Assignment of provisionally named CDC group NO-1 strains derived from animal bite wounds and other clinical sources, to genera nova in the family Comamonadaceae: description of Vandammella animalimorsus gen. nov., sp. nov. and Franklinella schreckenbergeri gen. nov., sp. nov

References

1. Hollis DG, Moss CW, Daneshvar MI, Meadows L, Jordan J et al. Characterization of Centers for Disease Control group NO-1, a fastidious, nonoxidative, gram-negative organism associated with dog and cat bites. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31:746–748 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
2. Kaiser RM, Garman RL, Bruce MG, Weyant RS, Ashford DA. Clinical significance and epidemiology of NO-1, an unusual bacterium associated with dog and cat bites. Emerg Infect Dis 2002; 8:171–174 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
3. Weyant RS, Moss CW, Weaver RE, Hollis DG, Jordan JG et al. Identification of Unusual Pathogenic Gram-Negative Aerobic and Facultatively Anaerobic Bacteria, 2nd edn. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1996
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bernard KA, Shuttleworth L, Munro C, Forbes-Faulkner JC, Pitt D et al. Propionibacterium australiense sp. nov. derived from granulomatous bovine lesions. Anaerobe 2002; 8:41–47 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
5. Stackebrandt E, Ebers J. Taxonomic parameters revisited: tarnished gold standards. Microbiol Today 2006; 33:152–155
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
7. Fang W, Li Y, Xue H, Tian G, Wang L et al. Corticibacter populi gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the family Comamonadaceae, from the bark of Populus euramericana. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:3333–3338 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
9. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2068–2069 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
10. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:929–931 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
11. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
12. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60–2105 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
13. Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. Bypassing cultivation to identify bacterial species. Microbe Magazine 2014; 9:111–118 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
14. Petkau A, Mabon P, Sieffert C, Knox NC, Cabral J et al. SNVPhyl: a single nucleotide variant phylogenomics pipeline for microbial genomic epidemiology. Microb Genom 2017; 3:e000116 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
15. Bernard K, Cooper C, Tessier S, Ewan EP. Use of chemotaxonomy as an aid to differentiate among Capnocytophaga species, CDC group DF-3, and aerotolerant strains of Leptotrichia buccalis. J Clin Microbiol 1991; 29:2263–2265 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
16. Willems A, Gillis M. Family IV. Comamonadaceae Willems, De Ley, Gillis and Kersters 1991a, 447^VP. In Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, Garrity GM. eds Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology Springer; 2005 pp 686–688
    [Google Scholar]
17. Weinstein MP, Patel JB. M100: Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; 28th Informational Supplement Wayne, PA: Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute; 2018
    [Google Scholar]