1887

Abstract

A mesophilic sulphate-reducing micro-organism, able to grow chemolithoautotrophically with H/CO (20 : 80) and with elemental iron as a sole electron donor, was isolated from a consortium capable of degrading long-chain paraffins and designated strain DRH4. Cells were oval shaped often with bright refractile cores and occurred singly or in pairs. The cells formed pili. Strain DRH4 could grow chemolithoautotrophically with H/CO or elemental iron and chemoorganotrophically utilizing a number of organic substrates, such as fatty acids from formate to octanoate (C–C). Sulphate and thiosulphate served as terminal electron acceptors, but sulphite and nitrate did not. Optimal growth was observed from 37 to 40 °C and pH from 6.5 to 7.2. Strain DRH4 did not require NaCl for growth and could proliferate under a broad range of salinities from freshwater (1 g l NaCl) to seawater (27 g l NaCl) conditions. The genomic DNA G+C content was 54.46 mol %. Based on 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. strain DRH4 was distinct from previously described species exhibiting the closest affiliation to ASRB1, TB8106 and 12016 with 93.35, 93.42 and 92.85 % similarity, respectively. Strain DRH4 showed significant physiological differences with the aforementioned organisms. Based on physiological differences and phylogenetic comparisons, we propose to classify DRH4 as the type strain (=DSM 113 455=JCM 39 248) of a novel species of a new genus with the name gen. nov., sp. nov.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005483
2022-08-12
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Liang R, Davidova I, Hirano S, Duncan KE, Suflita JM. Community succession in an anaerobic long-chain paraffin-degrading consortium and impact on chemical and electrical microbially influenced iron corrosion. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2019; 95:fiz 111 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dinh HT, Kuever J, Mussmann M, Hassel AW, Stratmann M et al. Iron corrosion by novel anaerobic microorganisms. Nature 2004; 427:829–832 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Enning D, Garrelfs J. Corrosion of iron by sulfate-reducing bacteria: new views of an old problem. Appl Environ Microbiol 2014; 80:1226–1236 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Beese-Vasbender PF, Nayak S, Erbe A, Stratmann M, Mayrhofer KJJ. Electrochemical characterization of direct electron uptake in electrical microbially influenced corrosion of iron by the lithoautotrophic SRB Desulfopila corrodens strain IS4. Electrochim Acta 2015; 167:321–329 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Enning D, Venzlaff H, Garrelfs J, Dinh HT, Meyer V et al. Marine sulfate-reducing bacteria cause serious corrosion of iron under electroconductive biogenic mineral crust. Environ Microbiol 2012; 14:1772–1787 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Deng X, Dohmae N, Nealson KH, Hashimoto K, Okamoto A. Multi-heme cytochromes provide a pathway for survival in energy-limited environments. Sci Adv 2018; 4:eaao5682 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. McCully AL, Spormann AM. Direct cathodic electron uptake coupled to sulfate reduction by Desulfovibrio ferrophilus IS5 biofilms. Environ Microbiol 2020; 22:4794–4807 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chatterjee M, Fan Y, Cao F, Jones AA, Pilloni G et al. Proteomic study of Desulfovibrio ferrophilus IS5 reveals overexpressed extracellular multi-heme cytochrome associated with severe microbiologically influenced corrosion. Sci Rep 2021; 11:15458 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Galushko A, Kuever J. Family Syntrophophobacteraceae. In Witman WB, Rainey F, Kämpfer P, Trujillo M, Chun J. eds Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria New York: Wiley&Sons, Inc. in association with Bergey’s Manual Trust; [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Oude Elferink SJ, Maas RN, Harmsen HJ, Stams AJ. Desulforhabdus amnigenus gen. nov. sp. nov., a sulfate reducer isolated from anaerobic granular sludge. Arch Microbiol 1995; 164:119–124 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen S, Liu X, Dong X. Syntrophobacter sulfatireducens sp. nov., a novel syntrophic, propionate-oxidizing bacterium isolated from UASB reactors. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:1319–1324 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Galushko A, Kuever J. Genus Syntrophobacterium gen. nov. In Witman WB, Rainey F, Kämpfer P, Trujillo M, Chun J. eds Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria New York: Wiley, in association with Bergey’s Manual Trust; 2020 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Tanaka K, Stackebrandt E, Tohyama S, Eguchi T. Desulfovirga adipica gen. nov., sp. nov., an adipate-degrading, Gram-negative, sulfate-reducing bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50 Pt 2:639–644 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Widdel F, Bak F. Gram-negative mesophilic sulfate-reducing bacteria. In Balows A, Trüper HG, Dworkin M, W H, Schleifer KH. eds The Prokaryotes New York: Springer; 1992 pp 3352–3378 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Tanner R et al. Cultivation of bacteria and fungi. In Hurst CJ, Knudsen GR, McInerney MJ, Stezenbach LD. eds Manual of Environmental Microbiology Washington, DC: ASM; 1997 p 52
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Caldwell ME, Garrett RM, Prince RC, Suflita JM. Anaerobic biodegradation of long-chain n -alkanes under sulfate-reducing conditions. Environ Sci Technol 1998; 32:2191–2195 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Trueper HG, Schlegel HG. Sulphur metabolism in Thiorhodaceae. I. Quantitative measurements on growing cells of Chromatium okenii. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 1964; 30:225–238 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 1991; 173:697–703 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLOS Comput Biol 2017; 13:e1005595 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22:4673–4680 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:2725–2729 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lovley DR, Walker DJF. Geobacter protein nanowires. Front Microbiol 2019; 10: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hirano S, Davidova IA, Suflita JM. Electrochemical properties of two sulfate reducing bacteria from a paraffin-degrading consortium. Yokohama, Japan, Pacifico Yokohama: NACE East Asia&Pacific Area Conference; 2019Nov11
  24. Li W, O’Neill KR, Haft DH, DiCuccio M, Chetvernin V et al. RefSeq: expanding the prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline reach with protein family model curation. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:D1020–D1028 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005483
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005483
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error