Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes: Minutes of the Meeting on 27 July 2022

References

1. Holmes B, Farmer III JJ. Correction of the type strain of Aeromonas punctata (Zimmermann 1890) Snieszko 1957 and of A. punctata subsp. punctata from ATCC 15468^T to NCMB 74^T (=NCIMB 74^T= ATCC 23309^T). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:2155–2157 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
2. Farmer JJ, Holmes B. Conservation of the name Aeromonas eucrenophila over the name Aeromonas punctata for the organism based on type stain NCMB 74^T and universally defined as ‘Aeromonas DNA hybridization group 6.’. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:2158–2162 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
3. Margos G, Castillo-Ramirez S, Cutler S, Dessau RB, Eikeland R et al. Rejection of the name Borreliella and all proposed species comb. nov. placed therein. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:3577–3581 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
4. Ribeiro TG, Rocha J, Ksiezarek M, Perovic SU, Grosso F et al. The status of the species Lactobacillus fornicalis Dicks et al. 2000. Request for an opinion. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:3953–3954 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
5. Glaeser SP, Pulami D, Blom J, Eisenberg T, Goesmann A et al. The status of the genus Prolinoborus (Pot et al. 1992) and the species Prolinoborus fasciculus (Pot et al. 1992). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5165–5171 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
6. Velázquez E, Flores-Félix JD, Sánchez-Juanes F, Igual JM, Peix Á. Strain ATCC 4720^T is the authentic type strain of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, which is not a later heterotypic synonym of Agrobacterium radiobacter. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5172–5176 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
7. Parker CT, Tindall BJ, Garrity GM. International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:S1–S111 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
8. Balish M, Bertaccini A, Blanchard A, Brown D, Browning G et al. Recommended rejection of the names Malacoplasma gen. nov., Mesomycoplasma gen. nov., Metamycoplasma gen. nov., Metamycoplasmataceae fam. nov., Mycoplasmoidaceae fam. nov., Mycoplasmoidales ord. nov., Mycoplasmoides gen. nov., Mycoplasmopsis gen. nov. [Gupta, Sawnani, Adeolu, Alnajar and Oren 2018] and all proposed species comb. nov. placed therein. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:3650–3653 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
9. Margos G, Wormser GP, Schwartz I, Markowicz M, Henningsson AJ et al. Evidence of taxonomic bias in public databases: The example of the genus Borrelia. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2022; 13:101994 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
10. Sneath PHA, McGowan V, Skerman VBD. Approved lists of bacterial names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 2019; 30:225–420 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
11. Tindall BJ. Agrobacterium radiobacter (Beijerinck and van Delden 1902) Conn 1942 has priority over Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Smith and Townsend 1907) Conn 1942 when the two are treated as members of the same species based on the principle of priority and Rule 23a, Note 1 as applied to the corresponding specific epithets. Opinion 94. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:3590–3592 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]