Aestuarium zhoushanense is a later heterotypic synonym of Marivivens donghaensis, and transfer of Paradonghicola geojensis to the genus Marivivens as Marivivens geojensis comb. nov

References

1. Yu X-Y, Zhai J-Y, Fu G-Y, Shen X, Zhao Z et al. Aestuarium zhoushanense gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from the tidal flat. Curr Microbiol 2017; 74:1469–1476 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
2. Lee K, Srinivasan S, Lee S-S. Paradonghicola geojensis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from seawater, Geoje-si, South Korea. Arch Microbiol 2016; 198:501–507 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
3. Park S, Kim S, Jung YT, Yoon JH. Marivivens donghaensis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from seawater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:666–672 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
4. Hu D, Wang L, Lai Q, Sun F, Shao Z. Marivivens niveibacter sp. nov., isolated from the seawater of tropical mangrove. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:570–574 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
5. Kim JA, Lee B, Kang JY, Song JJ, Choi JH. Marivivens aquimaris sp. nov., isolated from seawater. Arch Microbiol 2021; 203:3229–3234 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
7. Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt H-H, Rognes T et al. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:3100–3108 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
8. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:1–14 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
9. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
10. Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. Bypassing cultivation to identify bacterial species. Microbe Magazine 2014; 9:111–118 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
11. Na S-I, Kim YO, Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Baek I et al. UBCG: up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Microbiol 2018; 56:280–285 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
12. Ren Y, Yu G, Shi C, Liu L, Guo Q et al. Majorbio cloud: a one‐stop, comprehensive bioinformatic platform for multiomics analyses. iMeta 2022; 1:iMeta [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
13. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
14. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
15. Yarza P, Yilmaz P, Pruesse E, Glöckner FO, Ludwig W et al. Uniting the classification of cultured and uncultured bacteria and archaea using 16S rRNA gene sequences. Nat Rev Microbiol 2014; 12:635–645 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
16. Moore WEC, Stackebrandt E, Kandler O, Colwell RR, Krichevsky MI et al. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1987; 37:463–464 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
17. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
18. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Towards a genome-based taxonomy for prokaryotes. J Bacteriol 2005; 187:6258–6264 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]