1887

Abstract

A novel moderately halophilic bacterium, designated strain KHM2, was isolated from the sediment of a grey solar saltern located on Sinui Island, Shinan, Republic of Korea. Cells were rod-shaped, endospore-forming, Gram-stain-positive, motile and facultative anaerobic. Strain KHM2 performed anaerobic respiration using nitrates and did not produce glucose acids, indicating the absence of fermentation. Strain KHM2 grew at 10–45 °C (optimum, 37 °C), pH 6.0–10.0 (optimum, pH 8.0) and with 1.0–20.0 % (w/v) NaCl (optimum, 10.0%). Based on 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity and chemotaxonomic properties, strain KHM2 was assigned to the genus , with high 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity to B6B (98.2%) and less than 96.8 % similarity to the other recognized members of the genus . The polar lipid profile consisted of diphosphatidylglycerol (DPG), phosphatidylglycerol (PG) and one unidentified phospholipid (PL). Major fatty acids were anteiso-C and anteiso-C. The average nucleotide identity and digital DNA–DNA hybridization values of strain KHM2 with B6B were 77.6 and 22.0 %, respectively. Based on the results of polyphasic analysis, strain KHM2 is proposed to represent a bacterial species within the genus with the name sp. nov. The type strain is KHM2 (=KACC 19068=NBRC 112577)

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005496
2022-08-22
2024-05-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amoozegar MA, Bagheri M, Didari M, Mehrshad M, Schumann P et al. Aquibacillus halophilus gen. nov., sp. nov., a moderately halophilic bacterium from a hypersaline lake, and reclassification of Virgibacillus koreensis as Aquibacillus koreensis comb. nov. and Virgibacillus albus as Aquibacillus albus comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:3616–3623 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhang W-Y, Hu J, Zhang X-Q, Zhu X-F, Wu M. Aquibacillus salifodinae sp. nov., a novel bacterium isolated from a salt mine in Xinjiang province, China. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2015; 107:367–374 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Lee JC, Whang KS. Aquibacillus sediminis sp. nov., a moderately halophilic bacterium isolated from saltern soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:3121–3127 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lee J-S, Lim J-M, Lee KC, Lee J-C, Park Y-H et al. Virgibacillus koreensis sp. nov., a novel bacterium from a salt field, and transfer of Virgibacillus picturae to the genus Oceanobacillus as Oceanobacillus picturae comb. nov. with emended descriptions. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:251–257 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhang Y-J, Zhou Y, Ja M, Shi R, Chun-Yu W-X et al. Virgibacillus albus sp. nov., a novel moderately halophilic bacterium isolated from Lop Nur salt lake in Xinjiang province, China. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2012; 102:553–560 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang H-T, Xu L, Sun J-Q. Aquibacillus kalidii sp. nov., an indole acetic acid-producing endophyte from a shoot of Kalidium cuspidatum, and reclassification of Virgibacillus campisalis Lee et al. 2012 as a later heterotypic synonym of Virgibacillus alimentarius Kim et al. 2011. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:005030 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cho G-Y, Whang K-S. Aliifodinibius saliphilus sp. nov., a moderately halophilic bacterium isolated from sediment of a crystallizing pond of a saltern. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:358–363 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007; 23:2947–2948 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 1971; 20:406 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol 2021; 38:3022–3027 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP et al. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:6614–6624 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T et al. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 2008; 9:75 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park S-C, Chun J. OrthoANI: an improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1100–1103 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hucker GJ, Conn HJ. Technical Bulletin No. 93: Methods of Gram staining. New York Agricultural Experiment Station; 1923
  24. Schaeffer AB, Fulton MD. A simplified method of staining endospores. Science 1933; 77:194 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Collee JG, Watt B, Fowler EB, Brown R. An evaluation of the Gaspak system in the culture of anaerobic bacteria. J Appl Bacteriol 1972; 35:71–82 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Collins MD, Jones D. Distribution of isoprenoid quinone structural types in bacteria and their taxonomic implication. Microbiol Rev 1981; 45:316–354 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Schleifer KH, Kandler O. Peptidoglycan types of bacterial cell walls and their taxonomic implications. Bacteriol Rev 1972; 36:407–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005496
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005496
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error