetes 1999; 48:1183–1191 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Nakamura K, Tamaki H, Kang MS, Mochimaru H, Lee S-T et al. A six-well plate method: less laborious and effective method for cultivation of obligate anaerobic microorganisms. Microbes Environ 2011; 26:301–306 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Moore ERB, Arnscheidt A, Krüger A, Strömpl C, Mau M. Simplified protocols for the preparation of genomic DNA from bacterial cultures. In Akkermans ADL, van Elsas JD, de Bruijn FJ. eds Molecular Microbial Ecology Manual, 1.6.1. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 1999 pp 1–15
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Chin C-S, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J et al. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Methods 2013; 10:563–569 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Chin C-S, Peluso P, Sedlazeck FJ, Nattestad M, Concepcion GT et al. Phased diploid genome assembly with single-molecule real-time sequencing. Nat Methods 2016; 13:1050–1054 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin K, Miller JR, Bergman NH et al. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res 2017; 27:722–736 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 2014; 9:e112963 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. Bypassing cultivation to identify bacterial species. Microbe Magazine 2014; 9:111–118 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D801–D807 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Tanizawa Y, Fujisawa T, Nakamura Y. DFAST: a flexible prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline for faster genome publication. Bioinformatics 2018; 34:1037–1039 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Sakamoto S, Nobu MK, Mayumi D, Tamazawa S, Kusada H et al. Koleobacter methoxysyntrophicus gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel anaerobic bacterium isolated from deep subsurface oil field and proposal of Koleobacteraceae fam. nov. and Koleobacterales ord. nov. within the class Clostridia of the phylum Firmicutes. Syst Appl Microbiol 2021; 44:126154 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Yutin N, Puigbò P, Koonin EV, Wolf YI. Phylogenomics of prokaryotic ribosomal proteins. PLoS One 2012; 7:e36972 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:772–780 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:1972–1973 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Guindon S, Gascuel O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 2003; 52:696–704 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lemoine F, Domelevo Entfellner J-B, Wilkinson E, Correia D, Dávila Felipe M et al. Renewing Felsenstein’s phylogenetic bootstrap in the era of big data. Nature 2018; 556:452–456 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Digital DNA–DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:117–134 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Barrow GI, Feltham RKA. Cowan and Steel’s Manual for the Identification of Medical Bacteria, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Bilen M, Cadoret F, Richez M, Tomei E, Daoud Z et al. Libanicoccus massiliensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a new bacterium isolated from human stool. New Microbes New Infect 2018; 21:63–71 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Sakamoto M, Ikeyama N, Murakami T, Mori H, Yuki M et al. Comparative genomics of Parolsenella catena and Libanicoccus massiliensis: reclassification of Libanicoccus massiliensis as Parolsenella massiliensis comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:1123–1129 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Kraatz M, Wallace RJ, Svensson L. Olsenella umbonata sp. nov., a microaerotolerant anaerobic lactic acid bacterium from the sheep rumen and pig jejunum, and emended descriptions of Olsenella, Olsenella uli and Olsenella profusa. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:795–803 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Han K-I, Lee KC, Eom MK, Kim J-S, Suh MK et al. Olsenella faecalis sp. nov., an anaerobic actinobacterium isolated from human faeces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:2323–2328 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005596
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005596
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error