1887

Abstract

A new strain, designated F2B, was isolated from an anaerobic digester for treating solid waste from a marine recirculating aquaculture system. The motile, Gram-negative, non-spore-forming curved rods were 2–7 µm long and 1 µm in diameter. Growth occurred at temperatures ranging from 20 to 40 °C with a maximum rate of growth at 30 °C. The pH range for growth was pH 6.0–8.0, with a maximum rate of growth at pH 7.5. This isolate was halotolerant growing in NaCl concentrations ranging from 0 to 1.6 M with a maximum rate of growth at 0.4 M. Similarly to the five described species, this obligate anaerobe isolate was fermentative, capable of utilizing peptides, amino acids and some organic acids for growth, but unlike described strains in the genus did not reduce thiosulphate or elemental sulphur to hydrogen sulphide during fermentation of organic substrates. The G+C content of 55 mol% is similar to the described species. The average nucleotide identity analysis between whole genome sequences showed less than 93.15% sequence similarity between strain F2B and the five other described species. Differences in the physiological and phylogenetic characteristics between the new strain and other specied indicate that F2B represents a novel species of this genus and the epithet sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is F2B (=DSM 112078=KCTC25378).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005456
2022-08-04
2024-05-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Whitman WB et al. Dethiosulfovibrio. In Whitman WB. eds Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria New York: Wiley; 2009 pp 1174–1176
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Magot M, Ravot G, Campaignolle X, Ollivier B, Patel BK et al. Dethiosulfovibrio peptidovorans gen. nov., sp. nov., a new anaerobic, slightly halophilic, thiosulfate-reducing bacterium from corroding offshore oil wells. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:818–824 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Díaz-Cárdenas C, López G, Patel BKC, Baena S. Dethiosulfovibrio salsuginis sp. nov., an anaerobic, slightly halophilic bacterium isolated from a saline spring. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:850–853 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Surkov AV, Dubinina GA, Lysenko AM, Glöckner FO, Kuever J. Dethiosulfovibrio russensis sp. nov., Dethosulfovibrio marinus sp. nov. and Dethosulfovibrio acidaminovorans sp. nov., novel anaerobic, thiosulfate- and sulfur-reducing bacteria isolated from “Thiodendron” sulfur mats in different saline environments. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:327–337 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Quinn B, Apolinario EA, Gross A, Sowers KR. Microbial characterization of mariculture fish waste reduction to biomethane. Aquaculture 2015; 453:154–162 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Zohar Y, Tal Y, Schreier HJ, Steven C, Stubblefield J et al. Commercially easible urban recirculating aquaculture. In Costa-Pierce BA, Desbonnet A, Edwards P, Baker D. eds Urban Aquaculture 2005 pp 159–172
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Apolinario EA, Sowers KR. Plate colonization of Methanococcus maripaludis and Methanosarcina thermophila in a modified canning jar. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1996; 145:131–137
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Berkaw M, Sowers KR, May HD. Anaerobic ortho dechlorination of polychlorinated biphenyls by estuarine sediments from baltimore arbor. Appl Environ Microbiol 1996; 62:2534–2539 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Winnepenninckx B, Backeljau T, De Wachter R. Extraction of high molecular weight DNA from molluscs. Trends Genet 1993; 9:407 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Baym M, Kryazhimskiy S, Lieberman TD, Chung H, Desai MM et al. Inexpensive multiplexed library preparation for megabase-sized genomes. PLoS ONE 2015; 10:e0128036 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2114–2120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Arkin AP, Cottingham RW, Henry CS, Harris NL, Stevens RL et al. KBase: the United States department of energy systems biology knowledgebase. Nat Biotechnol 2018; 36:566–569 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Brettin T, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S et al. RASTtk: a modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci Rep 2015; 5:8365 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2--approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 2010; 5:e9490 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41:D590–6 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 2004; 5:113 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Tamura K, Nei M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol 1993; 10:512–526 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:1972–1973 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Eddy SR. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput Biol 2011; 7:e1002195 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lee MD. GToTree: a user-friendly workflow for phylogenomics. Bioinformatics 2019; 35:4162–4164 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:268–274 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D801–D807 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 2018; 9:1–8 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:929–931 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kurtz S, Phillippy A, Delcher AL, Smoot M, Shumway M et al. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol 2004; 5:R12 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005456
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005456
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error