1887

Abstract

Four novel bacterial strains (zg-ZUI122/zg-ZUI10 and zg-ZUI227/zg-ZUI100) were isolated from the intestinal contents of and characterized using a polyphasic approach. Cells were Gram-stain- and catalase-positive, urease- and oxidase-negative. Strains grew optimally at 28–30 °C, pH 7.0, with 0.5 % NaCl (w/v). A comparative analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences revealed that strain pairs zg-ZUI122/zg-ZUI10 and zg-ZUI227/zg-ZUI100 belonged to the genus and were most closely related to DSM 20133, with similarities of 99.6 and 99.5 %, respectively. This was further confirmed by phylogenetic analyses based on the 16S rRNA gene and genome sequences. The digital DNA–DNA hybridization and average nucleotide identity values between the two new type strains (zg-ZUI122 and zg-ZUI227) and other species in the genus were 20.0–24.4/77.2–83.4% and 19.9–25.1/77.1–83.4%, all below the thresholds. The major cellular fatty acids detected in the two novel species included -C and -C; the predominant polar lipids were diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol and phosphatidylinositol. MK-8(H) (77.3%) was the predominant respiratory quinone detected in strain zg-ZUI122, while MK-8(H) (53.7%) and MK-9(H) (46.3%) were detected in strain zg-ZUI227. The shared cell-wall amino acids detected in the two novel species were alanine, glutamic acid and lysine; the shared whole cell wall sugars consisted of galactose, mannose and ribose. All these analyses concluded that these four strains represent two different novel species in the genus , for which the names sp. nov. (zg-ZUI122 = GDMCC 1.2502 = KCTC 49677) and sp. nov. (zg-ZUI227 = GDMCC 1.2500 = KCTC 49676) are proposed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005181
2022-02-01
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Conn HJ, Dimmick I. Soil bacteria similar in morphology to Mycobacterium and Corynebacterium . J Bacteriol 1947; 54:291–303 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ye J-J, Liu S-W, Lu Q-P, Cheema MT, Abbas M et al. Arthrobacter mobilis sp. nov., a novel actinobacterium isolated from Cholistan desert soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5445–5452 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Koh H-W, Kang M-S, Lee K-E, Lee E-Y, Kim H et al. Arthrobacter dokdonellae sp. nov., isolated from a plant of the genus Campanula . J Microbiol 2019; 57:732–737 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chang H-W, Bae J-W, Nam Y-D, Kwon H-Y, Park JR et al. Arthrobacter subterraneus sp. nov., isolated from deep subsurface water of the South Coast of Korea. J Microbiol Biotechnol 2007; 17:1875–1879 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lin P, Yan ZF, Li CT. Arthrobacter sedimenti sp. nov., isolated from river sediment in Yuantouzhu park, China. Arch Microbiol 2020; 202:2551–2556 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Han X, Zhang Q, Ma Q, Kong D, Zhou Y et al. Arthrobacter sulfonylureivorans sp. nov., isolated from a sulfonylurea herbicides degrading consortium enriched with birch forest soil. Arch Microbiol 2021; 203:1039–1045 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bai X, Lu S, Yang J, Jin D, Pu J et al. Precise fecal microbiome of the herbivorous tibetan antelope inhabiting high-altitude alpine plateau. Front Microbiol 2018; 9:2321 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Meng X, Lu S, Yang J, Jin D, Wang X et al. Metataxonomics reveal vultures as a reservoir for Clostridium perfringens . Emerg Microbes Infect 2017; 6:e9 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ge Y, Tao Y, Yang J, Lai X-H, Jin D et al. Arthrobacter yangruifuii sp. nov. and Arthrobacter zhaoguopingii sp. nov., two new members of the genus Arthrobacter . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5287–5295 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Liu Q, Liu HC, Zhou YG, Xin YH. Genetic diversity of glacier-inhabiting Cryobacterium bacteria in China and description of Cryobacterium zongtaii sp. nov. and Arthrobacter glacialis sp. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 2019; 42:168–177 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Lee JS, Lee KC, Pyun YR, Bae KS. Arthrobacter koreensis sp. nov., a novel alkalitolerant bacterium from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003; 53:1277–1280 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Storms V, Devriese LA, Coopman R, Schumann P, Vyncke F et al. Arthrobacter gandavensis sp. nov., for strains of veterinary origin. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003; 53:1881–1884 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Busse HJ. Review of the taxonomy of the genus Arthrobacter, emendation of the genus Arthrobacter sensu lato, proposal to reclassify selected species of the genus Arthrobacter in the novel genera Glutamicibacter gen. nov., Paeniglutamicibacter gen. nov., Pseudoglutamicibacter gen. nov., Paenarthrobacter gen. nov. and Pseudarthrobacter gen. nov., and emended description of Arthrobacter roseus . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:9–37 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22:4673–4680 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M et al. MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 2011; 28:2731–2739 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhang G, Lai X-H, Yang J, Jin D, Pu J et al. Luteimonas chenhongjianii, a novel species isolated from rectal contents of Tibetan Plateau pika (Ochotona curzoniae). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:3186–3193 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lee I, Chalita M, Ha S-M, Na S-I, Yoon S-H et al. ContEst16S: an algorithm that identifies contaminated prokaryotic genomes using 16S RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2053–2057 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Blin K, Shaw S, Steinke K, Villebro R, Ziemert N et al. antiSMASH 5.0: updates to the secondary metabolite genome mining pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:W81–W87 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Fu L, Niu B, Zhu Z, Wu S, Li W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2012; 28:3150–3152 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree: computing large minimum evolution trees with profiles instead of a distance matrix. Mol Biol Evol 2009; 26:1641–1650 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Huson DH, Scornavacca C. Dendroscope 3: an interactive tool for rooted phylogenetic trees and networks. Syst Biol 2012; 61:1061–1067 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:117–134 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Borsodi AK, Tóth E, Aszalós JM, Bárány Á, Schumann P et al. Bacillus kiskunsagensis sp. nov., a novel alkaliphilic and moderately halophilic bacterium isolated from soda soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:3490–3495 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhang G, Yang J, Lai X-H, Lu S, Jin D et al. Neisseria chenwenguii sp. nov. isolated from the rectal contents of a plateau pika (Ochotona curzoniae). Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2019; 112:1001–1010 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Minnikin DE, Patel PV, Alshamaony L, Goodfellow M. Polar lipid composition in the classification of Nocardia and related bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1977; 27:104–117 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Collins MD, Pirouz T, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Distribution of menaquinones in actinomycetes and corynebacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1977; 100:221–230 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lechevalier MP. The chemotaxonomy of actinomycetes. Actinomycete Taxonomy 1980227–291
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Schleifer KH, Kandler O. Peptidoglycan types of bacterial cell walls and their taxonomic implications. Bacteriol Rev 1972; 36:407–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Collins MD, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Polar lipid composition in the classification of Arthrobacter and Microbacterium . FEMS Microbiol Lett 1982; 15:299–302 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Koch C, Schumann P, Stackebrandt E. Reclassification of Micrococcus agilis (Ali-Cohen 1889) to the genus Arthrobacter as Arthrobacter agilis comb. nov. and emendation of the genus Arthrobacter . Int J Syst Bacteriol 1995; 45:837–839 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005181
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005181
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error