1887

Abstract

A Gram-stain-negative, non-motile, ovoid or short rod shaped and aerobic marine bacterium, designated as strain LXJ103, was isolated from a coastal phytoplankton bloom in Xiamen, PR China. Cells were oxidase- and catalase-positive. Strain LXJ103 grew at 4–40 °C (optimum, 28–37 °C), at pH 6–10 (optimum, pH 8.5) and with 1–15 % (w/v) NaCl (optimum, 3 %). The major cellular fatty acids (>10 %) were iso-C 7/iso-C 6 (70.2 %) and C (10.3 %). The following polar lipids were found to be present: phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, two unidentified phospholipids and five unknown glycolipids. The predominant respiratory quinone was ubiquinone-10. Strain LXJ103 exhibited the highest 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity to D1-W8 (96.97 %). The phylogenetic trees based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that strain LXJ103 was a member of the genus . The draft genome size of strain LXJ103 is 3.05 Mb with a genomic G+C content of 61.22 mol%. The digital DNA–DNA genome hybridization value of strain LXJ103 compared with the most similar type strain CECT 8287 was 18.80 %. The average nucleotide identity value between strain LXJ103 and CECT 8287 was 72.60 %. On the basis of polyphasic data, strain LXJ103 represents a novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is LXJ103 (=CGMCC 1.19168=MCCC 1K06527=JCM 34778).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Award 2020YFA0608300)
    • Principle Award Recipient: TangKai
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award 42076160)
    • Principle Award Recipient: TangKai
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005577
2022-10-20
2024-05-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Hördt A, López MG, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Schleuning M, Weinhold L-M et al. Analysis of 1,000+ type-strain genomes substantially improves taxonomic classification of Alphaproteobacteria. Front Microbiol 2020; 11:468 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Labrenz M, Collins MD, Lawson PA, Tindall BJ. Roseovarius tolerans gen. nov., sp. nov., a budding bacterium with variable bacteriochlorophyll a production from hypersaline Ekho lake. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1999; 49 Pt 1:137–147
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Li Z, Zhao R, Ji S, Shi X, Zhang X-H. Roseovarius marisflavi sp. nov., isolated from an amphioxus breeding zone in the coastal region of the Yellow Sea, China. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2013; 104:413–421 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Park S, Ha MJ, Yoon SY, Jung YT, Yoon JH. Roseovarius aestuariivivens sp. nov., isolated from a tidal flat. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:25–30 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lu L, Zhang Y, Peng X, Liu J, Qin K et al. Roseovarius arcticus sp. nov., a bacterium isolated from Arctic marine sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:2072–2078 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhuang L, Luo L. Roseovarius spongiae sp. nov., a bacterium isolated from marine sponge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:274–281 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Deng S, Jiang F, Chang X, Qu Z, Ren L et al. Roseovarius antarcticus sp. nov., isolated from a decayed whale bone. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:2326–2333 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Han Y, Jiao N, Zhang Y, Zhang F, He C et al. Opportunistic bacteria with reduced genomes are effective competitors for organic nitrogen compounds in coastal dinoflagellate blooms. Microbiome 2021; 9:71 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Moreno C, Romero J, Espejo RT. Polymorphism in repeated 16S rRNA genes is a common property of type strains and environmental isolates of the genus Vibrio. Microbiology 2002; 148:1233–1239 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lee I, Chalita M, Ha S-M, Na S-I, Yoon S-H et al. ContEst16S: an algorithm that identifies contaminated prokaryotic genomes using 16S RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2053–2057 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Biol 1971; 20:406–416 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Jukes TH, Cantor CR. Evolution of protein molecules. In Munro HN. eds Mammalian Metabolism Protein New York: Academic Press; 1969 pp 21–132
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Tang K. Chemical diversity and biochemical transformation of biogenic organic sulfur in the ocean. Front Mar Sci 2020; 7:68 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Teeling H, Fuchs BM, Bennke CM, Krüger K, Chafee M et al. Recurring patterns in bacterioplankton dynamics during coastal spring algae blooms. Elife 2016; 5:e11888 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Graupner M, Xu H, White RH. Identification of the gene encoding sulfopyruvate decarboxylase, an enzyme involved in biosynthesis of coenzyme M. J Bacteriol 2000; 182:4862–4867 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Carbonero F, Benefiel AC, Alizadeh-Ghamsari AH, Gaskins HR. Microbial pathways in colonic sulfur metabolism and links with health and disease. Front Physiol 2012; 3:488 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kim J, Na S-I, Kim D, Chun J. UBCG2: up-to-date bacterial core genes and pipeline for phylogenomic analysis. J Microbiol 2021; 59:609–615 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Standard operating procedure for calculating genome-to-genome distances based on high-scoring segment pairs. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:142–148 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:117–134 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Moore WEC, Stackebrandt E, Kandler O, Colwell RR, Krichevsky MI et al. Report of the ad Hoc Committee on Reconciliation of Approaches to Bacterial Systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1987; 37:463–464 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Dong XZ, Cai MY. Determination of biochemical properties. In Manual for the Systematic Identification of General Bacteria Beijing: Scientific Press; 2001 pp 353–412
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Gregersen T. Rapid method for distinction of Gram-negative from Gram-positive bacteria. European J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1978; 5:123–127 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Smibert RM, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization. In Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR. eds Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994 pp 607–654
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 1989
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Xu P, Li WJ, Tang SK, Zhang YQ, Chen GZ. Naxibacter alkalitolerans gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel member of the family “oxalobacteraceae” isolated from chin. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:1149–1153
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Cowan ST, Steel KJ. Manual for the Identification of Medical Bacteria London: Cambridge University Press; 1965
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Rüger H-J, Krambeck H-J. Evaluation of the BIOLOG substrate metabolism system for classification of marine bacteria. Syst Appl Microbiol 1994; 17:281–288 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lewis T, Nichols PD, McMeekin TA. Evaluation of extraction methods for recovery of fatty acids from lipid-producing microheterotrophs. J Microbiol Methods 2000; 43:107–116 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Athalye M, Noble WC, Minnikin DE. Analysis of cellular fatty acids by gas chromatography as a tool in the identification of medically important coryneform bacteria. J Appl Bacteriol 1985; 58:507–512 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Komagata K, Suzuki K. Lipid and cell-wall analysis in bacterial systematics. Methods Microbiol 1987; 19:161–207
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Park S, Jung Y-T, Yoon J-H. Pelagicola litorisediminis sp. nov., a novel alphaproteobacterium isolated from tidal flat sediment. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2013; 104:103–110 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Choi EJ, Lee HJ, Kim JM, Jeon CO. Roseovarius lutimaris sp. nov., isolated from a marine tidal flat. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:3835–3840 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Park S, Park J-M, Kang C-H, Yoon J-H. Roseovarius gaetbuli sp. nov., a novel alphaproteobacterium isolated from a tidal flat sediment. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2014; 105:723–730 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005577
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005577
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error