Proposal to transfer Bacillus lacisalsi Dong et al. 2021 to the genus Alteribacter as Alteribacter lacisalsi comb. nov.

References

1. Gupta RS, Patel S, Saini N, Chen S. Robust demarcation of 17 distinct Bacillus species clades, proposed as novel Bacillaceae genera, by phylogenomics and comparative genomic analyses: description of Robertmurraya kyonggiensis sp. nov. and proposal for an emended genus Bacillus limiting it only to the members of the Subtilis and Cereus clades of species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5753–5798 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
2. Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5607–5612 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
3. Borsodi AK, Márialigeti K, Szabó G, Palatinszky M, Pollák B et al. Bacillus aurantiacus sp. nov., an alkaliphilic and moderately halophilic bacterium isolated from Hungarian soda lakes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:845–851 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
4. Menes RJ, Machin EV, Iriarte A, Langleib M. Bacillus natronophilus sp. nov., an alkaliphilic bacterium isolated from a soda lake. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:562–568 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
5. Liu B, Liu G-H, Wang X-Y, Wang J-P, Zhu Y-J et al. Bacillus populi sp. nov. isolated from Populus euphratica rhizosphere soil of the Taklamakan desert. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:155–159 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
6. Wang S, Sun L, Narsing Rao MP, Liu G-H, Jin P-J et al. Alteribacter salitolerans sp. nov., isolated from a saline-alkaline soil. Arch Microbiol 2021; 204:53 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
7. Dong L, Wang S, Cao H, Zhao B, Zhang X et al. Bacillus lacisalsi sp. nov., a moderately haloalkaliphilic bacterium isolated from a saline-alkaline lake. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2020; 113:127–136 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
8. Oren A, Garrity GM. Valid publication of new names and new combinations effectively published outside the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:005096
   [Google Scholar]
9. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
10. Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt H-H, Rognes T et al. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:3100–3108 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
11. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
12. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
13. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
14. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 1971; 20:406 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
15. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
16. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22:4673–4680 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
18. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
19. Eren AM, Esen ÖC, Quince C, Vineis JH, Morrison HG et al. Anvi’o: an advanced analysis and visualization platform for ‘omics data. PeerJ 2015; 3:e1319 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
20. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:1792–1797 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
21. Pritchard L, Glover RH, Humphris S, Elphinstone JG, Toth IK. Genomics and taxonomy in diagnostics for food security: soft-rotting enterobacterial plant pathogens. Anal Methods 2016; 8:12–24 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
22. Rosselló-Móra R, Amann R. Past and future species definitions for Bacteria and Archaea. Syst Appl Microbiol 2015; 38:209–216 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
23. Konstantinidis KT, Rosselló-Móra R, Amann R. Uncultivated microbes in need of their own taxonomy. ISME J 2017; 11:2399–2406 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
24. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]