1887

Abstract

KZ-21 was compared with THG-SMD2.3 to examine the taxonomic relationship between the two type strains. The 16S rRNA gene sequence of KZ-21 shared complete similarity (100.0 %) with that of THG-SMD2.3. The results of phylogenetic analyses based on 16S rRNA gene sequences indicated that the two strains formed a tight cluster within the genus . Genome comparison between the two strains revealed an average nucleotide identity of 99.2 % and a digital DNA–DNA hybridization estimate of 93.7±1.8 %, strongly indicating that the two strains belong to a single species. In addition, neither strain displayed any striking differences in metabolic, physiological or chemotaxonomic features. Therefore, we propose as a later heterotypic synonym of .

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • the national natural science foundation of china (Award 42073077)
    • Principle Award Recipient: YuliWei
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005089
2021-09-27
2021-10-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bergey DH, Harrison FC, Breed RS, Hammer BW, Huntoon FM et al. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology Baltimore: Williams &Wilkins; 1923
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Parte AC. LPSN-List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (bacterio.net), 20 years on. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:1825–1829 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Yamamura H, Hayashi T, Hamada M, Kohda T, Serisawa Y et al. Cellulomonas algicola sp. nov., an actinobacterium isolated from a freshwater alga. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:2723–2728 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kim SK, Kook M, Yan ZF, Trinh H, Zheng SD et al. Cellulomonas aurantiaca sp. nov., isolated from a soil sample from a tangerine field. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2019; 112:1623–1632 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y. Introducing EzBio-Cloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Standard operating procedure for calculating genome-to-genome distances based on high-scoring segment pairs. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:142–148 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk HP, Göker M. Digital DNA–DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:117–134 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Wayne LG, Moore WEC, Stackebrandt E, Kandler O, Colwell RR et al. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1987; 37:463–464 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005089
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005089
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error