Mycolicibacterium aurantiacum sp. nov. and Mycolicibacterium xanthum sp. nov., two novel actinobacteria isolated from mangrove sediments

References

1. Gupta RS, Lo B, Son J. Phylogenomics and comparative genomic studies robustly support division of the genus Mycobacterium into an emended genus Mycobacterium and four novel genera. Front Microbiol 2018; 9:67:67 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
2. Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5607–5612 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
3. Augelletti F, Tremblay J, Agathos SN, Jousset A, Stenuit B. Draft whole-genome sequence of the anthracene-degrading strain Mycolicibacterium frederiksbergense LB501^T, isolated from a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. Microbiol Resour Announc 2020; 9:671–620 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
4. Yang J, Gu Y, Chen Z, Song Y, Sun F et al. Colonization and performance of a pyrene-degrading bacterium Mycolicibacterium sp. Pyr9 on root surfaces of white clover. Chemosphere 2021; 263:127918 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
5. Steliga T, Wojtowicz K, Kapusta P, Brzeszcz J. Assessment of biodegradation efficiency of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) in soil using three individual bacterial strains and their mixed culture. Molecules 2020; 25:25 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
6. Laothamteep N, Naloka K, Pinyakong O. Bioaugmentation with zeolite-immobilized bacterial consortium OPK results in a bacterial community shift and enhances the bioremediation of crude oil-polluted marine sandy soil microcosms. Environ Pollut 2022; 292:118309 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
7. Naloka K, Polrit D, Muangchinda C, Thoetkiattikul H, Pinyakong O. Bioballs carrying a syntrophic Rhodococcus and Mycolicibacterium consortium for simultaneous sorption and biodegradation of fuel oil in contaminated freshwater. Chemosphere 2021; 282:130973 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
8. Miethling R, Karlson U. Accelerated mineralization of pentachlorophenol in soil upon inoculation with Mycobacterium chlorophenolicum PCP1 and Sphingomonas chlorophenolica RA2. Appl Environ Microbiol 1996; 62:4361–4366 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
9. Le NB, Coleman NV. Biodegradation of vinyl chloride, cis-dichloroethene and 1,2-dichloroethane in the alkene/alkane-oxidising Mycobacterium strain NBB4. Biodegradation 2011; 22:1095–1108 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
10. Masuda T, Itoh K, Higashitsuji H, Higashitsuji H, Nakazawa N et al. Cold-inducible RNA-binding protein (Cirp) interacts with Dyrk1b/Mirk and promotes proliferation of immature male germ cells in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2012; 109:10885–10890 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
11. Jain A, Jain R, Jain S. Motility testing – hanging drop method and stab. In Jain A, Jain R, Jain S. eds Basic Techniques in Biochemistry, Microbiology and Molecular Biology: Principles and Techniques New York, NY: Springer US; 2020 pp 121–122
    [Google Scholar]
12. Sasser MJ. Bacterial identification by gas chromatographic analysis of fatty acid methyl esters GC-FAME MIDI Technical Note; 2006
    [Google Scholar]
13. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
14. Jaimes JR, Giraldo-Chavez J, Huyhua-Flores Y, Caceres-Nakiche T. Mycobacteria identification in solid culture by inverted phase microscopy and Ziehl-Neelsen stain. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica 2018; 35:279–284 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
15. Alcolea-Medina A, Fernandez MTC, Montiel N, García MPL, Sevilla CD et al. An improved simple method for the identification of Mycobacteria by MALDI-TOF MS (matrix-assisted laser desorption- ionization mass spectrometry). Sci Rep 2019; 9:20216 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
16. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
17. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22:4673–4680 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
19. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
20. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 1971; 20:406 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
22. Nei M, Kumar S. Molecular evolution and phylogenetics New York: Oxford University Press; 2000
    [Google Scholar]
23. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
24. Luo R, Liu B, Xie Y, Li Z, Huang W et al. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience 2012; 1:18 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
25. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
26. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
27. Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. Bypassing cultivation to identify bacterial species: culture-independent genomic approaches identify credibly distinct clusters, avoid cultivation bias, and provide true insights into microbial species. Microbe Magazine 2014; 9:111–118
    [Google Scholar]
28. Qin Q-L, Xie B-B, Zhang X-Y, Chen X-L, Zhou B-C et al. A proposed genus boundary for the prokaryotes based on genomic insights. J Bacteriol 2014; 196:2210–2215 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
29. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
30. Chaudhari NM, Gupta VK, Dutta C. BPGA- an ultra-fast pan-genome analysis pipeline. Sci Rep 2016; 6:24373 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
31. Chaumeil PA, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics 2019; 36:1925–1927 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
32. Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:268–274 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
33. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
34. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
35. Xu Z, Masuda Y, Wang X, Ushijima N, Shiratori Y et al. Genome-based taxonomic rearrangement of the order Geobacterales including the description of Geomonas azotofigens sp. nov. and Geomonas diazotrophica sp. nov. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:737531:737531 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
36. Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC, Salzberg SL. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics 2007; 23:673–679 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
37. Conway JR, Lex A, Gehlenborg N. UpSetR: an R package for the visualization of intersecting sets and their properties. Bioinformatics 2017; 33:2938–2940 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
38. Stothard P, Wishart DS. Circular genome visualization and exploration using CGView. Bioinformatics 2005; 21:537–539 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
39. Blin K, Shaw S, Kloosterman AM, Charlop-Powers Z, van Wezel GP et al. antiSMASH 6.0: improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:W29–W35 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
40. Nie Y, Chi C-Q, Fang H, Liang J-L, Lu S-L et al. Diverse alkane hydroxylase genes in microorganisms and environments. Sci Rep 2014; 4:4968 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
41. Kunze M, Zerlin KF, Retzlaff A, Pohl JO, Schmidt E et al. Degradation of chloroaromatics by Pseudomonas putida GJ31: assembled route for chlorobenzene degradation encoded by clusters on plasmid pKW1 and the chromosome. Microbiology 2009; 155:4069–4083 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
42. Zhao H, Yan B, Mo S, Nie S, Li Q et al. Carbohydrate metabolism genes dominant in a subtropical marine mangrove ecosystem revealed by metagenomics analysis. J Microbiol 2019; 57:575–586 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
43. Padgitt PJ, Moshier SE. Mycobacterium poriferae sp. nov., a scotochromogenic, rapidly growing species isolated from a marine sponge. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1987; 37:186–191 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
44. Shojaei H, Daley C, Gitti Z, Hashemi A, Heidarieh P et al. Mycobacterium iranicum sp. nov., a rapidly growing scotochromogenic species isolated from clinical specimens on three different continents. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:1383–1389 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]